California 8th Congressional District
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 11:15:09 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  California 8th Congressional District
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Who do you support?
#1
Nancy Pelosi
 
#2
John Dennis
 
#3
Cindy Sheehan
 
#4
Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 38

Author Topic: California 8th Congressional District  (Read 11902 times)
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: June 12, 2010, 10:53:22 PM »

Congresswoman Sheehan would be an uncompromising clown, unwilling to work with anyone on anything. She's an attention whore who does and says the most outlandish and ridiculous things to generate controversy.

Uncompromising? So you mean, unlike Pelosi, Congresswoman Sheehan would actually take a stand to end the wars, the reason the Democrats were voted into office in 2006 in the first place? How horrible that would be.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Oh yeah, Pelosi gave you single-payer national healthcare right? Or at least the public option you wanted?
Logged
Shilly
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 590
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: June 12, 2010, 11:19:08 PM »

Don't let the high Demoratic percentages in San Francisco fool you. There isn't much on the far left.

Well, combatting stereotypes is good and all, but still, there's more than most places in America. I mean, very few if any other districts would have given Sheehan 16% against someone like Pelosi.

True. But San Francisco is a lot farther right than it is popularly believed to be. It has a rightist mayor.

Gavin Newsom is a right-winger now? LOL how so? The fact that endorsed Hillary in the primaries or the fact that he's been such an outspoken advocate of same-sex marriage?
I'ts quite obvious you don't know much about San Francisco, semocrat08. Tongue
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,023


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: June 12, 2010, 11:22:30 PM »

Congresswoman Sheehan would be an uncompromising clown, unwilling to work with anyone on anything. She's an attention whore who does and says the most outlandish and ridiculous things to generate controversy.

Uncompromising? So you mean, unlike Pelosi, Congresswoman Sheehan would actually take a stand to end the wars, the reason the Democrats were voted into office in 2006 in the first place? How horrible that would be.

And would accomplish absolutely nothing in the progress. Hooray!

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Oh yeah, Pelosi gave you single-payer national healthcare right? Or at least the public option you wanted?

I never said she works magic. At the end of the day we still have corporate-owned DINOs like Blanche Lincoln and Ben Nelson in the party. But the will would have been even weaker without her.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: June 12, 2010, 11:35:27 PM »

Congresswoman Sheehan would be an uncompromising clown, unwilling to work with anyone on anything. She's an attention whore who does and says the most outlandish and ridiculous things to generate controversy.

Uncompromising? So you mean, unlike Pelosi, Congresswoman Sheehan would actually take a stand to end the wars, the reason the Democrats were voted into office in 2006 in the first place? How horrible that would be.

And would accomplish absolutely nothing in the progress. Hooray!

So you consider the cause of ending the war to be worth "absolutely nothing" in terms of accomplishment?

I see the Democrats have internalized the Bush war-without-end mentality now that they're Obama's wars...
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: June 12, 2010, 11:59:48 PM »

Congresswoman Sheehan would be an uncompromising clown, unwilling to work with anyone on anything. She's an attention whore who does and says the most outlandish and ridiculous things to generate controversy.

Uncompromising? So you mean, unlike Pelosi, Congresswoman Sheehan would actually take a stand to end the wars, the reason the Democrats were voted into office in 2006 in the first place? How horrible that would be.

And would accomplish absolutely nothing in the progress. Hooray!

So you consider the cause of ending the war to be worth "absolutely nothing" in terms of accomplishment?

I see the Democrats have internalized the Bush war-without-end mentality now that they're Obama's wars...

Does this cat really think the Dems ran against the wars in 2006? lol

They ran against BUSH. And Bush's war was Iraq. So they ran against Bush via Iraq. No better way to run against an unpopular President then to run against the unpopular war he started. Thats one thing Dems have in their favor this time. Whereas in 2006, the dems just had to say Iraq 1000 times to win, this year that isn't one think that epitomizes all the things people don't like about Obama.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: June 13, 2010, 12:04:07 AM »

Congresswoman Sheehan would be an uncompromising clown, unwilling to work with anyone on anything. She's an attention whore who does and says the most outlandish and ridiculous things to generate controversy.

Uncompromising? So you mean, unlike Pelosi, Congresswoman Sheehan would actually take a stand to end the wars, the reason the Democrats were voted into office in 2006 in the first place? How horrible that would be.

And would accomplish absolutely nothing in the progress. Hooray!

So you consider the cause of ending the war to be worth "absolutely nothing" in terms of accomplishment?

I see the Democrats have internalized the Bush war-without-end mentality now that they're Obama's wars...

Does this cat really think the Dems ran against the wars in 2006? lol

They ran against BUSH. And Bush's war was Iraq. So they ran against Bush via Iraq. No better way to run against an unpopular President then to run against the unpopular war he started. Thats one thing Dems have in their favor this time. Whereas in 2006, the dems just had to say Iraq 1000 times to win, this year that isn't one think that epitomizes all the things people don't like about Obama.

The American people voted them in to end Bush's war, not just because they didn't like Bush himself.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: June 13, 2010, 05:11:31 AM »

Don't let the high Demoratic percentages in San Francisco fool you. There isn't much on the far left.

Well, combatting stereotypes is good and all, but still, there's more than most places in America. I mean, very few if any other districts would have given Sheehan 16% against someone like Pelosi.

True. But San Francisco is a lot farther right than it is popularly believed to be. It has a rightist mayor.

Gavin Newsom is a right-winger now? LOL how so? The fact that endorsed Hillary in the primaries or the fact that he's been such an outspoken advocate of same-sex marriage?

IIRC the whole same-sex marriage thing happened just after he won a bitterly contested runoff against Matt Gonzales, the more left wing green candidate. And Gavin certainly isn't no raving liberal on fiscal issues, or the homeless, or a host of other issues. He just started the gay marriages in SF to shore up his liberal bonafides after an election where he was portrayed as the "conservative" candidate.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,917
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: June 13, 2010, 07:13:32 AM »

What Xahar was getting at - presumably - was Newsom's actual existing policies wrt running the city, not whether he supports this or that cultural cause.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,252
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: June 13, 2010, 03:48:29 PM »

What Xahar was getting at - presumably - was Newsom's actual existing policies wrt running the city, not whether he supports this or that cultural cause.

     If we are talking about rightist in the sense of defending the status quo, isn't it inevitable that 99.9% of mayors in the United States will be rightist?
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,030
Czech Republic


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: June 13, 2010, 04:33:04 PM »

Who's John Dennis?
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,252
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: June 13, 2010, 04:53:14 PM »


     Ron Paul Republican. I remember reading a section of his platform where he talked about the importance of all different kinds of freedom. Seems like a pretty good guy.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: June 13, 2010, 05:03:18 PM »


     Ron Paul Republican. I remember reading a section of his platform where he talked about the importance of all different kinds of freedom. Seems like a pretty good guy.

And was Dana Walsh the establishment candidate? I know it's SF, but it's still pretty impressive that a Ron Paul republican won a Republican primary.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: June 13, 2010, 05:04:49 PM »


     Ron Paul Republican. I remember reading a section of his platform where he talked about the importance of all different kinds of freedom. Seems like a pretty good guy.

So you have two worthwhile FF candidates, but it's the worthless piece of sh**t that will break 70% there.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,252
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: June 13, 2010, 05:14:09 PM »


     Ron Paul Republican. I remember reading a section of his platform where he talked about the importance of all different kinds of freedom. Seems like a pretty good guy.

And was Dana Walsh the establishment candidate? I know it's SF, but it's still pretty impressive that a Ron Paul republican won a Republican primary.

     She was the nominee in 2008. I know nothing about her besides that.

     Anyway, San Francisco is socially a very liberal place. While there are other places I'd suspect it to be the case of (Marin, New York), San Francisco is the only county that I'd say most likely has more libertarians than populists, & maybe even more libertarians than conservatives. Okay, that last one is probably a pipe dream. Tongue
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,471
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: June 13, 2010, 05:23:21 PM »

I doubt San Francisco has many libertarians at all. Unless you use the rather idiotic "Anyone who is economically conservative but pro-choice and doesn't hate gays" definition. Remember when some people called Rudy Giuliani a libertarian?
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,252
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: June 13, 2010, 05:28:27 PM »

I doubt San Francisco has many libertarians at all. Unless you use the rather idiotic "Anyone who is economically conservative but pro-choice and doesn't hate gays" definition. Remember when some people called Rudy Giuliani a libertarian?

     I doubt San Francisco has many populists at all either.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,471
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: June 13, 2010, 05:30:17 PM »

I doubt San Francisco has many libertarians at all. Unless you use the rather idiotic "Anyone who is economically conservative but pro-choice and doesn't hate gays" definition. Remember when some people called Rudy Giuliani a libertarian?

     I doubt San Francisco has many populists at all either.

At least 8% voted for both Obama and Prop 8.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,252
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: June 13, 2010, 08:03:39 PM »

I doubt San Francisco has many libertarians at all. Unless you use the rather idiotic "Anyone who is economically conservative but pro-choice and doesn't hate gays" definition. Remember when some people called Rudy Giuliani a libertarian?

     I doubt San Francisco has many populists at all either.

At least 8% voted for both Obama and Prop 8.

     At least 41% voted for Obama & against Prop F.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: June 14, 2010, 12:11:42 AM »

What Xahar was getting at - presumably - was Newsom's actual existing policies wrt running the city, not whether he supports this or that cultural cause.

This, more or less. Newsom is allied with the right of the Board of Supervisors, as opposed to the left of Chris Daly, Ross Mirkarimi et al.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,252
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: June 14, 2010, 03:35:03 PM »

What Xahar was getting at - presumably - was Newsom's actual existing policies wrt running the city, not whether he supports this or that cultural cause.

This, more or less. Newsom is allied with the right of the Board of Supervisors, as opposed to the left of Chris Daly, Ross Mirkarimi et al.

     So the fact that a mayor was elected who is rightist in the context of local politics means the city is not as far-left as is thought?
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: June 14, 2010, 04:27:36 PM »

What Xahar was getting at - presumably - was Newsom's actual existing policies wrt running the city, not whether he supports this or that cultural cause.

This, more or less. Newsom is allied with the right of the Board of Supervisors, as opposed to the left of Chris Daly, Ross Mirkarimi et al.

     So the fact that a mayor was elected who is rightist in the context of local politics means the city is not as far-left as is thought?

Not just elected, but reelected unopposed.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.242 seconds with 12 queries.