Australian Scientists one big step closer to male contraceptive pill

[Tender Branson]

... and apparently this one has almost no side-effects. But it still takes about 10 years for it to be on the market:

Male contraceptive pilll on the horizon?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.dailylife.com.au/health-and-fitness/dl-wellbeing/male-contraceptive-pilll-on-the-horizon-20131205-2yrol.html

[dead0man]

So is it spermless ejaculate or no ejaculate at all.  Fine if it's the former, no thanks if it's the latter.  I want to see my mess and be ashamed of it.  I suppose I could read the article, but then I wouldn't have an excuse to type "spermless ejaculate".

[Tender Branson]

So is it spermless ejaculate or no ejaculate at all ?

B) The stuff would remain inside, says the article.

But if you don't take the pill anymore, you can ejaculate again.

[dead0man]

So the dude would orgasm, but there would be no "money shot"?  No thanks.


(I had the wife "fixed" so this isn't important to me anyway)

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

So the dude would orgasm, but there would be no "money shot"?  No thanks.


(I had the wife "fixed" so this isn't important to me anyway)

Don't you mena "broken"?

[dead0man]

If she kept having kids I'd be broke......n.


How does this thread not have more replies?

[opebo]

If a white powder were shot out instead, I'd go for it purely for effect.

[tik 🪀✨]

If a white powder were shot out instead, I'd go for it purely for effect.

I agree, but only if we substitute white powder for fireworks.

As an expert ejacuologist, I can say that I think you would still spray spunk, it would just lack your soldiers. Jizz is more than just sperm, and I believe (have no evidence to say that) this only blocks sperm from being mixed into the final product. I'd be game to use it.