December 2014: +252,000; 5.6%
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 11, 2024, 06:04:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Economics (Moderator: Torie)
  December 2014: +252,000; 5.6%
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: December 2014: +252,000; 5.6%  (Read 8117 times)
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,258
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: January 13, 2015, 01:57:23 PM »

I'm not one of those who blames Obama at all for the economy let alone believes he has enough power to control it. This is a decent accomplishment for the nation, and we finally have a small uptick in employment, but I hope it is still the earlier stages of a trend. We are still nowhere near pre-recession employment levels.



This may be the most misleading graph I've seen in a while.
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,807
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: January 13, 2015, 02:25:32 PM »

I love this site, but I'd really appreciate if more people posted responses as to why something is horrible rather than just dropping that one line. It's far from just you Sol (and I hate calling you out because you seem to usually have really solid replies to posts), but could you please elaborate?

I don't see what I'm misleading people about. Should I have just included the last 2 years? I was trying to show optimism with recent growth in that figure finally showing consistent progress, but I figured having the comparison to pre-08 economy was relevant. The figure itself it quite common. If I wanted to voice my disapproval I would have went into the age demographics and showed how poor that number is for under 55's.
Logged
AggregateDemand
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,873
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: January 13, 2015, 09:01:55 PM »

There's nothing inherently wrong with not participating in the labor force.

Liberals have sugar-plum-fairy fantasies about handing out subsidies to everything with a pulse. If we're going to continue the avarice of the current welfare state for seniors and unemployed youth, we need labor force participation around 75%

Work is like exercise. There are virtually no negative consequences, and the reluctance of some political factions to create opportunity is holding us all back.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: January 13, 2015, 09:58:39 PM »

If we're going to continue the avarice of the current welfare state for seniors and unemployed youth, we need labor force participation around 75%


If we had the latter, we wouldn't have the former...
Logged
Sol
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,258
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: January 13, 2015, 10:30:39 PM »

I love this site, but I'd really appreciate if more people posted responses as to why something is horrible rather than just dropping that one line. It's far from just you Sol (and I hate calling you out because you seem to usually have really solid replies to posts), but could you please elaborate?

I don't see what I'm misleading people about. Should I have just included the last 2 years? I was trying to show optimism with recent growth in that figure finally showing consistent progress, but I figured having the comparison to pre-08 economy was relevant. The figure itself it quite common. If I wanted to voice my disapproval I would have went into the age demographics and showed how poor that number is for under 55's.

Sorry. My main beef with the graph is that it cuts out everything below 58, making it look like, at a glance, that it fell from very high to near zero when in fact it is only a few percentage points.
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,807
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: January 13, 2015, 10:33:57 PM »

I love this site, but I'd really appreciate if more people posted responses as to why something is horrible rather than just dropping that one line. It's far from just you Sol (and I hate calling you out because you seem to usually have really solid replies to posts), but could you please elaborate?

I don't see what I'm misleading people about. Should I have just included the last 2 years? I was trying to show optimism with recent growth in that figure finally showing consistent progress, but I figured having the comparison to pre-08 economy was relevant. The figure itself it quite common. If I wanted to voice my disapproval I would have went into the age demographics and showed how poor that number is for under 55's.

Sorry. My main beef with the graph is that it cuts out everything below 58, making it look like, at a glance, that it fell from very high to near zero when in fact it is only a few percentage points.

Oh I gotcha. I thought it might be a beef with a failed statistic which would have needed explaining. I totally get dimensions being used to trick most of the population, but I think people on here got it. I'll work on that for next time. Smiley
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.212 seconds with 10 queries.