The 'Socialism' attack on President Obama
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 08:48:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  The 'Socialism' attack on President Obama
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: The 'Socialism' attack on President Obama  (Read 4097 times)
ChaosInTheSky
Newbie
*
Posts: 14
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 23, 2009, 05:38:57 PM »

Lately, many have accused the President Obama of embracing Socialism . As someone who was once a member of the Communist Party, I have researched Socialism/Communism for years. I think this quote best sums up my feelings about it now:

"How do you tell a Communist? It's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. How do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who UNDERSTANDS Marx and Lenin." -Ronald Reagan.

Having said that, after I did my research, I understood how unfair, and how damaging the idea of Socialism/Communism is. I now consider myself a proud Libertarian, and am a huge opponent of gigantic government.

My question is: if Obama is 'the farthest thing from a Socialist' as some of his supporters claim, how do you explain this?
http://www.cpusa.org/article/articleview/1054/1/157/

As a former member of this party, I can attest that most of it's members were ECSTATIC when Obama won the Presidency, and some called him "The best chance our party has".


If Obama does not hold Socialist ideals, why did he say this?

"One of the, I think, the tragedies of the civil rights movement, was because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change, and in some ways we still suffer from that." -Barack Obama


Basically what I'm asking is, to those of you on the left: do you really think that Socialist ideals are a good thing for America?
Logged
Ban my account ffs!
snowguy716
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,632
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 23, 2009, 05:42:19 PM »

Lately, many have accused the President Obama of embracing Socialism . As someone who was once a member of the Communist Party, I have researched Socialism/Communism for years. I think this quote best sums up my feelings about it now:

"How do you tell a Communist? It's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. How do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who UNDERSTANDS Marx and Lenin." -Ronald Reagan.

Having said that, after I did my research, I understood how unfair, and how damaging the idea of Socialism/Communism is. I now consider myself a proud Libertarian, and am a huge opponent of gigantic government.

My question is: if Obama is 'the farthest thing from a Socialist' as some of his supporters claim, how do you explain this?
http://www.cpusa.org/article/articleview/1054/1/157/

As a former member of this party, I can attest that most of it's members were ECSTATIC when Obama won the Presidency, and some called him "The best chance our party has".


If Obama does not hold Socialist ideals, why did he say this?

"One of the, I think, the tragedies of the civil rights movement, was because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change, and in some ways we still suffer from that." -Barack Obama


Basically what I'm asking is, to those of you on the left: do you really think that Socialist ideals are a good thing for America?

As opposed to authoritarian and overtly religious corporatist ideals?

Hell yes.. I prefer socialism over that any day.
Logged
ChaosInTheSky
Newbie
*
Posts: 14
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 23, 2009, 05:45:39 PM »

Lately, many have accused the President Obama of embracing Socialism . As someone who was once a member of the Communist Party, I have researched Socialism/Communism for years. I think this quote best sums up my feelings about it now:

"How do you tell a Communist? It's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. How do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who UNDERSTANDS Marx and Lenin." -Ronald Reagan.

Having said that, after I did my research, I understood how unfair, and how damaging the idea of Socialism/Communism is. I now consider myself a proud Libertarian, and am a huge opponent of gigantic government.

My question is: if Obama is 'the farthest thing from a Socialist' as some of his supporters claim, how do you explain this?
http://www.cpusa.org/article/articleview/1054/1/157/

As a former member of this party, I can attest that most of it's members were ECSTATIC when Obama won the Presidency, and some called him "The best chance our party has".


If Obama does not hold Socialist ideals, why did he say this?

"One of the, I think, the tragedies of the civil rights movement, was because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change, and in some ways we still suffer from that." -Barack Obama


Basically what I'm asking is, to those of you on the left: do you really think that Socialist ideals are a good thing for America?

As opposed to authoritarian and overtly religious corporatist ideals?

Hell yes.. I prefer socialism over that any day.

Could you please explain yourself a little better and maybe provide a source?
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 23, 2009, 05:56:22 PM »

Lately, many have accused the President Obama of embracing Socialism . As someone who was once a member of the Communist Party, I have researched Socialism/Communism for years. I think this quote best sums up my feelings about it now:

"How do you tell a Communist? It's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. How do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who UNDERSTANDS Marx and Lenin." -Ronald Reagan.

Having said that, after I did my research, I understood how unfair, and how damaging the idea of Socialism/Communism is. I now consider myself a proud Libertarian, and am a huge opponent of gigantic government.

My question is: if Obama is 'the farthest thing from a Socialist' as some of his supporters claim, how do you explain this?
http://www.cpusa.org/article/articleview/1054/1/157/

As a former member of this party, I can attest that most of it's members were ECSTATIC when Obama won the Presidency, and some called him "The best chance our party has".


If Obama does not hold Socialist ideals, why did he say this?

"One of the, I think, the tragedies of the civil rights movement, was because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change, and in some ways we still suffer from that." -Barack Obama


Basically what I'm asking is, to those of you on the left: do you really think that Socialist ideals are a good thing for America?

Well obviously Obama is closer to being a communist than McCain. The Communist Party approving of his election doesn't mean anything.

I bet you anything the Nazi Party (or whatever they call themselves) prefered McCain to Obama....does that make McCain a Nazi?

Logged
ChaosInTheSky
Newbie
*
Posts: 14
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 23, 2009, 06:02:19 PM »
« Edited: September 23, 2009, 06:07:33 PM by ChaosInTheSky »


Very good point, their support of him means not much. But did you actually read the article? They support him because of his Socialist ideals.

And by the way, the Nazis were far more liberal than conservative. Hence the term: National SOCIALIST Party.

For more on this: I suggest you check out Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg. Before those accuse him of being a Republican propaganda lunatic, he lists all his sources in the end of his book. None of it is false.




Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 23, 2009, 06:10:53 PM »

Nazism has absolutely nothing to do with modern liberalism, nothing at all.
Logged
ChaosInTheSky
Newbie
*
Posts: 14
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 23, 2009, 06:16:28 PM »

Nazism has absolutely nothing to do with modern liberalism, nothing at all.


Well duh, modern liberalism doesn't support the mass murder of ethnic groups. Or war mongering. Or even nationalism. Of course it doesn't support that.

But the Nazis weren't all about that. Go research some of their policies and then come back to me and tell me the same thing. Nazism is rooted in Liberalism. Again, National SOCIALIST party. Socialism is LEFT of the political spectrum. The Nazis took over every private industry in Germany. Does that sound like anything Conservative to you? It sounds like Socialism to me.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 23, 2009, 06:18:12 PM »

Nazism has absolutely nothing to do with modern liberalism, nothing at all.


Well duh, modern liberalism doesn't support the mass murder of ethnic groups. Or war mongering. Or even nationalism. Of course it doesn't support that.

But the Nazis weren't all about that. Go research some of their policies and then come back to me and tell me the same thing. Nazism is rooted in Liberalism. Again, National SOCIALIST party. Socialism is LEFT of the political spectrum.

Does that mean the Democratic Republic of North Korea is a democracy?
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 23, 2009, 06:19:20 PM »

First of all, learn a differences between communism and socialism, man
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 23, 2009, 06:20:11 PM »

First of all, learn a differences between communism and socialism, man

I don't see much difference, but it doesn't have anything to do with Nazism Wink
Logged
ChaosInTheSky
Newbie
*
Posts: 14
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 23, 2009, 06:21:35 PM »

First of all, learn a differences between communism and socialism, man

Well gee, since you're so informed, why don't you explain them to us?

Marx stated that Socialism is a stepping stone to Communism. This in in the Communist Manifesto.
Logged
ChaosInTheSky
Newbie
*
Posts: 14
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 23, 2009, 06:23:01 PM »

First of all, learn a differences between communism and socialism, man

I don't see much difference, but it doesn't have anything to do with Nazism Wink

Again, the Nazis took over all the industry in the private sector. THAT WOULD BE SOCIALISM, would it not?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,713
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 23, 2009, 06:25:23 PM »

Hence the term: National SOCIALIST Party.

No. No. No. Not this again.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

No. No. No. Not this again.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

lol

Even first year undergraduates do that.
Logged
ChaosInTheSky
Newbie
*
Posts: 14
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 23, 2009, 06:26:44 PM »

Hence the term: National SOCIALIST Party.

No. No. No. Not this again.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

No. No. No. Not this again.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

lol

Even first year undergraduates do that.

And if you check the source, it's credible.
Why don't you explain yourself a bit more instead of just disageeing?
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 23, 2009, 06:27:59 PM »

First of all, learn a differences between communism and socialism, man

I don't see much difference, but it doesn't have anything to do with Nazism Wink

Again, the Nazis took over all the industry in the private sector. THAT WOULD BE SOCIALISM, would it not?

Sharing certain traits doesn't make ideologies have anything to do with each other. The intention was obviously very different, and it seems obvious that Nazis never intended for their state controlled businesses to "serve the people" (or insert random socialist phrase).

Again, are tough-on-terrorist conservative Republicans fascists for adovacting indefinite detention at Guantanamo? Your answer might be yes, but I would also disagree with that. Merely sharing a certain point of view doesn't indicate actual similarity.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,713
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 23, 2009, 06:29:04 PM »

Again, the Nazis took over all the industry in the private sector.


Don't think that IG Farben was ever nationalised.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Well, no actually (was de Gaulle a Socialist?) but that's for another day.
Logged
ChaosInTheSky
Newbie
*
Posts: 14
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 23, 2009, 06:29:30 PM »

Nazism has absolutely nothing to do with modern liberalism, nothing at all.


Well duh, modern liberalism doesn't support the mass murder of ethnic groups. Or war mongering. Or even nationalism. Of course it doesn't support that.

But the Nazis weren't all about that. Go research some of their policies and then come back to me and tell me the same thing. Nazism is rooted in Liberalism. Again, National SOCIALIST party. Socialism is LEFT of the political spectrum.

Does that mean the Democratic Republic of North Korea is a democracy?

Kudos on that, very good point.
Logged
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 23, 2009, 06:29:38 PM »

Obama's a liberal with socialist tendencies, but he is far from the stereotypical western European socialist. Sure, he's a socialist relative to our country's political center, but that isn't really that scary, unlike real socialism.
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 23, 2009, 06:30:17 PM »

Basically what I'm asking is, to those of you on the left: do you really think that Socialist ideals are a good thing for America?

Yes.

But Obama's certainly no Socialist.
Logged
ChaosInTheSky
Newbie
*
Posts: 14
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: September 23, 2009, 06:31:12 PM »

Again, the Nazis took over all the industry in the private sector.


Don't think that IG Farben was ever nationalised.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Well, no actually (was de Gaulle a Socialist?) but that's for another day.

Dude, your answers aren't providing to any side of this. Could you maybe say a little more than two lines worth? And then maybe give us some proof as to what you are saying?
Logged
ChaosInTheSky
Newbie
*
Posts: 14
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: September 23, 2009, 06:32:25 PM »

Basically what I'm asking is, to those of you on the left: do you really think that Socialist ideals are a good thing for America?

Yes.

But Obama's certainly no Socialist.


How on earth do you think Socialism is good for a nation that was founded on Capitalist belifes? Please explain.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,713
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: September 23, 2009, 06:33:32 PM »

And if you check the source, it's credible.

Umm... yes, I would certainly hope so. This is also true of the work of (most) first year undergraduates. I do hope that he didn't just cite secondary material.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Because the Nazis = Socialist canard isn't worth wasting much time dismissing. No one (no one honest anyway) with a basic knowledge of early 20th century German history takes it seriously.
Logged
Franzl
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,254
Germany


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: September 23, 2009, 06:35:06 PM »

Basically what I'm asking is, to those of you on the left: do you really think that Socialist ideals are a good thing for America?

Yes.

But Obama's certainly no Socialist.


How on earth do you think Socialism is good for a nation that was founded on Capitalist belifes? Please explain.

I'm by no means a socialist, but what do the beliefs upon which the nation was founded have to do with what's "good for the nation"?
Logged
Marokai Backbeat
Marokai Blue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,477
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -7.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: September 23, 2009, 06:36:02 PM »

Basically what I'm asking is, to those of you on the left: do you really think that Socialist ideals are a good thing for America?

Yes.

But Obama's certainly no Socialist.


How on earth do you think Socialism is good for a nation that was founded on Capitalist belifes? Please explain.

Because I happen to like a basic social safety net, the post office, the fire department, financial assistance to the elderly and disabled, a highway system, Medicare & Medicaid, public education.. among other things.

I'm by no means a socialist, but what do the beliefs upon which the nation was founded have to do with what's "good for the nation"?

Yeah, that too. Tongue
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,713
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: September 23, 2009, 06:36:19 PM »

Dude, your answers aren't providing to any side of this. Could you maybe say a little more than two lines worth? And then maybe give us some proof as to what you are saying?

I like to assume a certain (pretty basic, actually) level of knowledge from other people. I assume that anyone writing about the Nazis knows what IG Farben was, for example. I also assume that anyone who posts on a political board knows who de Gaulle was.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 12 queries.