Would you snitch on your political opponent?

[Scam of God]

RAWR I WAS SUPPOSED TO BE THE FIRST MINORITY IN THE WHITE HOUSE

[Queen Mum Inks.LWC]

It's either one of 2 things:

1. Snitch line which will be used to make a blacklist of WH enemies (not saying it's not possible - it just seems a little paranoid).
2. A way to help shape White House communications/propaganda/etc... on health care reform.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

It's either one of 2 things:

1. Snitch line which will be used to make a blacklist of WH enemies (not saying it's not possible - it just seems a little paranoid).
2. A way to help shape White House communications/propaganda/etc... on health care reform.

Both of which seem great to me.

[Zarn]

Hmm... shouldn't your social stance be a positive 7.48 rather than -7.48?

[Person Man]

Hmm... shouldn't your social stance be a positive 7.48 rather than -7.48?

I don't know why....its not like we are trying to arrest people. We are just going around and figuring out how people are lying so we can set the record straight. What would you do if people were defaming you or your ideas behind your back when it mattered? We can't sue these people for defamation because their communications are qualified. Our hands are tied and this is the most ethical and effective way of getting our message out.

[Zarn]

Hmm... shouldn't your social stance be a positive 7.48 rather than -7.48?

I don't know why....its not like we are trying to arrest people. We are just going around and figuring out how people are lying so we can set the record straight. What would you do if people were defaming you or your ideas behind your back when it mattered? We can't sue these people for defamation because their communications are qualified. Our hands are tied and this is the most ethical and effective way of getting our message out.

You aren't seeing the irony in this?

[Mechaman]

Hmm... shouldn't your social stance be a positive 7.48 rather than -7.48?

I don't know why....its not like we are trying to arrest people. We are just going around and figuring out how people are lying so we can set the record straight. What would you do if people were defaming you or your ideas behind your back when it mattered? We can't sue these people for defamation because their communications are qualified. Our hands are tied and this is the most ethical and effective way of getting our message out.

You aren't seeing the irony in this?

[Scam of God]

Hmm... shouldn't your social stance be a positive 7.48 rather than -7.48?

I don't know why....its not like we are trying to arrest people. We are just going around and figuring out how people are lying so we can set the record straight. What would you do if people were defaming you or your ideas behind your back when it mattered? We can't sue these people for defamation because their communications are qualified. Our hands are tied and this is the most ethical and effective way of getting our message out.

You aren't seeing the irony in this?

I see double irony, in that either of you pretend to have a negative social score. You yourself go out of your way to defend torture.

[Torie]

I don't know what the fuss is about, and to me it is not even snitching. Statements made on the internet are not private. This is kind of an odd thread. I don't get it.