Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 25, 2014, 06:19:05 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2010 Elections (Moderator: Joe Republic)
| | |-+  Who Is the Most Economically Liberal Republican Politician In Office Right Now?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Author Topic: Who Is the Most Economically Liberal Republican Politician In Office Right Now?  (Read 10970 times)
IDS Attorney General PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22419
United States


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: January 06, 2010, 04:45:29 am »
Ignore

Actually, I'm pretty sure Philip qualifies as the most far-right libertarian on the forum, and he's so far right that I'd never live in any country he governed. Mech and I probably tie for most left-leaning.

     In my experience, Philip tends to be more balanced in the positions he endorses while Bono mostly fights his battles over economic issues (he once professed to not caring about same-sex marriage).

He does, however, have a lot of that HURR CHRISTIANITY HURR attitude that's common among those on the paleocon spectrum.

     I don't know if I've ever seen Philip post anything on the topic of religion, but Bono is someone who seriously takes part in theological discussions. I don't recall what his theological leanings are, though.
Logged

Coburn In 2012
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1215


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: January 06, 2010, 11:43:15 am »
Ignore

That's sad when you can link Coburn and the word liberal in any sense.

Yeah it is actually a crime to connect him in any way with liberalism, but he would meet my definition of economic liberalism.

There is nothing liberal about the greatest patriot in the Senate.  Coburn is anti welfare, anti nanny state, anti liberal in every way.  Plus like a true conservative he wants every dime accounted for and he wants people to answer for how they spend.

He is the anti pork crusader.  How can you call that liberal.  Liberal = pork.
Logged

If the Republican Party continues to ignore its conservative base, then the Party is headed to oblivion.

Jerome Corsi
Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29151
United States


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: January 06, 2010, 06:53:21 pm »
Ignore

That's sad when you can link Coburn and the word liberal in any sense.

Yeah it is actually a crime to connect him in any way with liberalism, but he would meet my definition of economic liberalism.

There is nothing liberal about the greatest patriot in the Senate.  Coburn is anti welfare, anti nanny state, anti liberal in every way.  Plus like a true conservative he wants every dime accounted for and he wants people to answer for how they spend.

He is the anti pork crusader.  How can you call that liberal.  Liberal = pork.

Ever heard of Thad Cochran, or Saxby Chambliss? Both are conservatives, both are porkers.
Logged

He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again! Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!



5280
MagneticFree
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2671
United States


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: January 06, 2010, 10:01:11 pm »
Ignore

Interesting thread to read!
Logged

Paul/Cruz 2016!
Vepres
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8103
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.26, S: -7.39

View Profile
« Reply #29 on: January 06, 2010, 10:08:27 pm »
Ignore

Jim Douglas, maybe Cao
Logged

LOL, Failure

Alright, if Republicans gain less than 75 seats, I'll prominently display my failure in my signature.
realisticidealist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6428
Vatican City State


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: 2.78

View Profile
« Reply #30 on: January 07, 2010, 12:44:29 am »
Ignore

John Hoeven has never particularly shied away from fiscal spending, especially for education and infrastructure projects.
Logged

"The greatest thing you'll ever learn is just to love and be loved in return."
Badger
badger
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10406
United States


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: January 07, 2010, 10:42:38 am »
Ignore

Based on support of the stimulus and at least passing support of health care reform, Snowe.
Logged
Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29151
United States


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: January 08, 2010, 10:10:51 am »
Ignore

John Hoeven has never particularly shied away from fiscal spending, especially for education and infrastructure projects.

North Dakota is certainly better off for it. Hoeven for President in 2016!!!!

Logged

He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again! Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!



Badger
badger
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10406
United States


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: January 12, 2010, 01:05:28 pm »
Ignore

John Hoeven has never particularly shied away from fiscal spending, especially for education and infrastructure projects.

North Dakota Every state is certainly better off for it. Hoeven Vote Democratic for President in 2016!!!!



Corrected.
Logged
perdedor
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2628
United States


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: January 15, 2010, 11:50:41 am »
Ignore

To make an rather boring and predictable point, it depends on definition of "liberal", assuming we are using the term to mean "left-wing", I can't think of many. I know Cao voted for the stimulus, but I can't think of any current Republican that would fit in with the *old Republican party of the mid to late 1800's (pro-tariff, anti-trust, anti-big business).


*I understand that these aren't universal principles of that century's Republican Party (namely the likes of Rutherford Hayes and James Garfield)
Logged

shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11160
Russian Federation


View Profile WWW
« Reply #35 on: March 11, 2010, 04:26:09 pm »
Ignore

To make an rather boring and predictable point, it depends on definition of "liberal", assuming we are using the term to mean "left-wing", I can't think of many. I know Cao voted for the stimulus, but I can't think of any current Republican that would fit in with the *old Republican party of the mid to late 1800's (pro-tariff, anti-trust, anti-big business).


*I understand that these aren't universal principles of that century's Republican Party (namely the likes of Rutherford Hayes and James Garfield)

late 19thc GOP: anti-monopoly? yes. anti-big business? no.

as for the original question: Snowe.
Logged

Mechaman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13699
Jamaica


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: March 11, 2010, 04:32:46 pm »
Ignore

To make an rather boring and predictable point, it depends on definition of "liberal", assuming we are using the term to mean "left-wing", I can't think of many. I know Cao voted for the stimulus, but I can't think of any current Republican that would fit in with the *old Republican party of the mid to late 1800's (pro-tariff, anti-trust, anti-big business).


*I understand that these aren't universal principles of that century's Republican Party (namely the likes of Rutherford Hayes and James Garfield)

Pro-tariff equals anti big business?
Are you f***ing kidding me? I thought the point of a high protective tariff was to make American business bigger.
Logged

James Rivington
Full Member
***
Posts: 156
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.42, S: 3.43

View Profile
« Reply #37 on: March 11, 2010, 04:39:33 pm »
Ignore

pro-tariff, anti-trust, anti-big business


Does not follow.
Logged



SDP-WV
Senator Libertas
Libertas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14781
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.48, S: -9.22

View Profile
« Reply #38 on: March 11, 2010, 04:54:24 pm »
Ignore

You can only choose from both houses of Congress and any governor of any U.S. state.

When I said "Economically Liberal" I mean someone who supports an economic policy that favors ordinary Americans at the expense of the rich.

Using that definition, Ron Paul.
Logged
Bo
Rochambeau
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14388
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

View Profile
« Reply #39 on: March 25, 2010, 11:46:21 pm »
Ignore

You can only choose from both houses of Congress and any governor of any U.S. state.

When I said "Economically Liberal" I mean someone who supports an economic policy that favors ordinary Americans at the expense of the rich.

Using that definition, Ron Paul.

Haha very funny.
Logged

TheGlobalizer
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3304
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -7.13

View Profile
« Reply #40 on: April 14, 2010, 06:00:53 pm »
Ignore

I'm still not clear but what "economically liberal" means in the context of this thread.

Are "ordinary Americans" small businesspeople, middle class, working class, the poor, or what?

I would say Ron Paul for non-corporatist definitions, but he would certainly seem to favor businesspeople over workers.  Not sure if we're using a more left-leaning populist definition.
Logged
Carlos Danger
wormyguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8404
Liechtenstein


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: July 21, 2010, 05:28:22 pm »
Ignore

Not counting his anti-free trade votes.  It's not his intention to protect labor in those cases.
Yes it is.
Logged

Bo
Rochambeau
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14388
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52

View Profile
« Reply #42 on: July 27, 2010, 05:58:31 pm »
Ignore

I'm still not clear but what "economically liberal" means in the context of this thread.

Are "ordinary Americans" small businesspeople, middle class, working class, the poor, or what?

I would say Ron Paul for non-corporatist definitions, but he would certainly seem to favor businesspeople over workers.  Not sure if we're using a more left-leaning populist definition.

Yes, ordinary people are small businesspeople, middle class, working class, and the poor in the context of this question.
Logged

Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines