Why do you support Israel's right to exist?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 03:49:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Why do you support Israel's right to exist?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
Poll
Question: Why do you support Israel's right to exist?
#1
Because it is a modern democracy
 
#2
Because it is a US ally
 
#3
Because the Jewish people have a right to a safe homeland.
 
#4
Because it is to play a vital role in the end of the world.
 
#5
Other reason (specify)
 
#6
I don't.  I'm neutral (really?)
 
#7
I don't, because the land was wrongly taken from the Palistinians.
 
#8
I don't Death to the infidels.
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 94

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Why do you support Israel's right to exist?  (Read 14020 times)
Citizen James
James42
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,540


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -2.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 25, 2009, 04:27:09 PM »

I have phrased the question as a 'why' rather than a 'do' as support for Israel in the US is near universal (and rather common in the western world overall), however I think there are major differences in why that support is.

Some right wingers accuse the left of not supporting Israel as much (that is, not completely blindly) because we do sometimes criticize some of their policies.  I think part of that is based on how the nation is seen - as a modern democracy, or as a religious icon.  Whereas in the religious right Israels safety is considered only a temporary concern - based on their desire for armageddon and eventual widespread destruction.  Others (such as neocons) see it  as a stepping stone for increasing influence in the region not caring for whether it is fair or not (we have often allied with dictators for temporary gain.  For example, we opposed freedom and democracy in South Africa because the fearmongers kept insisting that a government by, of, and for the people was practically the definition of socialism)

I added a few other options, just to cover all the bases.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2009, 04:45:07 PM »
« Edited: September 25, 2009, 04:49:35 PM by phknrocket1k »

Israel should be supported up as a Western counter to the Muslims.
Logged
Bunwahaha [still dunno why, but well, so be it]
tsionebreicruoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,385
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2009, 05:07:04 PM »

I don't especially support them, I'm neutral. Really.

I just allow myself to comment what I like/agree with and what I don't like/disagree with, what's happening there.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2009, 05:19:33 PM »

The first three.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,609
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 25, 2009, 05:37:59 PM »

I support Israel's "right to exist" for the same reason that I support the "right to exist" of any country. Yes, Israel has a few dodgy foundational issues. So do most countries. Now, supporting the policies of the current government would be a very different question and would get a very different sort of answer.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 25, 2009, 05:41:21 PM »

Option 7, but the idea of a "right to exist" is really totally irrelevant.
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 25, 2009, 05:46:13 PM »

Option 7, but the idea of a "right to exist" is really totally irrelevant.

Option 6, but same idea.
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 25, 2009, 05:52:31 PM »

Because it's their land.
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 25, 2009, 05:56:13 PM »

Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 25, 2009, 06:00:59 PM »


What does this even mean?
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 25, 2009, 07:14:33 PM »

I do, because two injustices do not a justice make.  One may disagree on whether creating Israel was an appropriate thing to do (I, personally, believe it was not), but by now there are some 5 million or more people for whom this is the only conceivable home. At this point, I think, Israel is a fact, and its existence does not need any justification beyond the one needed by any other nation state: it is there, and getting rid of it would be a personal disaster for many. 

At the same time, I firmly reject the idea of Israel as a Jewish state that has anything to do w/ myself. Israel is an Israeli state, the state of the Israeli people, which, in my view, has little, if anything, to do w/ those of us in the diaspora. I have no loyalty to it whatsoever, and I'd be offended if anyone suggested as much. Though I, personally, do not like a lot about Israel, I have to recognize the fact that it is sufficiently a liberal democracy - of course, only within its recognized borders - to provide its citizens with legitimate opportunities for influencing political process and the structure of the state. Thus, though I may dislike a lot of things about the Israeli state, my dislike is not much different from my dislike of Switzerland (another place some of my ancestors once called home - I do have crappy ancestral homelands, to think about it Smiley ) or South Korea.

Now,  though Israeli existence itself, at this point, needs no further justification, the same is not true for the status of the Occupied Territories (including, for that matter, East Jerusalem). These are not part of the Israeli liberal polity and the way Israel has been behaving itself there justifies international concern. The status quo there is unacceptable for the same reason Israel's right to exist is indisputable: continuation of it is creating multiple personal tragedies. Whether the status quo is replaced w/ two states or w/ a single bi-communal Israeli-Palestinian state (frankly, my preferred option), either outcome would be an acceptable improvement. The current situation should not continue.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,846
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 25, 2009, 07:30:59 PM »

Just doing otherwise is too much trouble.
Logged
Ban my account ffs!
snowguy716
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,632
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: September 25, 2009, 08:39:08 PM »

The Jewish people deserve a safe homeland.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: September 25, 2009, 08:40:45 PM »

I think they should practise what they preach, Have a one state solution and intermarry with the Palestinians.

That isn't what they preach, troll.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,846
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: September 25, 2009, 08:42:20 PM »

The Jewish people deserve a safe homeland.

You know, there were probably *much* safer places than Palestine circa 1947 to go. Large parts of South America are/were barely inhabited (Central Brazil; why not?), Western Australia?, South Island (New Zealand), Various Carribean or Pacific Islands....

Not that I would criticize those individual migrants from Europe or anything.
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: September 25, 2009, 09:49:17 PM »

I think they should practise what they preach, Have a one state solution and intermarry with the Palestinians.

This is, very clearly, not what almost anyone there preaches. I might say, this is unfortunately, but the fact is: this would be directly against whatever Zionist doctrine that is out there.
Logged
Earth
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,548


Political Matrix
E: -9.61, S: -9.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: September 25, 2009, 10:51:54 PM »

The Jewish people deserve a safe homeland.

Europe is less safe than Israel?

I don't support Israel, and it was a mistake to create a nation that treats it's natives as second class citizens, or worse yet, scum. This issue is completely beyond anything resembling 'rights'.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,963
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: September 26, 2009, 04:04:10 AM »

Reasons 1 and 3. Every people has the right to have a country.
Logged
John Dibble
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,733
Japan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: September 26, 2009, 07:38:37 AM »

Other - they've been there long enough that a few generations have passed and removing them would be like removing the natives in any other location. Israel has some bad policies towards the Palestinians and probably shouldn't have been founded in that location in the first place, but at this point it would be rather dumb to just think that they should pack their bags and leave. It would be like saying everyone in America should pack up and leave so the Native Americans can have their land back - at this point it's just not gonna happen, and even if people were willing the logistical issues of doing so would be insane.
Logged
Earth
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,548


Political Matrix
E: -9.61, S: -9.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: September 26, 2009, 11:38:29 AM »

....It would be like saying everyone in America should pack up and leave so the Native Americans can have their land back - at this point it's just not gonna happen, and even if people were willing the logistical issues of doing so would be insane.

I don't think this is directed at what I said, but on the off chance it is, that's not what I meant. I'd never advocate for a 'pick up and leave' "solution" in this. People are there to stay, that's a given.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: September 26, 2009, 11:54:53 AM »

Because the Jewish people have a right to a safe homeland

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Awful...
Logged
Bunwahaha [still dunno why, but well, so be it]
tsionebreicruoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,385
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: September 26, 2009, 11:57:12 AM »
« Edited: September 26, 2009, 11:59:43 AM by Benwah »

The Jewish people deserve a safe homeland.

Well, if we consider this only argument, then my advice to "the Jewish people" is to get off from there!! And fast!

This part of the world might be the less safe for them today...

Actually, beside the Zionist justifications, on which I wouldn't debate, I don't feel concerned by that, if we take the only argument of a safe home, then they could have stayed in Europe. The Holocaust, because of the awful (forgive my English, other words may be more appropriate to what it has been) thing it has been, made it. While it burned a lot of people, it burned with them all the anti-semite feelings that existed, (well or at least the huge part of them), and that's a luck we can say that "at least", it permitted this, it created a vaccine against anti-semitism in West, making that West may now be the safest place for Jew, more than ever. And maybe to the point that it becomes sometimes a bit too much when we see the growing paranoia here concerning the anti-Jews feelings.

Yes, since the end of the nazi regime, the only problem that people had with Jews it is about Zionism, it is no more against Jew, the big problem is Israel, no more the Jewish people, which wasn't the case before, before Jews had to face an actual anti-semitism. One more example of this is that, in the first part of the last century, the Arab leaders, seeing that they needed to modernize their lands, called some Jews, because they found they were smart and able to help them to modernize themselves, they even proposed some territories to these Jews then. Unluckily the deal didn't work, and unluckily I've forgotten the references about this historical episode, maybe others heard about it.

Actually, there is no more the actual anti-semitism of before today, there is just some anti-zionism, so this argument of the safe land may be the last to use. After, of course, the Zionist issue became so much passionated that it revived all the old fantasies, but these ones are no more the source of hatred they were before.

Note that here I'm not advocating against Israel, just stating about this argument.

And, no, I'm not really neutral. I think Israel can carry some big improvements in this region, but this to only one condition, that they stop to claim for a "Jewish" state. They wanna continue? May they enjoy their sorrow, and surely their destruction on the long term...

I'm not neutral, I plead for an only state, the creation of a new entity, with the both people, Arabs and Jews, overcoming their identity to create a new one. The f**k, that would be beautiful, and strong. It's them to see...
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: September 26, 2009, 12:25:25 PM »

Option 3, and none else. There were certainly better places to put them, however.
Logged
Bunwahaha [still dunno why, but well, so be it]
tsionebreicruoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,385
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: September 26, 2009, 12:27:29 PM »

Option 3, and none else. There were certainly better places to put them, however.

No assumptions intended, but, hmm, here you speak a bit like if it was some cattle, which is not very welcome, especially when we refer to the post-Holocaust period...
Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,306
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: September 26, 2009, 12:29:54 PM »

Option 3, and none else. There were certainly better places to put them, however.

Name three.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 14 queries.