Tom Delay or Hillary Clinton - who do you trust?

[MissCatholic]

this is going to be a partisan thread. hillary has never been indicted and probably never will as she respects the law. the scumbag who has been indicted is being portrayed as the victim and a conspiracy theory. but tom delay looks corrupt. you wouldnt trust him as a babysitter. you can always imagine tom delay talking to those corrupt people across the america on thephone screwing over more americans.

[??????????]

Option 1 (Normal)

[dazzleman]

I would trust anybody over Hillary Clinton.  And I mean anybody.

[Grumpier Than Uncle Joe]

or



Hillary, of course, right?

[nini2287]

Neither.  But MissCatholic's right that it probably will be a partisan issue, so Hillary.

[7,052,770]

(normal)

[MODU]

Wow, 3 Democrats, 2 Republicans, and 1 "other" have posted, and the vote is 5 for Delay and 2 for Killary.  Now THAT's funny. 

[jokerman]

Hillary Clinton (Normal)

[Storebought]

Hillary Clinton is a living Queen of Spades, so I choose DeLay

[Giant Saguaro]

I certainly don't trust either one, but I do trust DeLay more than Hillary. They're whole game is winning, that's all they want to do, whatever it is. But Hillary, I believe, would compromise her own values in order to win and I do not necessarily think DeLay would nearly as soon as Hillary. Then there's the issue of ruthlessness, and I think Hillary is far more ruthless than DeLay. Just an impression, call it partisan, I don't know. But the scandals involving DeLay seem more mundane than those involving Hillary too.

[MasterJedi]

Tom Delay (normal)

[ATFFL]

Neither.

[Citizen James]

Neither (normal)

[TeePee4Prez]

Hillary. 

[Sam Spade]

Neither (normal)

[opebo]

Neither are trustworthy, but DeLay is far more corrupt.  Still, once you are soiled with corporate moneys and pandering to the intolerant, what's the difference?