NM-Rasmussen: Udall leads both Pearce & Wilson by double-digits
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 04:19:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  2008 Senatorial Election Polls
  NM-Rasmussen: Udall leads both Pearce & Wilson by double-digits
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NM-Rasmussen: Udall leads both Pearce & Wilson by double-digits  (Read 1310 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 10, 2008, 01:30:12 PM »

Udall: 54%
Pearce: 40%

Udall: 56%
Wilson: 36%

.....

Udall: 62% favorable - 29% unfavorable
Pearce: 49% favorable - 40% unfavorable
Wilson: 43% favorable - 52% unfavorable

.....

This telephone survey of 500 Likely Voters was conducted by Rasmussen Reports on April 8, 2008. The margin of sampling error for the survey is +/- 4.5 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence.

Link
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,196
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2008, 01:37:21 PM »

For the Republicans, the 2008 Senate elections will be hardly better than the ones in 2006:

Democrats are about to win CO, NM, VA, NH - AK is close - probably MN and OR as well ?

Begich, Novick and Franken still have some work to do to make their races close, but in all 3 states Obama could help them out with his turnout coattails.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,617
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2008, 05:13:11 PM »

What's with Richardson's terrible numbers?
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 10, 2008, 05:37:13 PM »

What's with Richardson's terrible numbers?

It's the beard.
Logged
ottermax
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,800
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.09

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 10, 2008, 05:40:42 PM »


Didn't Kerry's approval rating go down after losing in 2004. Maybe that's why.
Logged
Padfoot
padfoot714
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,531
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 10, 2008, 11:18:22 PM »


Didn't Kerry's approval rating go down after losing in 2004. Maybe that's why.

Maybe it has something to do with the nastiness coming from the Clintons over his Obama endorsement.

lol on Wilson's numbers.  I really hope they nominate her.  Not that it matters since it looks as if Udall shouldn't have a hard time beating Pearce either.
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 11, 2008, 04:22:11 PM »

What's with Richardson's terrible numbers?

I know - he was consistently popular up until now. 
Logged
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,703
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 13, 2008, 04:46:13 PM »

Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.219 seconds with 14 queries.