Obama/Richardson vs. McCain/Romney
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 03:15:56 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Obama/Richardson vs. McCain/Romney
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Obama/Richardson vs. McCain/Romney  (Read 1052 times)
GPORTER
gporter
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 08, 2008, 04:22:36 PM »

Clinton takes it to the convention. Looses narrowly on the first ballot after a floor fight and she concedes the race and endorses Obama. Obama accepts the nomination and he selects Bill Richardson as his running mate.

McCain wins the nomination unamiously and he selects Mitt Romney as his running mate.

Discuss with maps.
Logged
SomeLawStudent
Rookie
**
Posts: 211


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2008, 04:25:55 PM »

Clinton takes it to the convention. Looses narrowly on the first ballot after a floor fight and she concedes the race and endorses Obama. Obama accepts the nomination and he selects Bill Richardson as his running mate.

McCain wins the nomination unamiously and he selects Mitt Romney as his running mate.

Discuss with maps.

I don't know what the map would look like exactly, but McCain wins between 35-38 states.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 08, 2008, 04:29:07 PM »

Could the candidates make worse VP picks, or is that possible?
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,161


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 08, 2008, 04:29:23 PM »

If it goes to the convention and the party is still bitterly divided, then it may be bad news for Obama.



McCain 348
Obama 190
Logged
SomeLawStudent
Rookie
**
Posts: 211


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 08, 2008, 04:31:47 PM »

If it goes to the convention and the party is still bitterly divided, then it may be bad news for Obama.



McCain 348
Obama 190

This looks about right.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,101
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 08, 2008, 04:36:53 PM »

Wow, those are some maps!  They look like a 6% to 8% margin of victory. The Dems if they know what's good for them should nominate Clinton!  Smiley
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,007


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 08, 2008, 04:43:57 PM »

If the nomination goes to the convention, as was presented in this scenario, then McCain wins. There's really no way around that.

Generic Obama/Richardson vs. McCain/Romney with Clinton dropping out in early June:

Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,317


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 08, 2008, 04:45:05 PM »

Wow, those are some maps!  They look like a 6% to 8% margin of victory. The Dems if they know what's good for them should nominate Clinton!  Smiley

This will only happen if the party is still divided in november and if Clinton somehow magically gets the nomination, I guarantee you the party will be divided and a similar result will occur. Ohio might vote dem though LOL.
Logged
Fmr. Pres. Duke
AHDuke99
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,161


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -3.13

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 08, 2008, 04:46:29 PM »

If the nomination goes to the convention, as was presented in this scenario, then McCain wins. There's really no way around that.

Generic Obama/Richardson vs. McCain/Romney with Clinton dropping out in early June:



LOL

Of course! Virginia flipping is back!

You may be right, but I just can't see him taking Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Mexico with over 60%, crossing 60% in Massachusetts, and MI and WI with no trouble. But I am the hack and you are just a level minded, nonbias poster.
Logged
Colin
ColinW
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,684
Papua New Guinea


Political Matrix
E: 3.87, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 08, 2008, 04:52:10 PM »
« Edited: May 08, 2008, 04:55:24 PM by Colin »

My current prediction is a slight McCain victory:



Obama isn't able to capture enough blue-collar support in either Ohio or Pennsylvania to win. Both are quite close though. Obama continues to do well in the Mountain West. He is also able to keep McCain under 60% everywhere in the Great Plains, save Oklahoma.

McCain: 285 EVs
Obama: 253 EVs

Oh I just completely disregarded the VPs since I think their mutual sh**ttiness cancels out any effect they might have. If these are the two VP candidates somebody from both campaigns should be shot for stupidity.
Logged
FerrisBueller86
jhsu
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 507


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 09, 2008, 01:33:15 PM »

Why would McCain pick Romney?  They didn't like each other.  More importantly, I can't imagine what Romney would contribute to the ticket.  Do people really want a Massachusetts flip-flopper to be just one heartbeat away from the presidency after that very party has spent the last 20 years insisting that being from Massachusetts should disqualify presidential candidates? 

Imagine a world in which Democrats have spent the last 20 years demonizing Wyoming and Democratic Gov. David Freudenthal decided not to run for re-election in 2006 (because his approval rating was 30% instead of 70%) so he could run for president.  Everyone would be talking about how the party that demonized Wyoming and insisted that nobody from the state could be president now has somebody from Wyoming on the ticket.

McCain is trying to mend fences with the extreme right wing, but picking Romney would throw those efforts away.  Then there's also the fact that a key part of the Republican base hates Mormons.  (I still can't believe that.  You'd think there would be a sense of solidarity.)  Surely, there are plenty of Republicans with better conservative credentials than Romney.  Putting Romney on the ticket would mean that only Utah and Idaho would be safe McCain states.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,862


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 09, 2008, 02:11:49 PM »

My current prediction is a slight McCain victory:



Obama isn't able to capture enough blue-collar support in either Ohio or Pennsylvania to win. Both are quite close though. Obama continues to do well in the Mountain West. He is also able to keep McCain under 60% everywhere in the Great Plains, save Oklahoma.

McCain: 285 EVs
Obama: 253 EVs

Oh I just completely disregarded the VPs since I think their mutual sh**ttiness cancels out any effect they might have. If these are the two VP candidates somebody from both campaigns should be shot for stupidity.

My map's almost the same as yours, but I do give NH (which isn't going GOP, even for John McCain, this year), and...barely...PA to Obama, for a tiny Obama win.  I'm somewhat tempted to give CO back to McCain and get the 269-269.
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,667
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 09, 2008, 02:14:26 PM »

I think  Obama should start ignoring Hillary. This is really Hillary's 2012 race at this point.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.235 seconds with 11 queries.