This forum is tired of Newt attacking the media?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 06:06:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  This forum is tired of Newt attacking the media?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: This forum is tired of Newt attacking the media?  (Read 1770 times)
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: November 13, 2011, 12:01:34 AM »


That's all American politics at the "grassroots" (lol) is at this point. No need to feel bad about something all the other dumbs still preoccupy themselves with. Well, at least on what should be secondary issues.

It's not that I feel bad for the media. They're big boys. They can take it.

It's just that this sort of thing isn't good for the people doing it. It might be politically useful but it distorts a clear picture of the world for those who do it. It helps to give us candidates like Bachmann, Perry, and Cain whose failures should have been pretty obvious to see coming if we were able to step back from the crowd and take an honest look at them.

This mindset stops people from asking difficult questions about themselves. That's the real problem.

I think you have it the other way around. The problem is that many if not most americans lack critical thinking skills now. That's what you get after a lifetime of being taught to regurgitate "facts" in school or listening to people tell you what to think or buy on tv/radio. Maybe they might sense they're getting f**ked over by a few cartels (hmos, "education," contractors, bailed out banks/corps, etc.) and get angry over that. Maybe occasionally they might even realize those are government subsidized and lash out at them too, for a little bit. But then they quickly re-direct the anger to team red or blue or some other "out" group (whites, blacks, gays, mexicans, atheists, city dwellers, fundies, whatever) like they've been taught to. That's why you get "protest" movements like OWS or the Teabaggers. If they could do what you're talking about they wouldn't have that mindset.
Or in your case Gubmint is bad, right?
Logged
courts
Ghost_white
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,484
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: November 13, 2011, 12:23:46 AM »

Yeah bro, that was totally my point.
Logged
memphis
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: November 13, 2011, 04:37:55 AM »

Yes. More distractions from actual policy proposals. I'm not laying off this campaign. I am so fed up with the distractions, fake personalities, and everything else involved in the damn campaigns. Candidates for President, can we please just focus on issues? There are plenty of them to go around.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,868
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: November 13, 2011, 04:58:47 AM »


That's all American politics at the "grassroots" (lol) is at this point. No need to feel bad about something all the other dumbs still preoccupy themselves with. Well, at least on what should be secondary issues.

It's not that I feel bad for the media. They're big boys. They can take it.

It's just that this sort of thing isn't good for the people doing it. It might be politically useful but it distorts a clear picture of the world for those who do it. It helps to give us candidates like Bachmann, Perry, and Cain whose failures should have been pretty obvious to see coming if we were able to step back from the crowd and take an honest look at them.

This mindset stops people from asking difficult questions about themselves. That's the real problem.

I think you have it the other way around. The problem is that many if not most americans lack critical thinking skills now. That's what you get after a lifetime of being taught to regurgitate "facts" in school or listening to people tell you what to think or buy on tv/radio. Maybe they might sense they're getting f**ked over by a few cartels (hmos, "education," contractors, bailed out banks/corps, etc.) and get angry over that. Maybe occasionally they might even realize those are government subsidized and lash out at them too, for a little bit. But then they quickly re-direct the anger to team red or blue or some other "out" group (whites, blacks, gays, mexicans, atheists, city dwellers, fundies, whatever) like they've been taught to. That's why you get "protest" movements like OWS or the Teabaggers. If they could do what you're talking about they wouldn't have that mindset.

It is bad form to attack the media in general. If one has certifiable evidence of bias, then one can generalize about a specific outlet. A politician who finds that the media dislike the content of his campaign or his personal life had better recognize that the Presidency is for one person in 300 million, even if you cut that in half for persons disqualified for being under 35 or not being a natural-born citizen. 

America is severely polarized on cultural lines, and everyone knows that President Obama isn't going to pick up the vote of poor, undereducated, rural white people in the Ozarks, central or southern Appalachia, or the Deep South. A few decades ago they could vote for Democrats like Carter or Clinton, but even that may be past.  Everyone also knows that a southern reactionary is going to do badly in the urban North and among non-white minorities. It all comes down to the 'swing voters' who now seem to be white, middle-class suburbanites.  It used to be that white middle-class suburban voters voted with their bosses whom they trusted. But that trust is gone.     
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.224 seconds with 13 queries.