Do you agree with Modern Portfolio Theory?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 06:49:15 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Economics (Moderator: Torie)
  Do you agree with Modern Portfolio Theory?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you agree with Modern Portfolio Theory?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 3

Author Topic: Do you agree with Modern Portfolio Theory?  (Read 1720 times)
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 10, 2009, 03:25:36 AM »
« edited: September 10, 2009, 03:27:53 AM by phknrocket1k »

Do you agree with Modern Portfolio Theory?



Modern portfolio theory (MPT) proposes how rational investors will use diversification to optimize their portfolios, and how a risky asset should be priced.

The basic concepts of the theory are:

*Markowitz diversification
*Risk/Return tradeoff
*The efficient frontier
*Capital asset pricing model
*The Alpha and Beta(β) coefficients

Alpha is a risk-adjusted measure of the so-called active return on an investment. It is the return in excess of the compensation for the risk borne, and thus commonly used to assess active managers' performances.

    * αi < rf: the investment has earned too little for its risk (or, was too risky for the return)
    * αi = rf: the investment has earned a return adequate for the risk taken
    * αi > rf: the investment has a return in excess of the reward for the assumed risk

In finance, the beta (β) of a stock or portfolio is a number describing the relation of its returns with that of the financial market as a whole.

*the Capital Market Line
*Securities Market Line.

MPT models an asset's return as a random variable, and models a portfolio as a weighted combination of assets so that the return of a portfolio is the weighted combination of the assets' returns. Moreover, a portfolio's return is a random variable, and consequently has an expected value and a variance. Risk, in this model, is the standard deviation of return.
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 10, 2009, 03:32:55 PM »

I'm going to say yes.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2009, 02:24:30 AM »
« Edited: September 15, 2009, 02:29:52 AM by phknrocket1k »

I suppose its a fairly good theoretical model (it's greatest breakthrough was quantifying risk as the standard deviation of asset returns through various portfolios on a risk-return frontier) and for which Harry Markowitz won the Nobel Prize. 
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 16, 2009, 07:01:49 PM »
« Edited: September 16, 2009, 07:03:46 PM by phknrocket1k »

Chance a U.S. household that owns a Prius also owns an SUV: 1 in 3.
That is from Harper's Index, October issue.

This is cool. Portfolio theory extrapolated into horsepower and miles per gallon (as a tradeoff and graphed in the appropriate frontier).

Maybe the RF could be seen as the minimum miles per gallon with indifference curves representing optimal "portfolios" of cars.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.