Is it right?/Should it be legal?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 06:17:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Is it right?/Should it be legal?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: In the scenario given, Is it right for parents to force their child of age, say, 15, to attend religious service against the wishes of said child?/Should it be legal?
#1
Yes/Yes [
#2
No/No
#3
Yes/No
#4
No/Yes
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: Is it right?/Should it be legal?  (Read 5689 times)
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,727
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: July 19, 2007, 02:01:26 PM »

No/Yes, kids shouldn't have to go unless they want to but they are kids and by that subject to their parents rules.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,596


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: July 19, 2007, 07:24:47 PM »

No/Yes, kids shouldn't have to go unless they want to but they are kids and by that subject to their parents rules.

So a 15 year old should die if their idiot parents are Jehovah's Witnesses and don't believe in blood transfusions, but the 15 year old isn't religious?
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,727
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: July 19, 2007, 07:28:35 PM »

No/Yes, kids shouldn't have to go unless they want to but they are kids and by that subject to their parents rules.

So a 15 year old should die if their idiot parents are Jehovah's Witnesses and don't believe in blood transfusions, but the 15 year old isn't religious?

Yes, because that's exactly what I said! Roll Eyes There are obvious differences between being forced to go to church if you don't want to and that situation you mentioned above. Obviously laws should be different for those types of situations. Not like someone as, I'll take a page from Jfern here *shudder*, batsh**t crazy as you could possibly understand that or want it to be put into any argument.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,596


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: July 19, 2007, 07:30:34 PM »

You said that they're kids and that they're subject to their parents' rules.  I was just seeing how far you were willing to go with that statement.  How about an infant who can't make any religious decisions, and their parents want to deny him a life-saving blood transfusion?
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,727
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: July 19, 2007, 07:36:36 PM »

You said that they're kids and that they're subject to their parents' rules.  I was just seeing how far you were willing to go with that statement.  How about an infant who can't make any religious decisions, and their parents want to deny him a life-saving blood transfusion?

Obviously laws should be different for those types of situations.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,596


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: July 19, 2007, 07:42:33 PM »

You said that they're kids and that they're subject to their parents' rules.  I was just seeing how far you were willing to go with that statement.  How about an infant who can't make any religious decisions, and their parents want to deny him a life-saving blood transfusion?

Obviously laws should be different for those types of situations.

Great non-answer.
Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: July 19, 2007, 08:08:43 PM »

No/No.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,727
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: July 19, 2007, 08:10:40 PM »

You said that they're kids and that they're subject to their parents' rules.  I was just seeing how far you were willing to go with that statement.  How about an infant who can't make any religious decisions, and their parents want to deny him a life-saving blood transfusion?

Obviously laws should be different for those types of situations.

Great non-answer.

Yes, I sure didn't answer. Roll Eyes Neither of you like to read into what people say. He gave an example and I said obviously laws should be different for those types of situations. The kid would die, meaning the law shouldn't allow the parent to kill the kid.
Logged
Redefeatbush04
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,504


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: July 20, 2007, 12:39:20 AM »

You said that they're kids and that they're subject to their parents' rules.  I was just seeing how far you were willing to go with that statement.  How about an infant who can't make any religious decisions, and their parents want to deny him a life-saving blood transfusion?

Obviously laws should be different for those types of situations.

Great non-answer.

Yes, I sure didn't answer. Roll Eyes Neither of you like to read into what people say. He gave an example and I said obviously laws should be different for those types of situations. The kid would die, meaning the law shouldn't allow the parent to kill the kid.

Obviously a line has to be drawn somewhere - under no circumstances should someone die when they wish to live ..... especially if their death brings about no greater good. It is one thing to force your offspring to attend  your religious services .....in time they will formulate their own opinions - another entirely when you strip them of the opportunity to ever do so. I believe that the legal limit on the parents juristiction should be when it causes observable psychological or physical harm.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: July 20, 2007, 10:33:18 AM »

It's not morally right at that age, but it should be legal since the child is still a minor.

In the long run, forcing a child to go to church against their will makes them less likely to want to go to church in the future; it's quite counterproductive if the intent of the parent is to make the child more religious.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.232 seconds with 14 queries.