Opinion of Lawrence Auster

[Marnetmar]

No comment.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Auster

[politicus]

No comment.

Why leave out a link to Wiki? Is the article too bad?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Auster

[Marnetmar]

No comment.

Why leave out a link to Wiki? Is the article too bad?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Auster

My bad, thought I put it in OP. Fixed.

[Mr. Smith]

HP is obvious HP...what was the point of this?

[Murica!]

Thank (the probably non-existent but I won't reject the possibility exists) God he's dead.

[Anti Democrat Democrat Club]

Accidentally voted FF. Meant to vote HP. This is why we don't break paradigm

[politicus]

He will get a ton of HP votes here, so it seems pointless to poll him. Circlejerk material.

I partly agree with his critique of the binary and moralistic immigration debate, where consequence analysis is lacking, but he is coming at it from a racialist, anti-liberal angle and he is a homophobe, so automatic HP. It basically invalidates his critique that he is a self identified racialist. If he had argued from a cultural/demographic, social or even environmentalist angle he would have had a legitimate cause. It seems most US immigration sceptics/opponents are racists, which explains why you find it so hard to accept that immigration sceptics from other countries are not necessarily racists.