Was the 2000 election the realignment that created the current map we have now?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 02:33:06 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Was the 2000 election the realignment that created the current map we have now?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Was the 2000 election the realignment that created the current map we have now?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No (other year)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 12

Author Topic: Was the 2000 election the realignment that created the current map we have now?  (Read 1435 times)
Make My Bank Account Great Again
KingCharles
Rookie
**
Posts: 201
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 08, 2016, 01:35:56 AM »

...or was it another election?

The 2000-2016 trend map looks eerily similar to the 2012-2016 map so there wasn't any political realignment this time around.
Logged
mencken
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,222
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2016, 09:31:50 AM »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I would say the current alignment has been around for a while (excepting West Virginia, and now Iowa and Ohio)
Logged
The_Doctor
SilentCal1924
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,272


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2016, 11:01:04 AM »

I think it was a confirming election of the Reagan era. W. was the heir to Reagan just as JFK was the heir to FDR and William McKinley was Lincoln's ideological heir. The service economy needed a service economy President ... and thus, W 43.

The 2000 election also cemented the Party's Southern roots and re-centered it officially as the Party of Reagan (the West & South) while the North and Pacific Coast peeled off. Similar things kind of happened in 1896 and 1960. 

Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,062
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 08, 2016, 11:41:47 AM »

Single elections have never caused a total realignment of a map.
Logged
NeverAgain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,659
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 08, 2016, 12:06:57 PM »

Single elections have never caused a total realignment of a map.

This.

It wasn't the cause, but it was the start of the next 5 (or more) elections. States like VA, NC, CO, etc. have been grafted in to the mold, but all in all this swing state map has stayed basically the same for 2000 to 2016. I would say it will stay the same until at least 2024.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,175


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 08, 2016, 12:15:43 PM »

Single elections have never caused a total realignment of a map.

Um 1932
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,062
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 08, 2016, 02:47:21 PM »


What about it?  Al Smith made significant inroads to Northern industrial areas that had long been Republican, and - even with vote splitting - Woodrow Wilson arguably laid the foundation for that trend.

But, with Computer89, all statements about politics have to fit nicely into a paragraph of a text book.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,175


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 08, 2016, 03:13:18 PM »


What about it?  Al Smith made significant inroads to Northern industrial areas that had long been Republican, and - even with vote splitting - Woodrow Wilson arguably laid the foundation for that trend.

But, with Computer89, all statements about politics have to fit nicely into a paragraph of a text book.

My  PS class in college said that 1932 election was one of the few elections where everything realigned in one election
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,062
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 08, 2016, 04:02:26 PM »


What about it?  Al Smith made significant inroads to Northern industrial areas that had long been Republican, and - even with vote splitting - Woodrow Wilson arguably laid the foundation for that trend.

But, with Computer89, all statements about politics have to fit nicely into a paragraph of a text book.

My  PS class in college said that 1932 election was one of the few elections where everything realigned in one election

What if there are other professors or textbook writers around the world who might disagree?
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 12, 2016, 12:13:05 PM »

No, 1992 was.  2000 was only a regional realignment of Appalachia to the GOP.
Logged
Lechasseur
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,799


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 05, 2017, 06:18:42 AM »
« Edited: October 05, 2017, 06:41:21 AM by Lechasseur »

No, 1992 was.  2000 was only a regional realignment of Appalachia to the GOP.

Basically this (Appalachia+Arkansas+Louisiana+Missouri)
Logged
dw93
DWL
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,889
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 10, 2017, 05:50:17 PM »

2000 and 2004 were the end result of a realignment that has roots going back to 1964.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,354
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 11, 2017, 01:26:40 PM »


What about it?  Al Smith made significant inroads to Northern industrial areas that had long been Republican, and - even with vote splitting - Woodrow Wilson arguably laid the foundation for that trend.

But, with Computer89, all statements about politics have to fit nicely into a paragraph of a text book.

My  PS class in college said that 1932 election was one of the few elections where everything realigned in one election

Well he was wrong.
Logged
Dr. MB
MB
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,900
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 14, 2017, 10:19:56 PM »

The whole period from the mid 60s to the early 2000s was a realignment. It didn't happen overnight. 2000 was the completion (at least presidentially, it was different at the local levels still for another decade or so).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.231 seconds with 15 queries.