Mitt Romney vs Jill Stein

[President Johnson]

Mitt.

[Human]

Mitt Romney, easily.

[Since I'm the mad scientist proclaimed by myself]

Voted Jill Stein because not right wing, but thinking about it I'm not so sure I made the right choice.

EDIT: Starting to think Romney

[pho]

Here you'll see all the "pro-science" Dems vote for the "anti-science" wingnut because she's liberal.

Uh, she's not liberal. She's actually closer to far right than anything liberal seeing as how she's basically owned by Putin.

You have posted something to this effect a few times, but have yet to demonstrate a single instance in which Stein hasn't come down on the side of standard social democrat dogma. Are you still bitter about Nader accepting money from conservatives in 2004 or something?

[Sir Mohamed]

Mitt, the lesser of two evils.

[🦀🎂🦀🎂]

Here you'll see all the "pro-science" Dems vote for the "anti-science" wingnut because she's liberal.

Uh, she's not liberal. She's actually closer to far right than anything liberal seeing as how she's basically owned by Putin.

You have posted something to this effect a few times, but have yet to demonstrate a single instance in which Stein hasn't come down on the side of standard social democrat dogma. Are you still bitter about Nader accepting money from conservatives in 2004 or something?

Haha that's a can of worms you shouldn't open round brtd

[#TheShadowyAbyss]

Romney enthusiastically

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Romney reluctantly. Both have gone different directions since 2012, Romney for the better, Stein for the worse.

[Lyin' Steve]

Romney is smart, competent, mature, clearheaded, and obviously capable of handling the duties of the office.  Stein is an aggravating lunatic trying to exploit idiots for attention and cash.  Unsurprising that she's at 30-35%.  And yet Atlas has the nerve to complain when Trump gets 40% automatically for being Republican.

[Xing]

Romney, reluctantly. Stein is just completely nuts.

[You don't see any blue avatars now]

Romney reluctantly. Both have gone different directions since 2012, Romney for the better, Stein for the worse.

[Torie]

LOL at this thread.

[AGA]

Romney since he is actually qualified for president. Jill Stein has a lot of extreme positions that I do not support, but I guess that it would not matter that much since Congress would prevent her from getting a lot of things done.

[Horus]

Romney and it wouldn't be close.

[Monolith]

Romney.

[Chunk Yogurt for President!]

[Kempros]

The economy and the environment are trade offs. You decide which you prefer.