Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 23, 2013, 11:35:26 am
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
Election Archive
2010 Elections
(Moderator:
Joe Republic
)
Targeted Democratic seats
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: Targeted Democratic seats (Read 2617 times)
biggzcorey
Full Member
Posts: 139
Targeted Democratic seats
«
on:
August 26, 2009, 04:58:25 am »
Below is a list of Democratic congressmen that will be targeted by the NRCC
VA-05 Tom Perriello (D) R+5 <1%
ID-01 Walt Minnick (D) R+18 1%
MD-01 Frank Kratovil (D) R+13 1%
OH-15 Mary-Jo Kilroy (D) D+1 1%
PA-03 Kathleen Dahlkemper (D) R+3 2%
MI-07 Mark Schauer (D) R+2 2%
NY-29 Eric Massa (D) R+5 2%
PA-11 Paul Kanjorski (D) D+4 3%
CT-04 Jim Himes (D) D+5 4%
FL-08 Alan Grayson (D) R+2 4%
NJ-03 John Adler (D) R+1 4%
NY-24 Mike Arcuri (D) R+2 4%
AL-05 Parker Griffith (D) R+12 4%
NV-03 Dina Titus (D) D+2 5%
VA-02 Glenn Nye (D) R+5 5%
OH-01 Steve Driehaus (D) D+1 5%
NH-01 Carol Shea-Porter (D) R+0 6%
TX-17 Chet Edwards (D) R+20 7%
WI-08 Steve Kagen (D) R+2 8%
AZ-05 Harry Mitchell (D) R+5 9%
MI-09 Gary Peters (D) D+2 9%
NC-08 Larry Kissell (D) R+2 10%
OH-16 John Boccieri (D) R+4 10%
CA-11 Jerry McNerney (D) R+1 10%
FL-22 Ron Klein (D) D+1 10%
MS-01 Travis Childers (D) R+14 10%
PA-04 Jason Altmire (D) R+6 12%
PA-10 Chris Carney (D) R+8 12%
CO-04 Betsy Markey (D) R+6 12%
NM-01 Martin Heinrich (D) D+5 12%
NM-02 Harry Teague (D) R+6 12%
VA-11 Gerald Connolly (D) D+2 12%
NY-25 Dan Maffei (D) D+3 13%
IA-03 Leonard Boswell (D) D+1 14%
NH-02 (Open) (D) D+3 15%
IL-14 Bill Foster (D) R+1 15%
KS-03 Dennis Moore (D) R+3 16%
NY-01 Tim Bishop (D) R+0 16%
OR-05 Kurt Schrader (D) D+1 16%
PA-12 John Murtha (D) R+1 16%
FL-24 Suzanne Kosmas (D) R+4 16%
AZ-01 Ann Kirkpatrick (D) R+6 17%
NY-19 John Hall (D) R+3 18%
IN-09 Baron Hill (D) R+6 20%
OH-18 Zack Space (D) R+7 20%
PA-07 (Open) (D) D+3 20%
WI-07 Dave Obey (D) D+3 22%
ND-AL Earl Pomeroy (D) R+10 24%
NY-20 Scott Murphy (D) R+2 24%
IL-11 Debbie Halvorson (D) R+1 24%
NY-13 Mike McMahon (D) R+4 28%
UT-02 Jim Matheson (D) R+15 28%
WI-03 Ron Kind (D) D+4 29%
IN-08 Brad Ellsworth (D) R+8 30%
KY-06 Ben Chandler (D) R+9 30%
MO-04 Ike Skelton (D) R+14 32%
GA-12 John Barrow (D) D+1 32%
SD-AL Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin (D) R+9 35%
OK-02 Dan Boren (D) R+14 41%
CA-47 Loretta Sanchez (D) D+4 44%
AR-02 Vic Snyder (D) R+5 53%
OR-01 David Wu (D) D+8 54%
HI-01 (Open) (D) D+11 58%
OR-04 Peter DeFazio (D) D+2 69%
AR-04 Mike Ross (D) R+7 72%
AR-01 Marion Berry (D) R+8 100%
VA-09 Rick Boucher (D) R+11 100%
WV-01 Alan Mollohan (D) R+9 100%
LA-03 Charlie Melancon (D) R+12 100%
Many democrats do have to worry about being re-elected (Minnick, Bright, Katovil), but some of these are just not going to happen (HI-01,OR-01,WI-07)
Logged
Economic score: -2.71
Social score: -6.61
Gravis Marketing
brittain33
YaBB God
Posts: 11983
Re: Targeted Democratic seats
«
Reply #1 on:
August 26, 2009, 11:20:21 am »
They will not have enough money to "target" that many seats effectively.
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
YaBB God
Posts: 16900
Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78
Re: Targeted Democratic seats
«
Reply #2 on:
August 26, 2009, 11:30:43 am »
This is the AP list, right? There's a thread on it elsewhere. Suffice to say, either the AP or the NRCC is completely bullsh**tting. David Wu? Ron Kind? Loretta Sanchez? David Obey? LOL.
Logged
nhmagic
azmagic
YaBB God
Posts: 1106
Political Matrix
E: 4.62, S: 4.61
Re: Targeted Democratic seats
«
Reply #3 on:
August 26, 2009, 11:34:22 am »
There's one glaring omission to that list and thats Gabi "Pelosi's Lapdog" Giffords.
Logged
Badger
badger
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 8532
Re: Targeted Democratic seats
«
Reply #4 on:
August 26, 2009, 05:15:55 pm »
Quote from: azmagic on August 26, 2009, 11:34:22 am
There's one glaring omission to that list and thats Gabi "Pelosi's Lapdog" Giffords.
Yes, after all this was such a narrowly drawn list. I'm sure Giffords' omission from a list that includes such prime targets as HI-1, CA-47, GA-12 and OR-1 was a simple oversight. The NCCC is surely licking their chops at the the prospect of Giffords going down.
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
YaBB God
Posts: 6854
Re: Targeted Democratic seats
«
Reply #5 on:
August 26, 2009, 05:41:09 pm »
Quote from: azmagic on August 26, 2009, 11:34:22 am
There's one glaring omission to that list and thats Gabi "Pelosi's Lapdog" Giffords.
Keep the dream alive!
Logged
ajc0918
YaBB God
Posts: 1322
Re: Targeted Democratic seats
«
Reply #6 on:
August 26, 2009, 05:49:01 pm »
Quote from: Verily on August 26, 2009, 11:30:43 am
This is the AP list, right? There's a thread on it elsewhere. Suffice to say, either the AP or the NRCC is completely bullsh**tting. David Wu? Ron Kind? Loretta Sanchez? David Obey? LOL.
Loretta Sanchez has a formidable opponent. He outraised her by 3k, she definitely isn't safe.
But it is lean democrat.
Here's the opponent.
www.joinvantran.com
Logged
Gravis Marketing
brittain33
YaBB God
Posts: 11983
Re: Targeted Democratic seats
«
Reply #7 on:
August 26, 2009, 05:55:02 pm »
Jim McDermott, Frank Pallone, Gerry Connolly
Logged
Jayhawker
tmthforu94
YaBB God
Posts: 15933
Re: Targeted Democratic seats
«
Reply #8 on:
August 26, 2009, 06:00:38 pm »
Wow, that's a lot of people. I wish they focused on less seats, so they could spend more there.
I'm suprised they are targetting Brad Ellsworth. His only opponent thus far is a no name candidate. Possibly Bob Heaton could make the rate interesting, but even then, I'm suprised it would make the list.
Logged
A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives.
-Jackie Robinson
Quote from: John_Engle on November 02, 2012, 04:25:37 pm
Tmthforu94
You are very kind my Friend. Thank you and God bless the people like You.
biggzcorey
Full Member
Posts: 139
Re: Targeted Democratic seats
«
Reply #9 on:
August 26, 2009, 06:31:39 pm »
Quote from: Verily on August 26, 2009, 11:30:43 am
This is the AP list, right? There's a thread on it elsewhere. Suffice to say, either the AP or the NRCC is completely bullsh**tting. David Wu? Ron Kind? Loretta Sanchez? David Obey? LOL.
http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2009/Senate/Maps/Aug05-s.html
this is an interesting article on it
Logged
Economic score: -2.71
Social score: -6.61
JohnnyLongtorso
YaBB God
Posts: 6854
Re: Targeted Democratic seats
«
Reply #10 on:
August 26, 2009, 06:42:27 pm »
The Republicans should probably put all their chips on targeting every Southern Democrat not in a majority-minority district. The South seems to be the most fertile ground for making gains in the House, seeing as how it's the epicenter of the tea parties and birthers.
Logged
Gravis Marketing
brittain33
YaBB God
Posts: 11983
Re: Targeted Democratic seats
«
Reply #11 on:
August 27, 2009, 08:44:50 am »
Quote from: biggzcorey on August 26, 2009, 06:31:39 pm
Quote from: Verily on August 26, 2009, 11:30:43 am
This is the AP list, right? There's a thread on it elsewhere. Suffice to say, either the AP or the NRCC is completely bullsh**tting. David Wu? Ron Kind? Loretta Sanchez? David Obey? LOL.
http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2009/Senate/Maps/Aug05-s.html
this is an interesting article on it
Murkowski and Thune are "barely GOP" while Dodd is safe... no thanks.
Logged
Former Moderate
Mr. Moderate
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 12181
Re: Targeted Democratic seats
«
Reply #12 on:
August 27, 2009, 08:51:21 am »
Quote from: brittain33 on August 27, 2009, 08:44:50 am
Murkowski and Thune are "barely GOP" while Dodd is safe... no thanks.
Lawl. Why even have that map if you're just going to show 2004 election results with it?
Logged
Quote from: © Tweedism is for poseurs in junior high on January 31, 2013, 04:28:53 pm
Mr Moderate at 54/10 is a total joke, he is a horror.
Gravis Marketing
brittain33
YaBB God
Posts: 11983
Re: Targeted Democratic seats
«
Reply #13 on:
August 27, 2009, 10:23:37 am »
Quote from: Mr. Moderate on August 27, 2009, 08:51:21 am
Quote from: brittain33 on August 27, 2009, 08:44:50 am
Murkowski and Thune are "barely GOP" while Dodd is safe... no thanks.
Lawl. Why even have that map if you're just going to show 2004 election results with it?
Thanks for explaining their methodology. This looked full-on Dick Morris-type crazy without that.
Logged
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
Posts: 56538
Re: Targeted Democratic seats
«
Reply #14 on:
August 27, 2009, 10:47:20 am »
Quote from: brittain33 on August 27, 2009, 10:23:37 am
Quote from: Mr. Moderate on August 27, 2009, 08:51:21 am
Quote from: brittain33 on August 27, 2009, 08:44:50 am
Murkowski and Thune are "barely GOP" while Dodd is safe... no thanks.
Lawl. Why even have that map if you're just going to show 2004 election results with it?
Thanks for explaining their methodology. This looked full-on Dick Morris-type crazy without that.
"1. The most recent poll in every state is always used.
2. If no other polls were taken within a week of the most recent one, only the most recent poll counts.
3. If one or more polls were taken within a week of the most recent, all of them are averaged, weighted equally."
I suppose most races haven't been polled yet so (just as on this site's poll aggregator, btw) the previous result is used as the base.
Logged
Quote from: True Federalist on April 28, 2013, 01:25:07 am
Liberate yourself from Free Will
Kitty's beardgrowing advice to Mitty.
Former Moderate
Mr. Moderate
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 12181
Re: Targeted Democratic seats
«
Reply #15 on:
August 27, 2009, 10:56:37 am »
Quote from: Matko Destanov on August 27, 2009, 10:47:20 am
Quote from: brittain33 on August 27, 2009, 10:23:37 am
Quote from: Mr. Moderate on August 27, 2009, 08:51:21 am
Quote from: brittain33 on August 27, 2009, 08:44:50 am
Murkowski and Thune are "barely GOP" while Dodd is safe... no thanks.
Lawl. Why even have that map if you're just going to show 2004 election results with it?
Thanks for explaining their methodology. This looked full-on Dick Morris-type crazy without that.
"1. The most recent poll in every state is always used.
2. If no other polls were taken within a week of the most recent one, only the most recent poll counts.
3. If one or more polls were taken within a week of the most recent, all of them are averaged, weighted equally."
I suppose most races haven't been polled yet so (just as on this site's poll aggregator, btw) the previous result is used as the base.
Polls HAVE been taken on races in Connecticut and New Hampshire, for instance, two states incorrectly showing huge leads for the incumbent parties based on '04 results. I just think it's a problem with them not focusing enough on those races or that site enough to put them in. August 2009 is a long way off from November 2010—most people haven't seriously put much thought into these races.
Logged
Quote from: © Tweedism is for poseurs in junior high on January 31, 2013, 04:28:53 pm
Mr Moderate at 54/10 is a total joke, he is a horror.
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
Posts: 56538
Re: Targeted Democratic seats
«
Reply #16 on:
August 27, 2009, 11:01:03 am »
That brings me to the other option... they're posting articles but haven't started updating the map yet.
In which case the question, "why post the map at all?", is of course a pertinent one.
Logged
Quote from: True Federalist on April 28, 2013, 01:25:07 am
Liberate yourself from Free Will
Kitty's beardgrowing advice to Mitty.
biggzcorey
Full Member
Posts: 139
Re: Targeted Democratic seats
«
Reply #17 on:
August 27, 2009, 08:36:52 pm »
They haven't updated the map yet, probably because it's too early to really tell. Showing the 2004 results is just a base.
Logged
Economic score: -2.71
Social score: -6.61
You kip if you want to...
change08
YaBB God
Posts: 8052
Re: Targeted Democratic seats
«
Reply #18 on:
August 27, 2009, 09:17:02 pm »
Quote from: biggzcorey on August 27, 2009, 08:36:52 pm
They haven't updated the map yet, probably because it's too early to really tell. Showing the 2004 results is just a base.
They normally update it when it gets to the point when there's almost daily polls for the battlegrounds.
Logged
Senator Sbane
sbane
YaBB God
Posts: 12179
Re: Targeted Democratic seats
«
Reply #19 on:
August 31, 2009, 01:00:37 pm »
Quote from: ajc0918 on August 26, 2009, 05:49:01 pm
Quote from: Verily on August 26, 2009, 11:30:43 am
This is the AP list, right? There's a thread on it elsewhere. Suffice to say, either the AP or the NRCC is completely bullsh**tting. David Wu? Ron Kind? Loretta Sanchez? David Obey? LOL.
Loretta Sanchez has a formidable opponent. He outraised her by 3k, she definitely isn't safe.
But it is lean democrat.
Here's the opponent.
www.joinvantran.com
I will admit that Tran will do well in Garden Grove. But he is going to be absolutely destroyed everywhere else.
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...