Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 19, 2014, 06:50:39 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Don't forget to get your 2013 Gubernatorial Endorsements and Predictions in!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2012 Elections (Moderators: Mr. Morden, Bacon King, Sheriff Buford TX Justice)
| | |-+  PPP: Obama beats all Republicans
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: PPP: Obama beats all Republicans  (Read 1364 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34105
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -6.09

View Profile
« on: October 22, 2009, 02:53:09 pm »
Ignore

Obama vs. Huckabee: 47-43
Obama vs. Romney: 48-40
Obama vs. Palin: 52-40
Obama vs. Pawlenty: 50-30

PPP conducted a national survey of 766 registered voters from October 16th to 19th. The surveys margin of error is +/-3.5%. Other factors, such as refusal to be interviewed and weighting, may introduce additional error that is more difficult to quantify.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_National_1022424.pdf
Logged
Aizen
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4540


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -9.22

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2009, 03:31:18 pm »
Ignore

Obama vs. Huckabee: 47-43


Wow
Logged
DariusNJ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 423


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 22, 2009, 03:34:03 pm »
Ignore

This poll also had Obama approval at 51-43.
Logged
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 38690
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 22, 2009, 03:36:47 pm »
Ignore


PPP's polling has always had Huckabee close to Obama.
Logged



As expected the wop won.

Eraserhead's Original Update: Open For Business 24/7
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9466
Czech Republic


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 22, 2009, 05:28:56 pm »
Ignore


PPP's polling has always had Huckabee close to Obama.


You mean closer than all of the others.
Logged

Clearly the solution is to privatize presidential elections.

So, in less than four years, get excited for the 2016 MetLife Financial U Pick The Prez Extravaganza. If you tweet a picture of your completed ballot with the hashtag #ivoted, you could win a trip for two to the inauguration or an iTunes gift card.
Rowan
RowanBrandon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6714


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 22, 2009, 05:32:05 pm »
Ignore

Huckabee polls better than the others in the Midwest and the South.
Logged
YankeeFan007
Dem4Life
Full Member
***
Posts: 140


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 22, 2009, 06:07:15 pm »
Ignore

Yes, I bet the Democrats would love another Republican who lacks knowledge in economics.  Let's be honest.  The next election is going to be about the state of the economy.  Huckabee's strength lies in christian values vote.  However, when the economy is struggling people seem to put religion in the back of their mind. 
Logged
pbrower2a
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10112
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: October 24, 2009, 02:41:55 pm »
Ignore

Obama vs. Huckabee: 47-43
Obama vs. Romney: 48-40
Obama vs. Palin: 52-40
Obama vs. Pawlenty: 50-30

PPP conducted a national survey of 766 registered voters from October 16th to 19th. The surveys margin of error is +/-3.5%. Other factors, such as refusal to be interviewed and weighting, may introduce additional error that is more difficult to quantify.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_National_1022424.pdf

Ignore the part that does not respond or give a "don't know/other" response, and the proportions go to

Obama vs. Huckabee: 47-43 52.2 - 47.8 (looks much like 2008)
Obama vs. Romney: 48-40  54.5 - 45.5  (Bush 1988)
Obama vs. Palin: 52-40  56.5 - 43.5 (Eisenhower 1956)
Obama vs. Pawlenty: 50-30 62.5 - 37.5 (LBJ 1964)

Obama would probably defeat Mike Huckabee by winning the same states that Obama won in 2008 while adding Missouri and Arizona and making Montana and the Dakotas very shaky (but those three states yield only nine electoral votes). Huckabee would do nothing to cut into the Blue Firewall, but he might gain in the southern US in states that McCain won. That could be the best electoral result imaginable for the GOP, and it would still be a loss.

Romney would probably cut slightly into Obama's large wins in the Blue Firewall but at the risk of making the South shaky. He might swing Indiana and NE-02 but at the expense of making states like Tennessee, Georgia, and Kentucky shaky. He has no chance to win either Massachusetts or Michigan. In the best scenario for him he would force Obama to participate in a truly-national campaign instead of working on margins in a few "battleground" states  in a polarized country as Obama did in 2008, which would be a good thing for America. 

Palin is of course a political disaster. Economic realities could trump cultural resentments in 2012, and she can win only if she can unify those against Obama. If Obama succeeds in getting economic improvements in the areas that Palin declared the "Real America", then she loses in a landslide reminiscent of 1984.

I find it hard to believe that Pawlenty would get a McGovern-like result; the low polling for him may better reflect that he isn't well known. Where he is best known (Minnesota) he loses.   


Logged



Your political compass

Economic Left/Right: -7.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.49
Duke
AHDuke99
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19830


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: October 24, 2009, 02:44:37 pm »
Ignore

Yes, I bet the Democrats would love another Republican who lacks knowledge in economics.  Let's be honest.  The next election is going to be about the state of the economy.  Huckabee's strength lies in christian values vote.  However, when the economy is struggling people seem to put religion in the back of their mind. 

We would hope that would be the case. But with the current GOP base, I'm not so sure. If we are still in the dumps economically in 2012, Romney should be the nominee. I don't want another race about the economy to occur where neither candidate knows anything about it.
Logged
Mechaman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13908
Jamaica


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: October 24, 2009, 08:17:13 pm »
Ignore

Logged



23:19   Xahar   you're literally a white dude Mechaman
○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31632


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: October 24, 2009, 08:19:58 pm »
Ignore

Obama vs. Pawlenty: 50-30

Wow, that's Pawlenty of a lead.
Logged
DariusNJ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 423


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: October 24, 2009, 09:23:28 pm »
Ignore

Obama vs. Pawlenty: 50-30

Wow, that's Pawlenty of a lead.

He's not well known at all, much of that 20% undecided would go for him. He'd get the same result as Romney, maybe slightly lower.
Logged
RIP Robert H Bork
officepark
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9466
Czech Republic


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: October 24, 2009, 09:32:33 pm »
Ignore

Obama vs. Pawlenty: 50-30

Wow, that's Pawlenty of a lead.

He's not well known at all, much of that 20% undecided would go for him. He'd get the same result as Romney, maybe slightly lower.

I too expected it to be name recognition; he is less known than any of the others. Without that I doubt that he would be doing so badly.
Logged

Clearly the solution is to privatize presidential elections.

So, in less than four years, get excited for the 2016 MetLife Financial U Pick The Prez Extravaganza. If you tweet a picture of your completed ballot with the hashtag #ivoted, you could win a trip for two to the inauguration or an iTunes gift card.
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines