Obama Gets a Pass - What if Bush had done that?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 08:08:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Obama Gets a Pass - What if Bush had done that?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Obama Gets a Pass - What if Bush had done that?  (Read 2228 times)
Coburn In 2012
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,201


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: October 31, 2009, 02:12:37 PM »

Josh Gerstein – Tue Oct 27, 6:02 am ET

A four-hour stop in New Orleans, on his way to a $3 million fundraiser.
Snubbing the Dalai Lama.

Signing off on a secret deal with drug makers.

Freezing out a TV network.

Doing more fundraisers than the last president. More golf, too.

President Barack Obama has done all of those things — and more.
What’s remarkable is what hasn’t happened. These episodes haven’t become metaphors for Obama’s personal and political character — or consuming controversies that sidetracked the rest of his agenda.
It’s a sign that the media’s echo chamber can be a funny thing, prone to the vagaries of news judgment, and an illustration that, in politics, context is everything.

Conservatives look on with a mix of indignation and amazement and ask: Imagine the fuss if George W. Bush had done these things?

And quickly add, with a hint of jealousy: How does Obama get away with it?



AH YES...THERE IS THE CHANGE WE CAN BELEIVE IN!!!!!!!!!

And how does he get away with it?  Gee I dont know.  Maybe because if any one critizes him they are labelled a racist or a white supremicist.  Which is ironic because if any one is racist it is obama and his pastor.
Logged
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: October 31, 2009, 05:11:34 PM »

Umm, Obama didn't take a month long vacation where he ignored a memo titled "Bin Laden determined to strike in US", with said vacation followed by a massive terrorist attack, which was then followed by a 91% approval rating. This thread is truly an epic fail.

Just like Obama's ignoring warnings about the deficit!:D
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,866
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: October 31, 2009, 05:28:26 PM »

Umm, Obama didn't take a month long vacation where he ignored a memo titled "Bin Laden determined to strike in US", with said vacation followed by a massive terrorist attack, which was then followed by a 91% approval rating. This thread is truly an epic fail.

Just like Obama's ignoring warnings about the deficit!:D

I thought that Reagan proved that deficits don't matter.
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: October 31, 2009, 05:33:06 PM »

FYI, the post I made wasn't my opinion...
Logged
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: October 31, 2009, 11:21:20 PM »

Umm, Obama didn't take a month long vacation where he ignored a memo titled "Bin Laden determined to strike in US", with said vacation followed by a massive terrorist attack, which was then followed by a 91% approval rating. This thread is truly an epic fail.

Just like Obama's ignoring warnings about the deficit! Cheesy

I thought that Reagan proved that deficits don't matter.

Reagan's domestic policies left a lot to be desired. His tax cuts were good, as was his foreign policy, but the deficits were a big negative, which is why he is not one of the "great" Presidents in my mind. I have no idealized image of Reagan, though he was better than most other politicians of the time.

I have a green avatar for a reason, I am open-minded (or try to be).
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,708
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: November 01, 2009, 12:39:36 AM »

Umm, Obama didn't take a month long vacation where he ignored a memo titled "Bin Laden determined to strike in US", with said vacation followed by a massive terrorist attack, which was then followed by a 91% approval rating. This thread is truly an epic fail.

Just like Obama's ignoring warnings about the deficit! Cheesy

I thought that Reagan proved that deficits don't matter.

Reagan's domestic policies left a lot to be desired. His tax cuts were good, as was his foreign policy, but the deficits were a big negative, which is why he is not one of the "great" Presidents in my mind. I have no idealized image of Reagan, though he was better than most other politicians of the time.

I have a green avatar for a reason, I am open-minded (or try to be).

The deficits were a result of the tax cuts.

You can't have your cake and eat it too.
Logged
paul718
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,012


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: November 01, 2009, 12:01:59 PM »

Umm, Obama didn't take a month long vacation where he ignored a memo titled "Bin Laden determined to strike in US", with said vacation followed by a massive terrorist attack, which was then followed by a 91% approval rating. This thread is truly an epic fail.

Just like Obama's ignoring warnings about the deficit! Cheesy

I thought that Reagan proved that deficits don't matter.

Reagan's domestic policies left a lot to be desired. His tax cuts were good, as was his foreign policy, but the deficits were a big negative, which is why he is not one of the "great" Presidents in my mind. I have no idealized image of Reagan, though he was better than most other politicians of the time.

I have a green avatar for a reason, I am open-minded (or try to be).

The deficits were a result of the tax cuts.

You can't have your cake and eat it too.

Federal revenues increased after Reagan's tax cuts. 
Logged
Jacobtm
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,216


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: November 01, 2009, 12:46:20 PM »

What if terrorist attacks occured on American soil on Obama's watch?
What if Obama started 2 wars that were to each last longer than US involvement in WWII?
What if Obama made nearly the whole world hate us, to the point that maniacs like Huge Chavez seemed like "good guys"?

Far from the disaster that Bush was.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,866
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: November 01, 2009, 12:51:52 PM »

Umm, Obama didn't take a month long vacation where he ignored a memo titled "Bin Laden determined to strike in US", with said vacation followed by a massive terrorist attack, which was then followed by a 91% approval rating. This thread is truly an epic fail.

Just like Obama's ignoring warnings about the deficit! Cheesy

I thought that Reagan proved that deficits don't matter.

Reagan's domestic policies left a lot to be desired. His tax cuts were good, as was his foreign policy, but the deficits were a big negative, which is why he is not one of the "great" Presidents in my mind. I have no idealized image of Reagan, though he was better than most other politicians of the time.

I have a green avatar for a reason, I am open-minded (or try to be).

The deficits were a result of the tax cuts.

You can't have your cake and eat it too.

Federal revenues increased after Reagan's tax cuts. 

Yes, because the Democratic congress forced him to raise taxes.
Logged
War on Want
Evilmexicandictator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,643
Uzbekistan


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -8.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: November 01, 2009, 01:28:42 PM »

I will never understand the obsession some people have with the deficit. Going by historical and international standards our debt really is not at terrible levels yet. 76.5% of our GDP is debt. Yeah that's bad but losing your sh**t over that figure is stupid considering that the federal debt hit 109% of our GDP after World War 2. European countries have racked up even larger amounts of debt. Britain had over 200% of their GDP as debt right after World War 2 and no financial crisis occured. After World War 2 Britain started implementing their universal healthcare system and had strong years of growth.

The last time a country collapsed because of debt was in the early 1700's(The Netherlands). I don't think America has anything to worry about.
Logged
paul718
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,012


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: November 01, 2009, 01:52:35 PM »

I will never understand the obsession some people have with the deficit. Going by historical and international standards our debt really is not at terrible levels yet. 76.5% of our GDP is debt. Yeah that's bad but losing your sh**t over that figure is stupid considering that the federal debt hit 109% of our GDP after World War 2. European countries have racked up even larger amounts of debt. Britain had over 200% of their GDP as debt right after World War 2 and no financial crisis occured. After World War 2 Britain started implementing their universal healthcare system and had strong years of growth.

The last time a country collapsed because of debt was in the early 1700's(The Netherlands). I don't think America has anything to worry about.

debt --> taxes

People are scared of higher taxes, rather than the deficit itself.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,914


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: November 01, 2009, 02:29:57 PM »

If the economy grows, then a larger debt can be paid off even without increasing tax rates. If the economy shrinks, then even a fixed level of debt that seems low at first can become crippling and painful.

So the important thing is that the money to spent towards investments that will help the United States economy in the long run. Can we look back in 25 to 30 years and say 'I'm glad we spent money on that'? Infrastructure, science, and education improvements all come to mind. Simply encouraging more consumer spending is not the answer.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.232 seconds with 12 queries.