Which flavor of military is it better for a nation to have? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 12:40:58 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Which flavor of military is it better for a nation to have? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which flavor of military is it better for a nation to have?
#1
conscript		  
#2
professional		  
#3
mix		  
#4
other ('splain)		  
#5
none		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 39

Author Topic: Which flavor of military is it better for a nation to have?  (Read 4518 times)
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,175
United States


« on: September 12, 2009, 03:05:38 AM »
     Option five.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,175
United States


« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2009, 02:42:04 AM »
Quote from: NiK on September 24, 2009, 08:20:33 PM

Please elaborate Freethinker, as I see no way how a privatised military will not bring chaos, confusion, greed, and lack of patriotism.

     I think he just means mercenary forces communities can hire for their protection. While not illogical in the libertarian paradigm, I think a citizen's militia would be a much better solution, since armies-for-hire would make large scale belligerence far too easy for anybody with deep pockets.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 14 queries.