Cabinet Reform Amendment (Failed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 05:18:04 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Cabinet Reform Amendment (Failed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Cabinet Reform Amendment (Failed)  (Read 2951 times)
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,527
France


« on: February 05, 2015, 11:51:12 AM »

I obviously oppose the constant attempt made by Lumine to make the executive power stronger.
Just to be clear by the way, I don't believe you're a far-rightwinger or anytning like that Lumine, you seem to believe in a ultra presidential system I don't like.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,527
France


« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2015, 02:12:06 PM »

Well Lumine:
- your former executive order passing a budget: that's a senate duty to pass a budget.
- your law giving some GM duties to the SoEA, an office you directly control and that you could dismiss
-your amendment to the senate rules allowing the president to post in the legislative introduction thread
-and now this amendment making clear the GM is a member of the cabinet.


Oh, just to be clear, you're not malicious at all, I don't even think you realize that, but you constantly try to make the office of president even more powerful, and this is something I disagree.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,527
France


« Reply #2 on: February 06, 2015, 04:54:45 PM »

I won't oppose but I will propose my own amendment later.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,527
France


« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2015, 10:38:36 AM »

Well,
Aye
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,527
France


« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2015, 08:45:39 AM »

Aye
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,527
France


« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2015, 12:02:55 PM »

I have a last concern:
Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Simply,
I don't believe that the senate would be able to remove a controversial GM by a 2/3 majority. Currently, the left/right divide is 8/2. As I guess I will be defeated and maybe someone else, with the right likely regaining at least a seat for the next at large elections: in the long term, the statu quo will be 5 leftwingers/5 "rightwingers".
If the GM starts being controversial (that won't be the case for Kal obviously) and for example decides to raise unemployment rate by 4 points (yes it happened in the past), I don't think there will be enough leftwingers or rightwingers to cross party line if a 2/3 majority is needed.
That(s why I believe a 3/5 majority is more appropriate.
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,527
France


« Reply #6 on: March 01, 2015, 03:06:28 PM »

Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,527
France


« Reply #7 on: March 04, 2015, 07:30:35 PM »

An another amendment that fails because of too few votes casted...
Logged
windjammer
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,527
France


« Reply #8 on: March 04, 2015, 07:44:55 PM »

Oh well, no use getting mad because of this. (That said, I hope some Senators will start voting more often at the start of the next session)
Oh just to be clear, I'm not getting mad.

It's just that's the second amendment that fails because some senators don't vote...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.