Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 07:23:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Public Discussion on the Supreme Court Cases (Avoid Cluttering Case Threads)  (Read 70634 times)
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« on: June 25, 2012, 10:25:38 PM »
I, along with (I'd assume) many other Atlasians (including several in the Labor & Whig parties), are publicly voicing their concern and whatnot about Tweed's lawsuit (which I am very concerned about publicly), while privately hoping Tweed triumphs (as Simfan put it) 'for the lulz'.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #1 on: June 27, 2012, 09:34:33 AM »
Quote from: HagridOfTheDeep on June 27, 2012, 01:50:40 AM
How funny would it be if the Court heeded Tweed's advice re: Napoleon but instead appointed clarence? Tongue

Nah, they should just appoint Duke/Cincy. The choice of The People!
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,329
« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2012, 08:40:55 AM »
« Edited: July 04, 2012, 10:06:47 AM by IDS Legislator SJoyceFla »
The way I interpret the ruling, the only concrete effects are we can't accept it and we can't publicly exchange it. Can we initiate impeachment proceedings now?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.