"I made it very plain we will not have an all-volunteer army" - GW Bush today
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 11:45:54 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
  "I made it very plain we will not have an all-volunteer army" - GW Bush today
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: "I made it very plain we will not have an all-volunteer army" - GW Bush today  (Read 11012 times)
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: October 17, 2004, 03:51:07 PM »

In cases like Iraq
Logged
CollectiveInterest
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 511


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: October 17, 2004, 03:53:26 PM »


What details made it appropriate for Iraq?
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: October 17, 2004, 03:56:03 PM »

A 12-year old enemy who wouldn't quit pursuing weapons of mass destruction. Regime change has been our policy since '98 and it was time to bump him off.

In Iran, we should just immediately destroy any nuclear reactor.
Logged
CollectiveInterest
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 511


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: October 17, 2004, 03:59:25 PM »

A 12-year old enemy who wouldn't quit pursuing weapons of mass destruction. Regime change has been our policy since '98 and it was time to bump him off.

In Iran, we should just immediately destroy any nuclear reactor.

You do understand Iraq didn't have nuclear weapons? It didn't have a nuclear weapons program? And it offered to let UN inspectors verify this, but Bush said it was "too late" and invaded anyway?
Logged
ATFFL
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,754
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: October 17, 2004, 04:00:37 PM »

Indeed. This sort of thing is low indeed. Remember the draftee of said draft is a Democrat.

What is pressuring the USA to consider a draft?

Lack of volunteer enlistment?

Enlistment is still strong, especially for the AF, CG and Navy.  The only area having trouble is the NG and Reserves, but they are no where near critical levels.

Can the U.S. military put two more divisions in Iraq with the current manpower? Can the U.S. military take military action against Syria, Iran or N. Korea with the current manpower levels and the requirements of occupying Iraq?

In order:

yes, but the military is not asking for it.
Yes
Yes
No.  The plan for N. Korea would require more manpower.

These countries haven't been weakened by sanctions. Iran in particular would require a draft. Syria would stretch our army to the breaking point, and would likely require a draft.

Syria has no signifigant military.  By relocating forces from areas like Europe Syria could be defeated and occupied. 

All we would haev to do to get Turkey along for the ride is to threaten to break Syria up and give the Kurds an independent state.  It is what we should have done in Iraq.

Iran could be invaded by using air power to suppress their military and letting local troops on the ground overthrow the mullahs.   There is a real question as to how the Iranian military would react if the mullahs were being attacked.

Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.