2010 gubernatorial results by CD

[JohnnyLongtorso]

Courtesy Greg Giroux.

Bernero won the four Dem-held Detroit-area districts, and that's it (MI-12 by 5%, MI-13 and 14 by huge margins, and MI-15 by 1.5%). Snyder carried MI-05 (Kildee) by 1%, and MI-09 (Peters) by 25.5%.

Edit: And here's NM. NM-01 went for Martinez by 3%, NM-02 for Martinez by 21%, and NM-03 for Denish by 1%.

Here's California, which I posted in the Congressional forum a while back.

I crunched the numbers for Iowa:

IA-01 - Branstad 50.3, Culver 46.9
IA-02 - Culver 50.0, Branstad 46.2
IA-03 - Branstad 50.7, Culver 44.1
IA-04 - Branstad 53.7, Culver 41.7
IA-05 - Branstad 64.7, Culver 32.0

Ohio.

NH:

NH-01 - Lynch 51.0, Stephen 47.0 (Senate: Ayotte 62.5, Hodes 34.5)
NH-02 - Lynch 54.4, Stephen 43.2 (Senate: Ayotte 57.7, Hodes 39.2)

[FEMA Camp Administrator]

Snyder carried MI-09 (Peters) by 25.5%.

Well at least my district voted the right person for Governor (although I thought Peters was in 8 ).

[krazen1211]

Losing MI-05...wow. You know Granholm and company really screwed the pooch.

[nclib]

Bernero even lost Wayne County aside from the two Detroit districts. Is it a given that Wayne County - Detroit would be similar?

[JohnnyLongtorso]

I added Iowa and California numbers to the first post.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

I crunched the numbers for some Minnesota districts:

MN-01:
Dayton 39.81%
Emmer 45.59%
Horner 12.91%
Other 1.70%

MN-08:
Dayton 48.22%
Emmer 40.54%
Horner 9.75%
Other 1.50%

[JohnnyLongtorso]

Greg Giroux did the numbers for Ohio here, both for Governor and Senate. Strickland won OH-01, 06, 09, 10, 11, 13, and 17. Fisher only won OH-09, 11, and 17.

[nclib]

Cool, I had been trying to calculate that. I can't believe that Kucinich's district went for Portman.

Looking at the Wisconsin Senate results, it appears that Feingold won only WI-2 and WI-4, and that he underperformed in swing areas, and was left with his base.

[Dgov]

Cool, I had been trying to calculate that. I can't believe that Kucinich's district went for Portman.

Looking at the Wisconsin Senate results, it appears that Feingold won only WI-2 and WI-4, and that he underperformed in swing areas, and was left with his base.

It's not all that democratic--I think Obama got less than 60% there, and Portman did about 20 points better than McCain did in 2008, so it makes sense that it would flip.

[JohnnyLongtorso]

Just figured out New Hampshire:

NH-01 - Lynch 51.0, Stephen 47.0 (Senate: Ayotte 62.5, Hodes 34.5)
NH-02 - Lynch 54.4, Stephen 43.2 (Senate: Ayotte 57.7, Hodes 39.2)