NWA Polling & Research Co. VIII
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 03:51:30 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  NWA Polling & Research Co. VIII
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: If you could cast you vote in the October 2008 presidential election again, who would you vote for?
#1
Bgwah/Meeker
 
#2
Afleitch/Mr. Moderate
 
#3
EarlAW/Al
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 19

Author Topic: NWA Polling & Research Co. VIII  (Read 2792 times)
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 27, 2009, 10:48:59 PM »

If you could re-cast your vote in the October election, who would you vote for? This is open for three days.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2009, 11:02:38 PM »

All of them
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,215
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2009, 12:33:32 AM »

     Bgwah/Meeker. I was thinking the other day about how maybe afleitch might have been nice to have as President & then I remembered why the RPP opposed afleitch so vehemently.
Logged
afleitch
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,925


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2009, 08:14:07 AM »

     Bgwah/Meeker. I was thinking the other day about how maybe afleitch might have been nice to have as President & then I remembered why the RPP opposed afleitch so vehemently.

I've never actually understood that, considering I was pushing to increase regional authority and allow for the creation of new regions, or the transferral of some states to others. I think I even spoke at your convention too.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,215
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2009, 01:34:13 PM »
« Edited: January 28, 2009, 01:37:01 PM by Senator PiT »

     Bgwah/Meeker. I was thinking the other day about how maybe afleitch might have been nice to have as President & then I remembered why the RPP opposed afleitch so vehemently.

I've never actually understood that, considering I was pushing to increase regional authority and allow for the creation of new regions, or the transferral of some states to others. I think I even spoke at your convention too.

     Perhaps I was hallucinating when I thought you said that you supported eliminating the regions?

     EDIT: I found the specific quote. While it wasn't nearly as bad as I remembered, I don't want to have gerrymandered regions.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 28, 2009, 01:42:01 PM »

I still would've supported Bgwah.
Logged
afleitch
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,925


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 28, 2009, 01:46:59 PM »

     Bgwah/Meeker. I was thinking the other day about how maybe afleitch might have been nice to have as President & then I remembered why the RPP opposed afleitch so vehemently.

I've never actually understood that, considering I was pushing to increase regional authority and allow for the creation of new regions, or the transferral of some states to others. I think I even spoke at your convention too.

     Perhaps I was hallucinating when I thought you said that you supported eliminating the regions?

     EDIT: I found the specific quote. While it wasn't nearly as bad as I remembered, I don't want to have gerrymandered regions.

It's not gerrymandering when people get to vote on whether they want to remain in one region or another. The people would get to choose, as opposed to the current arrangement which was decided by politicians a few years back. I support strong regional government, if it meant people in neighbouring states voted to join the 'Dirty' South or the Mideast, or The Pacific region chose to split etc. As I said at the time - more regional government, not less.

I've found myself unfairly 'treated' by the RPP for some time for supposedly holding views that I don't have Smiley I'm used to it.
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 28, 2009, 02:25:19 PM »

     Bgwah/Meeker. I was thinking the other day about how maybe afleitch might have been nice to have as President & then I remembered why the RPP opposed afleitch so vehemently.

I've never actually understood that, considering I was pushing to increase regional authority and allow for the creation of new regions, or the transferral of some states to others. I think I even spoke at your convention too.

     Perhaps I was hallucinating when I thought you said that you supported eliminating the regions?

     EDIT: I found the specific quote. While it wasn't nearly as bad as I remembered, I don't want to have gerrymandered regions.

It's not gerrymandering when people get to vote on whether they want to remain in one region or another. The people would get to choose, as opposed to the current arrangement which was decided by politicians a few years back. I support strong regional government, if it meant people in neighbouring states voted to join the 'Dirty' South or the Mideast, or The Pacific region chose to split etc. As I said at the time - more regional government, not less.

I've found myself unfairly 'treated' by the RPP for some time for supposedly holding views that I don't have Smiley I'm used to it.

Are'nt we all Afleitch, apparently you can't care about regions unless you're an RPP supporter.
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 28, 2009, 10:56:41 PM »

     Bgwah/Meeker. I was thinking the other day about how maybe afleitch might have been nice to have as President & then I remembered why the RPP opposed afleitch so vehemently.

I've never actually understood that, considering I was pushing to increase regional authority and allow for the creation of new regions, or the transferral of some states to others. I think I even spoke at your convention too.

     Perhaps I was hallucinating when I thought you said that you supported eliminating the regions?

     EDIT: I found the specific quote. While it wasn't nearly as bad as I remembered, I don't want to have gerrymandered regions.

It's not gerrymandering when people get to vote on whether they want to remain in one region or another. The people would get to choose, as opposed to the current arrangement which was decided by politicians a few years back. I support strong regional government, if it meant people in neighbouring states voted to join the 'Dirty' South or the Mideast, or The Pacific region chose to split etc. As I said at the time - more regional government, not less.

I've found myself unfairly 'treated' by the RPP for some time for supposedly holding views that I don't have Smiley I'm used to it.

Are'nt we all Afleitch, apparently you can't care about regions unless you're an RPP supporter.

In case you haven't noticed, our party has taken very kindly to non-RPPers who support regional rights, such as Torie, AndrewCT, Franzl, and Bgwah. It isn't our fault that you failed to have a sufficiently pro-region record in the senate.
Logged
afleitch
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,925


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 29, 2009, 08:00:02 AM »

It isn't our fault that you failed to have a sufficiently pro-region record in the senate.

Define what a 'pro-region record' in the Senate is, considering that the Senate primarily concerns itself with federal matters and this is reflected in the legislation on the floor.
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 29, 2009, 05:06:54 PM »

It isn't our fault that you failed to have a sufficiently pro-region record in the senate.

Define what a 'pro-region record' in the Senate is, considering that the Senate primarily concerns itself with federal matters and this is reflected in the legislation on the floor.

He abstained on a vote to abolish regional senate seats.
Logged
afleitch
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,925


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 29, 2009, 05:19:42 PM »

It isn't our fault that you failed to have a sufficiently pro-region record in the senate.

Define what a 'pro-region record' in the Senate is, considering that the Senate primarily concerns itself with federal matters and this is reflected in the legislation on the floor.

He abstained on a vote to abolish regional senate seats.

So abstaining makes someone anti-region now!
Logged
HappyWarrior
hannibal
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,058


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -0.35

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 30, 2009, 12:31:42 AM »

It isn't our fault that you failed to have a sufficiently pro-region record in the senate.

Define what a 'pro-region record' in the Senate is, considering that the Senate primarily concerns itself with federal matters and this is reflected in the legislation on the floor.

He abstained on a vote to abolish regional senate seats.

I don't remember such a thing, and even if I did at least I did not vote for it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.235 seconds with 14 queries.