Which flavor of military is it better for a nation to have? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 02:03:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Which flavor of military is it better for a nation to have? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which flavor of military is it better for a nation to have?
#1
conscript
 
#2
professional
 
#3
mix
 
#4
other ('splain)
 
#5
none
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 39

Author Topic: Which flavor of military is it better for a nation to have?  (Read 4523 times)
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,582
United States


WWW
« on: September 12, 2009, 06:03:55 PM »

Normally I would say a volunteer professional military, but it would be wise to keep the option of conscription alive just in case we face a foe that is roughly our military equal (like the Soviet Union during the Cold War, or Nazi Germany and militarist Japan in the Second World War) as unlikely as that prospect is at present.  At present, all we need is an expanded professional military (especially the Special Forces) -I don't see what good conscription will do us in counter-insurgency or counter-terrorism. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.