Who is more likely to win between these GOP candidates?

[Senator Cris]

Who is more likely to win between these GOP candidates?

[BaconBacon96]

Dan Sullivan, followed by Thom Tillis. Accidentally voted Tillis.

[Senator Cris]

I have resetted the poll. Now, you can vote for Sullivan

[LeBron]

Tough call between Ernst and Tillis, but I'll go with the latter since Tillis isn't as toxic and North Carolina's more red than Iowa. Braley can still blow it, though.

As for Sullivan, he has an uphill climb. Begich has the money, the in-state connections, plus there will be higher turnout in Alaska than originally believed last year. And Gardner's chances are just diminishing.

[eric82oslo]

Because she's a woman, Joni Ernst.

Otherwise Dan Sullivan I guess, because he's fairly moderate in a traditionally Republican state.

[Never]

Tillis, closely followed by Sullivan. Ernst isn't out of the woods just yet regarding her chances, and Gardner is definitely lagging behind Udall right now.

[IceSpear]

Ernst

[backtored]

Gardner

[SWE]

Tillis

[Maxwell]

Ernst, followed by Tillis, followed by Sullivan, followed by Gardner. Their chances are all relatively similar, though.

[ElectionsGuy]

Tillis, closely followed by Sullivan.

[Person Man]

Tillis, closely followed by Sullivan.

[TDAS04]

Sullivan or Tillis.  Voted Sullivan. 

[Maxwell]

Of these, Sullivan is probably the highest quality candidate, though Gardner is close. Tillis and Ernst are pretty bad, but are succeeding due to the sheer terribleh of Braley and the who? factor of Kay Hagan.

[Free Bird]

Tough call between Ernst and Tillis, but I'll go with the latter since Tillis isn't as toxic and North Carolina's more red than Iowa. Braley can still blow it, though.

As for Sullivan, he has an uphill climb. Begich has the money, the in-state connections, plus there will be higher turnout in Alaska than originally believed last year. And Gardner's chances are just diminishing.

When there hasn't been a poll in forever -_-

[GaussLaw]

Tough call between Ernst and Tillis, but I'll go with the latter since Tillis isn't as toxic and North Carolina's more red than Iowa. Braley can still blow it, though.

As for Sullivan, he has an uphill climb. Begich has the money, the in-state connections, plus there will be higher turnout in Alaska than originally believed last year. And Gardner's chances are just diminishing.

When there hasn't been a poll in forever -_-

Yeah Upshot has CO at 57/43 Udall (chances, not spread in actual election) and we don't know where that race is heading. 

I think it's:
1. Sullivan
2. Ernst
3. Gardner
4. Tillis

Tillis is just not liked by North Carolinians very much at all.  He really needs to rehabilitate his image.

[Person Man]

Tough call between Ernst and Tillis, but I'll go with the latter since Tillis isn't as toxic and North Carolina's more red than Iowa. Braley can still blow it, though.

As for Sullivan, he has an uphill climb. Begich has the money, the in-state connections, plus there will be higher turnout in Alaska than originally believed last year. And Gardner's chances are just diminishing.

When there hasn't been a poll in forever -_-

Yeah Upshot has CO at 57/43 Udall (chances, not spread in actual election) and we don't know where that race is heading. 

I think it's:
1. Sullivan
2. Ernst
3. Gardner
4. Tillis

Tillis is just not liked by North Carolinians very much at all.  He really needs to rehabilitate his image.

I think there would be a poll tomorrow unless the major outlets let a major swing state go unpolled for an entire calendar month. A lot has happened in Colorado in the last month, too. There have been some pretty serious allegations into the ethics of the local Republican party, there's the personhood thing (where Gardner says he's both for it and against it) and the "truce" on the fracking situation. On the other hand, there was a "scandal" where it is insinuated that Hickenlooper might permanently block an execution if he is not reelected, instead of doing so on an indefinite basis as he is doing now.