Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 20, 2013, 12:38:21 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2012 Elections (Moderators: Mr. Morden, Bacon King, Big DaddyTX)
| | |-+  Republicans, here's a question
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] Print
Poll
Question: Which potential nominee(s) would make you vote for Obama?
Mitt Romney   -9 (9.1%)
Mike Huckabee   -11 (11.1%)
Sarah Palin   -19 (19.2%)
Rudy Giuliani   -5 (5.1%)
Newt Gingrich   -3 (3%)
Rick Santorum   -13 (13.1%)
Tim Pawlenty   -1 (1%)
Gary Johnson   -6 (6.1%)
Ron Paul   -14 (14.1%)
Bobby Jindal   -2 (2%)
Eric Cantor   -2 (2%)
Jeb Bush   -1 (1%)
Haley Barbour   -3 (3%)
Mitch Daniels   -1 (1%)
Charlie Crist   -2 (2%)
Mike Pence   -0 (0%)
Other   -1 (1%)
I'll vote for the Republican no matter who it is   -6 (6.1%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 42

Author Topic: Republicans, here's a question  (Read 4483 times)
Χahar
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36855
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: 0.26

View Profile
« Reply #50 on: August 26, 2009, 09:50:38 pm »
Ignore

What is everybody's beef with Gary Johnson?

He's weird.
Logged

You kip if you want to...
change08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8034
United Kingdom


View Profile
« Reply #51 on: August 27, 2009, 10:49:28 am »
Ignore

What is everybody's beef with Gary Johnson?

He's weird.

He's to Ron Paulish, right?
Logged


OC
olawakandi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8398
United States


View Profile
« Reply #52 on: August 27, 2009, 11:10:38 am »
Ignore

Newt Gingrich, Jeb Bush for obvious reasons, and Sarah Palin.  They didn't fulfill what they set out to do during their turn in office, but want to use the Presidency to fulfill that, and I don't think that is what the presidency is for.
Logged
paul718
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4045


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: -4.35

View Profile
« Reply #53 on: August 27, 2009, 11:36:41 am »
Ignore

Newt Gingrich, Jeb Bush for obvious reasons, and Sarah Palin.  They didn't fulfill what they set out to do during their turn in office, but want to use the Presidency to fulfill that, and I don't think that is what the presidency is for.

Can you expound on that?  What did they "set out to do" in their last positions?
Logged
Farage
Elvis Republican
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 398
Cape Verde


View Profile
« Reply #54 on: August 27, 2009, 12:37:31 pm »
Ignore

What is everybody's beef with Gary Johnson?

He's weird.

He's to Ron Paulish, right?
he's pro-drugs and totally anti-conservative
Logged
Senator Libertas
Libertas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14848
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -6.43

View Profile
« Reply #55 on: August 27, 2009, 12:55:11 pm »
Ignore

he's pro-drugs and totally anti-conservative
Gary Johnson is pro-drugs? First I've heard that, if I recall he neither smokes nor drinks. Perhaps you meant to say he is anti-police state?
Logged
rebeltarian
rebel_libertarian
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 288


View Profile
« Reply #56 on: September 01, 2009, 11:12:20 pm »
Ignore

What is everybody's beef with Gary Johnson?

He's weird.

He's to Ron Paulish, right?
he's pro-drugs and totally anti-conservative

Being "pro-drugs" is actually a conservative position.  The War on Drugs and other sorts of prohibition have a long track record of failure and wasted money.  Conservatism is supposed to be logical, anti-corruption and economically efficient.
Logged

"Under the rules of morality, we have no authority to force others to behave as we believe they should, and force American citizens to pay for it, not only with dollars, but with life and limb as well.  By the rules of common sense, the role of world policemen is a dangerous game and not worth playing."  -- Congressman Ron Paul

Economic Score: +5.68
Personal Score: -3.83
nhmagic
azmagic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.62, S: 4.61

View Profile
« Reply #57 on: September 02, 2009, 01:05:14 am »
Ignore

What is everybody's beef with Gary Johnson?

He's weird.

He's to Ron Paulish, right?
he's pro-drugs and totally anti-conservative

Being "pro-drugs" is actually a conservative position.  The War on Drugs and other sorts of prohibition have a long track record of failure and wasted money.  Conservatism is supposed to be logical, anti-corruption and economically efficient.
Yes that is correct.  Even William F. Buckley spoke of this.  Buckley actually once surmised that we could legalize drugs, tax them heavily and create drug stores where if people left the stores on a high then they could be placed in prison.  I think that was him at least.
Logged
SenatorShadowLands
Rookie
*
Posts: 43
United States


View Profile
« Reply #58 on: September 02, 2009, 06:21:44 pm »
Ignore

Paul could at least be relied upon to be an economic conservative and I'd really have to hold my nose to vote for Mittens. Otherwise it doesn't matter to me.
Logged

Political Matrix: Economic Score: +9.32 Social Score: +10.0

My 2010 PA Endorsements:

Pat Toomey for Senate:
http://www.toomeyforsenate.com/site/c.nkLVJ6MMKrH/b.5302129/k.953F/The_Official_Campaign_Website_for_Pat_Toomey_for_US_Senate.htm

Tom Corbett for Governor:
http://tomcorbettforgovernor.com/
pogo stick
JewishConservative
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3596
United States


View Profile
« Reply #59 on: September 02, 2009, 06:29:51 pm »
Ignore

Paul could at least be relied upon to be an economic conservative and I'd really have to hold my nose to vote for Mittens. Otherwise it doesn't matter to me.

I have a question, How is it possible to get a +9.00 Fiscal score and maintain a social score over +5.00?

Just asking.
Logged

Economic score: -6.80
Social score: -0.97
I'm a crazy Liberal  Troll. LAWL

ndvc ,b., b


CRAZY GAY TROLL LIBRAL FROM ALABAMAS
Alabama is dum redecks!


Gays and minorites are sexeh
SenatorShadowLands
Rookie
*
Posts: 43
United States


View Profile
« Reply #60 on: September 02, 2009, 06:59:53 pm »
Ignore

Paul could at least be relied upon to be an economic conservative and I'd really have to hold my nose to vote for Mittens. Otherwise it doesn't matter to me.

I have a question, How is it possible to get a +9.00 Fiscal score and maintain a social score over +5.00?

Just asking.

Beats me, that's how it came out on PM (which labeled me as a "reactionist" up in the top right hand corner of the matrix), I took a different survey that made my economics over 9 yet my social was 4.8 so that other survey would agree with you, PM seems to be in a different world from that survey however.
Logged

Political Matrix: Economic Score: +9.32 Social Score: +10.0

My 2010 PA Endorsements:

Pat Toomey for Senate:
http://www.toomeyforsenate.com/site/c.nkLVJ6MMKrH/b.5302129/k.953F/The_Official_Campaign_Website_for_Pat_Toomey_for_US_Senate.htm

Tom Corbett for Governor:
http://tomcorbettforgovernor.com/
Χahar
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36855
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: 0.26

View Profile
« Reply #61 on: September 02, 2009, 07:05:41 pm »
Ignore

What is everybody's beef with Gary Johnson?

He's weird.

He's to Ron Paulish, right?
he's pro-drugs and totally anti-conservative

Being "pro-drugs" is actually a conservative position.  The War on Drugs and other sorts of prohibition have a long track record of failure and wasted money.  Conservatism is supposed to be logical, anti-corruption and economically efficient.

That doesn't make any sense. Whenever something is stupid, opposing it is conservative?
Logged

zclark1994
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 55
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -1.04

View Profile
« Reply #62 on: September 02, 2009, 07:52:54 pm »
Ignore

This poll doesn't really carry any significance because it's like asking Clinton voters if obama's the nominee will you vote for McCain.  A majority said they would either not vote or vote for McCain, and then they voted for Obama.  The truth, the majority of republicans probably won't vote for Obama no matter who the nominee is.  That may not be true for moderate republicans or independents, but for the majority of the party, it's a fact.
Logged

To suggest that a party is going extinct simply because of recent unpopularity is utterly ridiculous.
rebeltarian
rebel_libertarian
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 288


View Profile
« Reply #63 on: September 03, 2009, 12:34:56 am »
Ignore

What is everybody's beef with Gary Johnson?

He's weird.

He's to Ron Paulish, right?
he's pro-drugs and totally anti-conservative

Being "pro-drugs" is actually a conservative position.  The War on Drugs and other sorts of prohibition have a long track record of failure and wasted money.  Conservatism is supposed to be logical, anti-corruption and economically efficient.

That doesn't make any sense. Whenever something is stupid, opposing it is conservative?

Whenever something is more idealistic than realistic, opposing it is conservative.
Logged

"Under the rules of morality, we have no authority to force others to behave as we believe they should, and force American citizens to pay for it, not only with dollars, but with life and limb as well.  By the rules of common sense, the role of world policemen is a dangerous game and not worth playing."  -- Congressman Ron Paul

Economic Score: +5.68
Personal Score: -3.83
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9546
Czech Republic


View Profile
« Reply #64 on: September 03, 2009, 10:51:29 am »
Ignore

This poll doesn't really carry any significance because it's like asking Clinton voters if obama's the nominee will you vote for McCain.  A majority said they would either not vote or vote for McCain, and then they voted for Obama.  The truth, the majority of republicans probably won't vote for Obama no matter who the nominee is.  That may not be true for moderate republicans or independents, but for the majority of the party, it's a fact.
Logged

Clearly the solution is to privatize presidential elections.

So, in less than four years, get excited for the 2016 MetLife Financial U Pick The Prez Extravaganza. If you tweet a picture of your completed ballot with the hashtag #ivoted, you could win a trip for two to the inauguration or an iTunes gift card.
Pages: 1 2 [3] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory