Trump: Hillary will not be indicted

[IceSpear]

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/donald-trump-clinton-wont-be-indicted-222241

You know it's sad when Donald Trump is more grounded in reality than certain people...

[Indy Texas]

He's basically saying Republicans can't and shouldn't bank on Hillary getting shoved into a police car the day before election day.

We all know Lyin' Ted can't win against a Non-Indicted Hillary, so Trump is arguing their best bet is to go with the high-risk, high-reward option of himself.

[dax00]

Trump's saying she's getting undeserved protection as a result of corruption. May the righteous thing be done - Hillary getting 20+ years in prison with no chance of early release or parole.

[Xing]

I guess even Little Donny says something true every once in a while.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Trump's saying she's getting undeserved protection as a result of corruption. May the righteous thing be done - Hillary getting 20+ years in prison with no chance of early release or parole.

Yes, he clearly was saying she *should* be indicted. But they declined to go after Robert Rubin, either.

http://fortune.com/2016/03/13/robert-rubin-financial-crisis-commission-justice-department/

[SillyAmerican]

Trump's saying she's getting undeserved protection as a result of corruption. May the righteous thing be done - Hillary getting 20+ years in prison with no chance of early release or parole.

Yeah, anyone who thinks that the Obama DoJ will be able to take an apolitical position on the email server issue is simply fooling themselves. Lynch will do everything she can to keep Hillary safe. Despite what we'd like to believe, the law is never applied blindly, and having a powerful name is always of benefit. That said, if Clinton believes her GOP opponent will leave benghazi and the email server out of the political discussion, she needs to think again.

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

Wow - two utter crackpots in a thread not even a page old.

[dax00]

Wow - two utter crackpots in a thread not even a page old.

Ad hominem attacks - lowest rung of rhetoric - are for those who find themselves feeble in the field of facts. For it is clear that she is guilty, so an FBI indictment would mean inescapable demise.

A Clinton landslide loss would be good for true liberals - a (hopefully) final shift leftwards of the Overton window. Real left-wing progressives are in dire need of a Tea Party counterpart.

[MATTEROFFACTREPUBLICAN]

Mr. Trump...eh excuse me, what about your high jinks over Trump University? Nothing much about that, is there?

[Mallow]

...For it is clear that she is guilty...

"If I say it enough, it will become true. If I say it enough, it will become true. If I say it enough, it will become true..."

[BlueSwan]

Real left-wing progressives are in dire need of a Tea Party counterpart.

Only if they want the Republicans to utterly dominate national politics for the foreseeable future. Anyting else is delusional, just like the actual Tea Partiers.

[🦀🎂🦀🎂]

Wow - two utter crackpots in a thread not even a page old.

Ad hominem attacks - lowest rung of rhetoric - are for those who find themselves feeble in the field of facts. For it is clear that she is guilty, so an FBI indictment would mean inescapable demise.

A Clinton landslide loss would be good for true liberals - a (hopefully) final shift leftwards of the Overton window. Real left-wing progressives are in dire need of a Tea Party counterpart.

Hilarious.

[SillyAmerican]

...For it is clear that she is guilty...

"If I say it enough, it will become true. If I say it enough, it will become true. If I say it enough, it will become true..."

Ah yes, the Hillary Clinton supporter's mantra. Clearly there's nothing to these investigations. So please join hands and repeat after me...