AZ-03 and NE-02: new DCCC targets
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 11, 2024, 11:07:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  AZ-03 and NE-02: new DCCC targets
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: AZ-03 and NE-02: new DCCC targets  (Read 976 times)
MarkWarner08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,812


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 09, 2008, 10:26:16 PM »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QH-bwmaMKA&feature=user

This is ad is part of the new $~270K ad buy the DCCC. The DCCC is also planning a $200k barrage in NE-02. What do Democrats Bob Lord and Jim Esch share in common, besides both running against entrenched Republicans in previously safe GOP districts? Both are young rising stars who have outperformed expectations by campaign prognosticators.

Do y'all think these are races the DCCC should be targeting?
Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,836
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2008, 11:50:37 PM »

I can't vouch for either of those districts specifically but I do know spending more money in NE-2 can't hurt Obama's chances there.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 10, 2008, 12:07:37 PM »

$200,000 in NE-02?  Their first option, flushing $200,000 down the toilet, must not have been available.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,523
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2008, 12:31:06 PM »

$200,000 in NE-02?  Their first option, flushing $200,000 down the toilet, must not have been available.

How much is McCain spending in Iowa per week?
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2008, 12:32:16 PM »

NE-02 is probably an attempt to bolster the Democratic brand there for Obama's benefit, not a serious attempt to win the seat.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,064


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 10, 2008, 12:42:48 PM »

These are districts in states that McCain is taking for granted and Obama is writing off, so there's no Republican volunteer apparatus to counter. Shadegg is a lazy incumbent, to boot.
Logged
MarkWarner08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,812


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 10, 2008, 01:00:50 PM »

These are districts in states that McCain is taking for granted and Obama is writing off, so there's no Republican volunteer apparatus to counter. Shadegg is a lazy incumbent, to boot.

John Shadegg is also a paranoid incumbent. I remember Cole saying something to that effect last year.  Maybe his paranoia is justified ...
Logged
Dan the Roman
liberalrepublican
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,644
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 10, 2008, 01:13:47 PM »

$200,000 in NE-02?  Their first option, flushing $200,000 down the toilet, must not have been available.

As was spending money late in the game on Nancy Boyda in 2006? This was a 54-46 race in 2006, the Democrat has vastly more money, Lee Terry has had scandal trouble, and can be linked to the finance meltdown which does affect Omaha. I would not right this seat off.
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 10, 2008, 01:50:55 PM »

$200,000 in NE-02?  Their first option, flushing $200,000 down the toilet, must not have been available.

As was spending money late in the game on Nancy Boyda in 2006? This was a 54-46 race in 2006, the Democrat has vastly more money, Lee Terry has had scandal trouble, and can be linked to the finance meltdown which does affect Omaha. I would not right this seat off.

Indeed, I think Democrats are genuinely interested in make a half-assed $200,000 play for this seat.  I'm not sure that it helps Obama much, unless this was a $200,000 organizational buy—it seems more that the DSCC is leeching off of Obama's investment, and not backing it up themselves.
Logged
Dan the Roman
liberalrepublican
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,644
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 10, 2008, 03:15:25 PM »

This does not speak to confidence on Terry's party.

http://swingstateproject.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=3397
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 10, 2008, 05:33:39 PM »

A $200,000 ad buy translates into a race where the DCCC sees *opportunity*, but is unsure whether their advertising will have an *impact*.  In other words, it's a test.

If the ad buy is followed by subsequent ad buys over the next couple of weeks - you can answer the question in the affirmative; if not, answer it in the negative.

As for AZ-03, the DCCC has been spending tons of money here, so they must see some opportunity.  They've also been spending tons of money in AZ-01, AZ-05 and AZ-08.  How McCain "coattails", however small or large they will be (but they will exist to some extent) will affect things is unknown.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.231 seconds with 12 queries.