RRH: How MA became Red (Blue)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 07:27:18 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  RRH: How MA became Red (Blue)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: RRH: How MA became Red (Blue)  (Read 939 times)
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 25, 2014, 08:35:46 AM »

Interesting RRH on how the Bay State flipped.
Logged
Representative Joe Mad
Joe Mad
Rookie
**
Posts: 189


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 25, 2014, 11:09:15 AM »

A nice little read, good analysis.  I'm not sure I agree with the theory that, had 1960 been Nixon vs. LBJ Massachusetts would be atlas blue, but overall a very solid piece. 
Logged
muon2
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,823


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 25, 2014, 11:47:01 AM »

As a 1980's resident of MA and a 1990's IL resident, I would heartily endorse the analysis of 1988-92-96 and how it represented the full realignment of New England with Perot as the catalyst. The same data trends appear in many Chicago suburbs, particularly those in Cook during the same period. Reliable Pub areas became unattached and voted with Perot, then went Dem and stayed there from 96 onward. Chicagoland differed in its outer suburbs that stayed Pub, and downstate IL that was following the reverse southern shift.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.216 seconds with 12 queries.