Republicans, here's a question (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 02:54:48 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Republicans, here's a question (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which potential nominee(s) would make you vote for Obama?
#1
Mitt Romney		  
#2
Mike Huckabee		  
#3
Sarah Palin		  
#4
Rudy Giuliani		  
#5
Newt Gingrich		  
#6
Rick Santorum		  
#7
Tim Pawlenty		  
#8
Gary Johnson		  
#9
Ron Paul		  
#10
Bobby Jindal		  
#11
Eric Cantor		  
#12
Jeb Bush		  
#13
Haley Barbour		  
#14
Mitch Daniels		  
#15
Charlie Crist		  
#16
Mike Pence		  
#17
Other		  
#18
I'll vote for the Republican no matter who it is		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 42

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Republicans, here's a question  (Read 6088 times)
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« on: August 21, 2009, 06:14:19 PM »
Quote from: Re-elect Obama on August 21, 2009, 05:57:22 PM
Look at the question. Smiley (You can pick up to three)

Why three?
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2009, 06:23:21 PM »

All would be more reasonable.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2009, 08:53:08 PM »
Quote from: azmagic on August 21, 2009, 08:23:29 PM
Crist and Pawlenty are rabid liberals who would show their true colors given electoral power.  Republicans in congress will vote for their programs and it will be Bush all over again.

Do you read what you type?
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 21, 2009, 09:49:42 PM »
Quote from: Chairman RowanBrandon on August 21, 2009, 09:42:18 PM
Quote from: fezzyfestoon on August 21, 2009, 09:39:38 PM
Quote from: Chairman RowanBrandon on August 21, 2009, 09:33:28 PM
And we all know 95% of the Republicans here would end up pulling the lever for the Republican once they got into the voting booth anyway, so this thread is pointless.

So then the 5% of us who aren't blind partisans will post.

So you'd vote for the guy that you disagree with about everything, all because your candidate didn't win the primary. Talk about being a sore loser.

Who said he disagrees with Obama about everything?
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« Reply #4 on: August 22, 2009, 11:51:06 AM »
Quote from: Chairman RowanBrandon on August 21, 2009, 09:52:40 PM
Quote from: Wyatt Chеsney on August 21, 2009, 09:49:42 PM
Quote from: Chairman RowanBrandon on August 21, 2009, 09:42:18 PM
Quote from: fezzyfestoon on August 21, 2009, 09:39:38 PM
Quote from: Chairman RowanBrandon on August 21, 2009, 09:33:28 PM
And we all know 95% of the Republicans here would end up pulling the lever for the Republican once they got into the voting booth anyway, so this thread is pointless.

So then the 5% of us who aren't blind partisans will post.

So you'd vote for the guy that you disagree with about everything, all because your candidate didn't win the primary. Talk about being a sore loser.

Who said he disagrees with Obama about everything?

He's a Republican, so naturally he would agree with the Republican candidate more than the far-left radical borderline Marxist/Socialist/Racist in the White House.

It's clear you don't understand Marxism or socialism, and that's fine (though I can call you an idiot for it), but racist?
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« Reply #5 on: August 22, 2009, 11:56:05 AM »
Quote from: Chairman RowanBrandon on August 22, 2009, 11:53:58 AM
Quote from: Wyatt Chеsney on August 22, 2009, 11:51:06 AM
Quote from: Chairman RowanBrandon on August 21, 2009, 09:52:40 PM
Quote from: Wyatt Chеsney on August 21, 2009, 09:49:42 PM
Quote from: Chairman RowanBrandon on August 21, 2009, 09:42:18 PM
Quote from: fezzyfestoon on August 21, 2009, 09:39:38 PM
Quote from: Chairman RowanBrandon on August 21, 2009, 09:33:28 PM
And we all know 95% of the Republicans here would end up pulling the lever for the Republican once they got into the voting booth anyway, so this thread is pointless.

So then the 5% of us who aren't blind partisans will post.

So you'd vote for the guy that you disagree with about everything, all because your candidate didn't win the primary. Talk about being a sore loser.

Who said he disagrees with Obama about everything?

He's a Republican, so naturally he would agree with the Republican candidate more than the far-left radical borderline Marxist/Socialist/Racist in the White House.

It's clear you don't understand Marxism or socialism, and that's fine (though I can call you an idiot for it), but racist?

It was hyperbole.

Not at all clever.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« Reply #6 on: August 22, 2009, 06:02:34 PM »
Quote from: Midwest Lt. Governor Vepres on August 22, 2009, 03:02:28 PM
I don't see how economic conservative couldn't like Gingrich. He has lots of new ideas despite being a 90s politician and he is actually an intellectual, rare in modern politics.

I wouldn't consider him that.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« Reply #7 on: August 26, 2009, 09:50:38 PM »
Quote from: Giovanni on August 26, 2009, 07:50:52 PM
What is everybody's beef with Gary Johnson?

He's weird.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW
« Reply #8 on: September 02, 2009, 07:05:41 PM »
Quote from: rebel_libertarian on September 01, 2009, 11:12:20 PM

Being "pro-drugs" is actually a conservative position.  The War on Drugs and other sorts of prohibition have a long track record of failure and wasted money.  Conservatism is supposed to be logical, anti-corruption and economically efficient.

That doesn't make any sense. Whenever something is stupid, opposing it is conservative?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 15 queries.