MA: Mideast Abortion Sex Protection Act (Statute)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 03:02:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  MA: Mideast Abortion Sex Protection Act (Statute)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MA: Mideast Abortion Sex Protection Act (Statute)  (Read 911 times)
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 29, 2013, 04:54:52 PM »
« edited: October 15, 2013, 02:55:13 PM by Obama's favorite human will killing drug sloth »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
[/quote]
Sponsor: Oldiesfreak1854
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 01, 2013, 05:16:17 PM »

Seeing no debate, this is brought to a final vote.  Members will vote AYE, NAY, or ABSTAIN.  This will be a 48-hour vote.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 01, 2013, 05:18:46 PM »

AYE
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 01, 2013, 05:27:57 PM »

Aye
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,698
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2013, 07:44:44 AM »

Nay
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,764
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 03, 2013, 11:27:49 AM »

Aye
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,574
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 03, 2013, 11:33:21 AM »

Nice to see the ME govnermnet infringing on the rights of women. Then again this is what I would expect from a reactionary Fedralist government.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,764
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 03, 2013, 11:42:06 AM »

Sex selection based abortion is an evil in other countries that we refuse to have here.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,574
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 03, 2013, 12:50:10 PM »

Siren explained it best. This is just an unecessary and excesive regulation.
Logged
ZuWo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,873
Switzerland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 03, 2013, 02:27:08 PM »

Nice to see the ME govnermnet infringing on the rights of women. Then again this is what I would expect from a reactionary Fedralist government.

A government which supports major infrastructure projects, environmentally-friendly policies and seeks to lower excise taxes for the common man. You can call us many things, but the term "reactionary" strikes me as odd.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,574
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 03, 2013, 02:31:10 PM »

Nice to see the ME govnermnet infringing on the rights of women. Then again this is what I would expect from a reactionary Fedralist government.

A government which supports major infrastructure projects, environmentally-friendly policies and seeks to lower excise taxes for the common man. You can call us many things, but the term "reactionary" strikes me as odd.

Okay, so only reactionary against women, gotcha
Logged
ZuWo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,873
Switzerland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 03, 2013, 02:35:44 PM »

Nice to see the ME govnermnet infringing on the rights of women. Then again this is what I would expect from a reactionary Fedralist government.

A government which supports major infrastructure projects, environmentally-friendly policies and seeks to lower excise taxes for the common man. You can call us many things, but the term "reactionary" strikes me as odd.

Okay, so only reactionary against women, gotcha

There is nothing reactionary about seeking to prevent sex-selective abortions. This is actually a measure against sex-based discrimination. Also, requiring a woman to have a conversation with a doctor before an abortion makes a lot of sense to me. It is common practice that patients meet their doctors before undergoing medical treatment in order to receive all the information they need.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,574
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 03, 2013, 03:25:26 PM »

Assuming we're talking about the legal time frame (first trimester), a woman should not have to justify her choice for having an abortion.  Period.  This legislation treats women like potential criminals instead of patients that need care and help.  If you want to provide pamphlets and brochures, I'm hesitant about it but I can accept it.  Interrogation is completely beyond the pale.

Secondly, most customary tests that women undergo to determine the sex of the baby happen after the first trimester, around 14-20 weeks in so this is basically just excessive big government, like Gass mentioned.

Siren says it better than I could have.
Logged
ZuWo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,873
Switzerland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 03, 2013, 03:26:46 PM »

The bill merely uses the verbs "consult" (with a licensed physician) and "explain" (reasons for the abortion). I am not sure where the notion comes from that women will be treated like potential criminals and undergo a nerve-racking interrogation because of this bill. This can include pamphlets and brochures in some cases and mere five-minute conversations in others.

Most people consult with their dentist before having a tooth removed. I don't think it's excessive to demand that a doctor speaks to a woman before a considerably more drastic medical procedure such as an abortion.
Logged
ZuWo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,873
Switzerland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 03, 2013, 03:46:07 PM »
« Edited: October 03, 2013, 03:49:05 PM by ZuWo »

I would also like to stress that this bill is well within the range of similar abortion regulations in a large number of European countries. In Switzerland, Austria and Germany, for example, a woman can only get a legal abortion within the first 12 weeks of her pregnancy if she agrees to a detailed conversation with a licensed physician or, in some cases, if she can confirm in written form that she is in an emergency situation.
Logged
ZuWo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,873
Switzerland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 03, 2013, 04:03:16 PM »

An abortion is a drastic measure which not only affects the woman in question but also the fetus inside her womb. It's also a medical procedure which can have negative impacts on a woman's psyche. While many women may feel relieved after an abortion, there are women who regret their decision or were forced to get an abortion by their partners or parents in the first place. At any rate, an abortion is more than a simple and harmless medical procedure; an abortion always has tangible effects. For this reason a mandatory medical consultation, which, as I pointed out, is very common in many European countries, seems more than appropriate to me.
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 03, 2013, 06:59:06 PM »

Nice to see the ME govnermnet infringing on the rights of women. Then again this is what I would expect from a reactionary Fedralist government.
The real infringement on the rights of women is when they get an abortion simply because the baby is a girl.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 03, 2013, 07:33:57 PM »

Voting is now closed.  The AYEs are 3, and the NAYs are 2.  The AYEs have it, and the bill has passed.  The bill is now passed onto the Governor for his signature or veto.
Logged
DemPGH
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,755
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 04, 2013, 11:54:05 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Why? And what in the name of all things good does that entail? That's exceedingly troubling, and the language implies that she is seeking some form of permission. Legally, it's not a doctor's business what her reasons are.

And does the Mideast impose a ban on abortion after the first trimester?
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,698
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 04, 2013, 11:59:35 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Why? And what in the name of all things good does that entail? That's exceedingly troubling, and the language implies that she is seeking some form of permission. Legally, it's not a doctor's business what her reasons are.

And does the Mideast impose a ban on abortion after the first trimester?

I didn't even think we had a ban until halfway through the second trimester, but I could be misremembering or the region's abortion laws could've been changed since then.
Logged
DemPGH
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,755
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 04, 2013, 03:37:01 PM »

Thanks, Siren.

Yeah, that appears to restrict beyond federal law, so we'll be reviewing this. In the meantime, I would encourage the governor to veto this bill. This is an unnecessary intrusion into the personal life and privacy of a woman. And then there's federal law.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I don't understand why it's the Mideast's concern what a woman's personal reasons are for having an abortion. Any licensed physician who provides abortion services will consult the patient from a medical perspective, that's standard. But not from a personal perspective. That's no one's business but the woman's. She can make her own decisions, and she does not need to approach her physician as though he is the teacher of the class or something. 
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,698
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 12, 2013, 08:58:39 PM »

Has this abortion automatically become law or is ZuWo waiting until he thinks that no one is watching to sign it? (Or maybe he's already succeeded at doing the latter?)

I don't think he signed it yet.
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 14, 2013, 03:25:02 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Why? And what in the name of all things good does that entail? That's exceedingly troubling, and the language implies that she is seeking some form of permission. Legally, it's not a doctor's business what her reasons are.

And does the Mideast impose a ban on abortion after the first trimester?
I was trying to ensure that Asian women wouldn't be racially profiled.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.233 seconds with 13 queries.