What if Benedict Arnold Did Not Abandon the Revolution?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 01:00:11 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History
  Alternative History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  What if Benedict Arnold Did Not Abandon the Revolution?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What if Benedict Arnold Did Not Abandon the Revolution?  (Read 4063 times)
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,568
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 06, 2009, 05:38:27 PM »

Let's suppose that Benedict Arnold had received his just recognition in helping to win the Battle of Saratoga, and that he had not turned against the American cause while he was in charge at West Point -how differently would events had transpired had we still had him on our side?
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2009, 07:00:27 PM »

Let's suppose that Benedict Arnold had received his just recognition in helping to win the Battle of Saratoga, and that he had not turned against the American cause while he was in charge at West Point -how differently would events had transpired had we still had him on our side?

I predict he would've ended up dying a Nathan Hale death and he would've been known as a Great American Hero. We would've gained momentum due to his execution at the hands of the British and maybe have accelerated the end of hostilities. However, due to the nature of politics the war might still technically end as late as it did IOTL.

This is of course wild speculation.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2009, 07:50:28 PM »

Maybe some guys here would have AMERICAN HERO ARNOLD in their signatures
Logged
CatoMinor
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,007
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2009, 11:48:10 PM »

He would probably be rememberd as the second best general of the Revolution.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2009, 01:05:21 PM »

Almost certainly it would have been Arnold and not Gates who would have been sent south after the fall of Charleston.  Arnold surely would not have been as rash as Gates, so likely would not have advanced south from Charlotte to Camden (assuming Arnold also picks Camden as a place to advance to) until he had both had time to get a better sense of the troops under his command and cooler weather than August in South Carolina to march his troops.  So the Battle of Camden would have take place about a month later, with the Continentals both better prepared and not as fatigued by the climate. (Getting the militia some bayonets so that they don't cut and run would also be a great help.)

Camden will prove a tactical victory for the Continentals, but between the area being a bastion of Loyalist support, and the likelihood of further British reinforcements for a second attack, Arnold would either have to fall back on Charlotte or press forward towards Kingstree in Williamsburg Township where he could expect greater support from the people.

Ironically, the lack of a Continental collapse while beneficial in the short run is ultimately harmful to the Continental cause.  It was British overconfidence after OTL Battle of Camden that led to their taking actions that ultimately led to popular support for the Rebel cause in the Upcountry.  Absent that support, the Continentals will have a hard time keeping armies in Upcountry South Carolina supplied.

When it comes time for the Battle of Yorktown, since Cornwallis will likely have stayed in the Carolinas, the British force captured there would be smaller, but would likely be sufficient to cause the British to enter into peace negotiations since any significant defeat would have prompted the Whigs to do so.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 20, 2009, 03:26:24 PM »

He would be considered an American hero instead of a traitor.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 25, 2009, 02:28:44 AM »

He would have been President Arnold.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,986
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 25, 2009, 09:01:26 PM »

He would have been President Arnold.

When? Would he have succeeded Washington?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 12 queries.