If Warren ran instead of Sanders
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 09:49:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  If Warren ran instead of Sanders
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Would she be leading Hillary right now?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No, but she would've before the debate
 
#3
No, but a Biden/Warren joint ticket would
 
#4
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 65

Author Topic: If Warren ran instead of Sanders  (Read 2279 times)
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: October 23, 2015, 09:59:50 PM »

I'm not sure she'd be doing as well as he is, which is surprising. I think the fact that Bernie openly identifies as a socialist and doesn't run away from it pours gasoline on the fire of his base, the highly educated white progressives that have a major online presence. However, Bernie also appeals to the rebellious Ron Paul crowd (notice that whatever excitement/online following/comment spam crew Rand Paul had has fizzled out since Sanders has gained momentum.) Warren would be "just another liberal" to this crowd.


Worst meme.

The idea of Ron Paul supporters who were a mix of Paleoconservatives and Libertarians. liking bernie sanders is mainly based on a misunderstanding that they were attracted to Ron Paul only mainly because of non-interventionism when Ron Paul had a strong pull from ultra-free market believers. Of which i doubt bernie is getting support from.
Ron Paul received a great deal of support from Libertarians, but I can attest being a socialist who changed my registration to Republican to vote for Ron Paul in the primaries, because Ron Paul (a much better person and campaigner than his son, by the way) was the only mainstream candidate who was speaking out against policing the world. Ultimately, I ended up voting for Romney because I liked the man, and also as a protest vote against Obama.

You're a socialist whose big issue is less military intervention and you voted for Romney?
Logged
Lexii, harbinger of chaos and sexual anarchy
Alex
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,151
Argentina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: October 23, 2015, 10:14:09 PM »

I'm not sure she'd be doing as well as he is, which is surprising. I think the fact that Bernie openly identifies as a socialist and doesn't run away from it pours gasoline on the fire of his base, the highly educated white progressives that have a major online presence. However, Bernie also appeals to the rebellious Ron Paul crowd (notice that whatever excitement/online following/comment spam crew Rand Paul had has fizzled out since Sanders has gained momentum.) Warren would be "just another liberal" to this crowd.


Worst meme.

The idea of Ron Paul supporters who were a mix of Paleoconservatives and Libertarians. liking bernie sanders is mainly based on a misunderstanding that they were attracted to Ron Paul only mainly because of non-interventionism when Ron Paul had a strong pull from ultra-free market believers. Of which i doubt bernie is getting support from.
Ron Paul received a great deal of support from Libertarians, but I can attest being a socialist who changed my registration to Republican to vote for Ron Paul in the primaries, because Ron Paul (a much better person and campaigner than his son, by the way) was the only mainstream candidate who was speaking out against policing the world. Ultimately, I ended up voting for Romney because I liked the man, and also as a protest vote against Obama.

You're a socialist whose big issue is less military intervention and you voted for Romney?
I really wish Manchin would run. He'd have my vote.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,173


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: October 23, 2015, 11:14:15 PM »

I think some of you are underestimating the extent to which the "first woman president" thing helps Clinton.  Warren would neutralize that, and still be able to draw support from the party's left that Sanders is currently getting.  Not saying she'd win, but do better than Sanders?  Yes, absolutely.


I think people tend to underestimate that when it comes to the general election, too.

It's weird that Hillary being a woman was a major news story every day in 2008, but hardly anyone is mentioning it now.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,838


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: October 23, 2015, 11:42:46 PM »

I think some of you are underestimating the extent to which the "first woman president" thing helps Clinton.  Warren would neutralize that, and still be able to draw support from the party's left that Sanders is currently getting.  Not saying she'd win, but do better than Sanders?  Yes, absolutely.


I think people tend to underestimate that when it comes to the general election, too.

It's weird that Hillary being a woman was a major news story every day in 2008, but hardly anyone is mentioning it now.

There are certainly a lot of people in the Democratic party who will vote for a non white male with sh**tty views over a white male with good views.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.234 seconds with 15 queries.