Absolutely agreed on the Vice President ordeal. It's just a whole mess of an idea.
Predictably, the issue is falling victim to people making mountains out of molehills. For instance, Yelnoc's weird objection as if I'm proposing adding new offices, or depriving good candidates from other offices, which I'm not, which it doesn't. But whatever.
I wanted to respond to Wormyguy's ideas, because at least he's proposing something even if I think it's flawed, as opposed to some people in the Senate who just talk talk talk.
While I applaud the intentions behind this proposal, I believe that it substantively would create major pitfalls that Atlasia would do better to avoid. Specifically, the Vice-President already has the power to break a tied vote in the Senate. Allowing the Vice-President to directly introduce legislation into the Senate would represent a major threat to the separation of powers between the executive and the legislative branches. One of the major checks that the legislative branch has over the executive is that only it can introduce and create legislation, and then the executive is limited to determining whether to sign or to veto that legislation. Allowing the executive to have power over the legislative procress would eliminate one of the few checks the legislative branch still has over the executive. To prevent constitutional abuses of the civil rights of Atlasian citizens, it is necessary to maintain a strict dispersal of power such that no branch can obtain too much.
I am amazed how "No, this distorts separation of powers" was turned into such a bloated paragraph, but okay, sure. I've heard this before and really, to be entirely honest with you, do not see why this matters.
Our system is whatever we make it, and it's not like separation of powers has any serious impact on our little game at the end of the day anyway. I look at this issue from the perspective of "What would make this game work better and the positions in it more meaningful" and not "What would happen in the real world if we did this!"
One of the biggest problems, in my view, is that the executive gets off easy every single time they get in power and then do jack sh** for their entire term. They can do this because there is no official mechanism for directing legislation or bringing forward any sort of plan. For the last year, I can think of only one Administration that has brought forward a plan on their own and accomplished a big idea, and that was Tmth after February of
last year.
I just really don't see why we should continue to let that sort of thing slide, because of some very.. academic objection. It just really doesn't affect us this way and is one of those silly "in character, roleplaying" objections. It's impossible to argue with because it's so meaningless.
I feel an obligation at this point to TLDR these posts for people. Essentially, you're saying we should let the Vice President appoint cabinet officials, and this one piddly little power will apparently balance it out and make it worthwhile and important. I just don't see how this is the case.
You will not solve the problem of Vice Presidential irrelevance by giving it a rarely-used power of appointing cabinet officials. I feel like these proposals are just trying to grasp onto smaller little proposals in an attempt to find some way to excuse having the position in the first place. No one
really wants to solve the problem in a big way, they just want it to have
some reason to exist so boring unity tickets can continue unabated.
This problem needs a big solution, and giving it one little power does not suddenly improve the position to the point that tickets are somehow way heavier and more meaningful and the Vice President has people actively fiending for the job. People will want the job when it has powers and stuff to do, and tickets will stop being ideologically pretzeled when the VP has some serious weight when it comes to governing. The only way to accomplish this is expand on it's pre-existing Senate powers. People have tried desperately to find some way around this and nothing has changed.
We passed and ratified an Amendment four months ago to let the Vice President serve as a cabinet official. How's that going? The answer; It's not. The current P and VP are woefully inactive and no one has even suggested that Bacon King serve any sort of cabinet capacity, and if they have, it's been well hidden.
We have two big and bold options here. Let the Vice President be a Senator too, or get rid of the Vice Presidency. But no one has the balls, apparently, to do either. No one wants to get rid of it, but no one wants to give it any real power either. It's the classic game reform conundrum. You have people sitting on the sidelines once again bitching about a problem that no one wants to solve because no one wants to pay attention to us game reform cranks. So we just waste time. Until people come around, as they usually do. It just takes time to beat pride.