How much damage would... (with maps)

[old timey villain]

^^^^ Thank you, thank you

Why do you think Bush and the Republicans were able to successfully run against the mainstream media in 2004? Because there were some news outlets that dared to be less than jingoistic about Bush's poorly planned war on terror.

[Simfan34]

Obama would survive it because he's the unsinkable Barack.

If it was with a woman, the MSM would say it's an indictment of the rightwingers who thought he was gay.

If it was with a man (Reggie Love anyone?), then the MSM would proclaim him a historic figure and indict any opposition to him or his policies as the product of anti-homosexual Christianity.  Most of the commenters here would agree.

Are you serious? You have no idea what you're talking about.

Who is insinuating Obama's gay? I hate it when the idea of being gay is thrown around like some insult, a great horrible thing, and it's most agitating when people go about accusing people married with children are gay with clearly malicious intent. But even who is saying this?

It being a man wouldn't be all that different except for the added shock layer of homosexuality.

[angus]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I think it would surprise if Obama was doing somebody else.  With Romney, I think it would be less surprising, even if it was a 12 year old boy, although I'd still vote for him.  I suppose Obama still wins DC, Minnesota, CA, MA, RI, and his home states (HI and IL) in any case.  He probably also wins CT, VT, OR, WA, DE, and MD.  He has to play hard in all the rest in the case of a sex scandal.  With Romney, if he has a sex scandal, especially with a 12 year old boy, he still wins WY, UT, MT, ID, AL, MS, TX, OK, KS, GA, TN, AK, SD, ND, IN, and AZ.  Louisiana and Colorado go to whichever candidate is proven to have had sex with a 12 year old boy. 

[WhyteRain]

Well, if Romney was caught having diaper sex with a prostitute, he'd still win Louisiana.

1.  When and where did "the U.S. government support Al Qaeda in the 1980s"?

From an article after the 1998 embassy bombings

You must be logged in to read this quote.

There you have it, Senator Hatch, who could become 3rd in line for the Presidency next year, said it was worth it to help Bin Laden.

There I have it, a quote that doesn't mention "Al-Qaeda".  Do I need to repeat the question?