Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 18, 2013, 06:53:56 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: True Federalist)
| | |-+  Results by Northern and Southern California
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Author Topic: Results by Northern and Southern California  (Read 4530 times)
Alexander Hamilton
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9395
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13

View Profile
« Reply #25 on: August 29, 2009, 06:19:02 am »
Ignore

San Benito?

I was going to say the same thing.

The eastern part that is.

Anyway. If a partition of California was to occur, it would best be Bay Area and the rest of the state.

That wouldn't make sense.

Why not? CA Politics is basically Bay Area vs the Rest of CA.

     I think that the political consensus between Los Angeles & the entire Northeastern quadrant of the state is rather limited.

All 12 of the people there?
Logged

people suck
memphis
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12543


Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -3.83


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: August 29, 2009, 08:15:42 am »
Ignore

San Benito?

I was going to say the same thing.

The eastern part that is.

Anyway. If a partition of California was to occur, it would best be Bay Area and the rest of the state.

That wouldn't make sense.

Why not? CA Politics is basically Bay Area vs the Rest of CA.

     I think that the political consensus between Los Angeles & the entire Northeastern quadrant of the state is rather limited.

All 12 of the people there?
Maybe not by California standards, but there are a decent number of people living near Tahoe. I don't think they have much in common with LA or San Diego.
Logged

Alexander Hamilton
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9395
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13

View Profile
« Reply #27 on: August 29, 2009, 11:59:00 am »
Ignore

San Benito?

I was going to say the same thing.

The eastern part that is.

Anyway. If a partition of California was to occur, it would best be Bay Area and the rest of the state.

That wouldn't make sense.

Why not? CA Politics is basically Bay Area vs the Rest of CA.

     I think that the political consensus between Los Angeles & the entire Northeastern quadrant of the state is rather limited.

All 12 of the people there?
Maybe not by California standards, but there are a decent number of people living near Tahoe. I don't think they have much in common with LA or San Diego.

And they do with the Bay?
Logged

people suck
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56582
Vatican City State


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: August 29, 2009, 12:10:20 pm »
Ignore

They do. If anything, a Bay-based state should extend into NW Nevada.
Logged

Liberate yourself from Free Will


Kitty's beardgrowing advice to Mitty.
Senator Sbane
sbane
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12171


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: August 30, 2009, 09:27:12 am »
Ignore

San Benito?

I was going to say the same thing.

The eastern part that is.

Anyway. If a partition of California was to occur, it would best be Bay Area and the rest of the state.

That wouldn't make sense.

Why not? CA Politics is basically Bay Area vs the Rest of CA.

     I think that the political consensus between Los Angeles & the entire Northeastern quadrant of the state is rather limited.

All 12 of the people there?
Maybe not by California standards, but there are a decent number of people living near Tahoe. I don't think they have much in common with LA or San Diego.

And they do with the Bay?

Umm yeah.... Everything in life doesn't have to be based on how many percentage points their county gave to the democrats or republicans.
Logged
Senator Sbane
sbane
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12171


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: August 30, 2009, 09:29:33 am »
Ignore

San Benito?

I was going to say the same thing.

The eastern part that is.

Anyway. If a partition of California was to occur, it would best be Bay Area and the rest of the state.

That wouldn't make sense.

Why not? CA Politics is basically Bay Area vs the Rest of CA.

As I said to Hamilton, politics isn't everything. Regardless if the divisions should just be on political lines, shouldn't it be the bay and LA vs the rest of the state?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory