Should TalkElections use a rainbow logo for pride month?

[wimp]

Since everyone else is doing it.

[afleitch]

It should use a completely different logo every month forever...

[Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden]

It should use a completely different logo every month forever...

A different holiday-themed logo throughout the year would certainly be interesting.

[Diabolical Materialism]

Atlas shouldn't be promoting lifestyles incompatible with the teachings of Jesus Christ.

[Dr. MB]

Yes, but it shouldn't show up to Russian or Middle Eastern users

[Esteemed Jimmy]

No

[Chips]

IDK.

[Lexii, harbinger of chaos and sexual anarchy]

It should use a completely different logo every DAY forever...

Talk Elections should be competing with Google and their Doodles

[Battista Minola 1616]

Atlas shouldn't be promoting lifestyles incompatible with the teachings of Jesus Christ.

Huh, I am a Christian and I had no idea Jesus taught against depicting rainbows. The more you know.

[7,052,770]

Atlas shouldn't be promoting lifestyles incompatible with the teachings of Jesus Christ.

Exactly. This is why we should put the rainbow on the logo, as a stand against bigotry.

[Ferguson97]

I think it would be nice.

[Fuzzy Bear Loves Christian Missionaries]

Atlas shouldn't be promoting lifestyles incompatible with the teachings of Jesus Christ.

Exactly. This is why we should put the rainbow on the logo, as a stand against bigotry.

Christ would have dined with homosexuals in the same spirit he dined with Zaccheus.  He would have defended them from the mob as he did the woman caught in the act of adultery.

But, as with the woman caught in the act of adultery, he would admonish them to "Go, then, and sin no more."  At no time did Jesus Christ sanction ANY other sort of sexual activity, save that of a male husband and his female wife/female wife and her male husband; he made it very plain that anything outside of that was sin.  I could care less about what individuals do in their bedrooms with other consenting adults, but I will not say that God doesn't care, because I believe that He does.  Scripture says that He does care.  (If you're upset with that, take it up with God; see what happens.)

If you think the Bible is a bunch of poppycock, then say so.  I have far more respect for people who assert that than I do for people who claim to be Christians but insist that Scripture says things it plainly does not say.  If you think some parts of it apply today but not others, that's fine as well, but don't come at people claiming Scripture is authoritative, because THAT, in the final analysis is an all-or-nothing proposition if you're going to use Scripture to justify your argument.

I don't abandon my bank or department stores because they put up the Pride logo.  They get to do that.  People get to do a lot of things I, at a minimum would choose not to do.  I, however, get to do lots of things others here would never do.  Tolerance means accepting the OK-ness of that, even if you don't agree with what I'm doing. 

[7,052,770]

Atlas shouldn't be promoting lifestyles incompatible with the teachings of Jesus Christ.

Exactly. This is why we should put the rainbow on the logo, as a stand against bigotry.

Christ would have dined with homosexuals in the same spirit he dined with Zaccheus.  He would have defended them from the mob as he did the woman caught in the act of adultery.

But, as with the woman caught in the act of adultery, he would admonish them to "Go, then, and sin no more."  At no time did Jesus Christ sanction ANY other sort of sexual activity, save that of a male husband and his female wife/female wife and her male husband; he made it very plain that anything outside of that was sin.  I could care less about what individuals do in their bedrooms with other consenting adults, but I will not say that God doesn't care, because I believe that He does.  Scripture says that He does care.  (If you're upset with that, take it up with God; see what happens.)

If you think the Bible is a bunch of poppycock, then say so.  I have far more respect for people who assert that than I do for people who claim to be Christians but insist that Scripture says things it plainly does not say.  If you think some parts of it apply today but not others, that's fine as well, but don't come at people claiming Scripture is authoritative, because THAT, in the final analysis is an all-or-nothing proposition if you're going to use Scripture to justify your argument.

I don't abandon my bank or department stores because they put up the Pride logo.  They get to do that.  People get to do a lot of things I, at a minimum would choose not to do.  I, however, get to do lots of things others here would never do.  Tolerance means accepting the OK-ness of that, even if you don't agree with what I'm doing. 

I must have said so dozens of times...

Jesus is pro-gay. Any Bible passage that implies otherwise is incorrect.

[Fuzzy Bear Loves Christian Missionaries]

Atlas shouldn't be promoting lifestyles incompatible with the teachings of Jesus Christ.

Exactly. This is why we should put the rainbow on the logo, as a stand against bigotry.

Christ would have dined with homosexuals in the same spirit he dined with Zaccheus.  He would have defended them from the mob as he did the woman caught in the act of adultery.

But, as with the woman caught in the act of adultery, he would admonish them to "Go, then, and sin no more."  At no time did Jesus Christ sanction ANY other sort of sexual activity, save that of a male husband and his female wife/female wife and her male husband; he made it very plain that anything outside of that was sin.  I could care less about what individuals do in their bedrooms with other consenting adults, but I will not say that God doesn't care, because I believe that He does.  Scripture says that He does care.  (If you're upset with that, take it up with God; see what happens.)

If you think the Bible is a bunch of poppycock, then say so.  I have far more respect for people who assert that than I do for people who claim to be Christians but insist that Scripture says things it plainly does not say.  If you think some parts of it apply today but not others, that's fine as well, but don't come at people claiming Scripture is authoritative, because THAT, in the final analysis is an all-or-nothing proposition if you're going to use Scripture to justify your argument.

I don't abandon my bank or department stores because they put up the Pride logo.  They get to do that.  People get to do a lot of things I, at a minimum would choose not to do.  I, however, get to do lots of things others here would never do.  Tolerance means accepting the OK-ness of that, even if you don't agree with what I'm doing. 

I must have said so dozens of times...

Jesus is pro-gay. Any Bible passage that implies otherwise is incorrect.

Then make a Scriptural argument to support your position.

[7,052,770]

Atlas shouldn't be promoting lifestyles incompatible with the teachings of Jesus Christ.

Exactly. This is why we should put the rainbow on the logo, as a stand against bigotry.

Christ would have dined with homosexuals in the same spirit he dined with Zaccheus.  He would have defended them from the mob as he did the woman caught in the act of adultery.

But, as with the woman caught in the act of adultery, he would admonish them to "Go, then, and sin no more."  At no time did Jesus Christ sanction ANY other sort of sexual activity, save that of a male husband and his female wife/female wife and her male husband; he made it very plain that anything outside of that was sin.  I could care less about what individuals do in their bedrooms with other consenting adults, but I will not say that God doesn't care, because I believe that He does.  Scripture says that He does care.  (If you're upset with that, take it up with God; see what happens.)

If you think the Bible is a bunch of poppycock, then say so.  I have far more respect for people who assert that than I do for people who claim to be Christians but insist that Scripture says things it plainly does not say.  If you think some parts of it apply today but not others, that's fine as well, but don't come at people claiming Scripture is authoritative, because THAT, in the final analysis is an all-or-nothing proposition if you're going to use Scripture to justify your argument.

I don't abandon my bank or department stores because they put up the Pride logo.  They get to do that.  People get to do a lot of things I, at a minimum would choose not to do.  I, however, get to do lots of things others here would never do.  Tolerance means accepting the OK-ness of that, even if you don't agree with what I'm doing. 

I must have said so dozens of times...

Jesus is pro-gay. Any Bible passage that implies otherwise is incorrect.

Then make a Scriptural argument to support your position.

Why is this so hard for you? I don't believe the Bible is inerrant or literal. I never have. I won't make a "Scriptural argument" on any topic, ever.

[Fuzzy Bear Loves Christian Missionaries]

Atlas shouldn't be promoting lifestyles incompatible with the teachings of Jesus Christ.

Exactly. This is why we should put the rainbow on the logo, as a stand against bigotry.

Christ would have dined with homosexuals in the same spirit he dined with Zaccheus.  He would have defended them from the mob as he did the woman caught in the act of adultery.

But, as with the woman caught in the act of adultery, he would admonish them to "Go, then, and sin no more."  At no time did Jesus Christ sanction ANY other sort of sexual activity, save that of a male husband and his female wife/female wife and her male husband; he made it very plain that anything outside of that was sin.  I could care less about what individuals do in their bedrooms with other consenting adults, but I will not say that God doesn't care, because I believe that He does.  Scripture says that He does care.  (If you're upset with that, take it up with God; see what happens.)

If you think the Bible is a bunch of poppycock, then say so.  I have far more respect for people who assert that than I do for people who claim to be Christians but insist that Scripture says things it plainly does not say.  If you think some parts of it apply today but not others, that's fine as well, but don't come at people claiming Scripture is authoritative, because THAT, in the final analysis is an all-or-nothing proposition if you're going to use Scripture to justify your argument.

I don't abandon my bank or department stores because they put up the Pride logo.  They get to do that.  People get to do a lot of things I, at a minimum would choose not to do.  I, however, get to do lots of things others here would never do.  Tolerance means accepting the OK-ness of that, even if you don't agree with what I'm doing.  

I must have said so dozens of times...

Jesus is pro-gay. Any Bible passage that implies otherwise is incorrect.

Then make a Scriptural argument to support your position.

Why is this so hard for you? I don't believe the Bible is inerrant or literal. I never have. I won't make a "Scriptural argument" on any topic, ever.

In truth, your argument seems to be made out of whole cloth.  I said "seems", but if not Scripture, what else could you base your argument on?

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Well this thread is going great so far!

[The Dowager Mod]

Well this thread is going great so far!

Ya, Get back on topic please.

[RINO Tom]

It should use a completely different logo every DAY forever...

Talk Elections should be competing with Google and their Doodles

We will be the Oregon Football of political message boards!

[S019]

Why do people still argue with Fuzzy, what's the point


Anyways, to answer the question, yes

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

TalkErections surely would've if it were still here.