Quinnipiac: Kasich and Strickland are tied
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 11:01:12 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Quinnipiac: Kasich and Strickland are tied
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Quinnipiac: Kasich and Strickland are tied  (Read 2944 times)
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 11, 2009, 12:58:43 PM »

Strickland: 40%
Kasich: 40%
Undecided/Other: 20%

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1322.xml?ReleaseID=1394

I think this is shaping up to be an interesting race.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2009, 01:05:04 PM »

As long as Quinnipiac (R) isn't secretly working for the Kasich campaign....

but anyway, aren't those numbers an improvement for Ted?

/exits the spin zone
Logged
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2009, 01:11:07 PM »

No those numbers aren't an improvement for Strickland.  The last Quinnipiac poll (9/15) was 46-36 in favor of Ted.

http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2009/11/11/oh-gov-poll-economy-weighs-down-strickland/



Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2009, 01:37:22 PM »

I posted this in the 2010 section. Wink
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2009, 01:40:04 PM »

No those numbers aren't an improvement for Strickland.  The last Quinnipiac poll (9/15) was 46-36 in favor of Ted.

http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2009/11/11/oh-gov-poll-economy-weighs-down-strickland/






fair enough.  I guess I was thinking of some of the other polls that have had Kasich ahead.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 11, 2009, 01:51:57 PM »

No those numbers aren't an improvement for Strickland.  The last Quinnipiac poll (9/15) was 46-36 in favor of Ted.

http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2009/11/11/oh-gov-poll-economy-weighs-down-strickland/






fair enough.  I guess I was thinking of some of the other polls that have had Kasich ahead.

Only Rasmussen, I think.  Though I seem to remember PPP saying it was basically tied.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 11, 2009, 02:00:54 PM »

a'ight, anyway, I think we can all agree that Kasich is looking more and more like a credible candidate.
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2009, 06:44:31 PM »

Assuming Kasich gets his fundraising in gear. At the end of the first half of the year, Strickland had about a 9-1 cash on hand advantage.
Logged
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 11, 2009, 07:01:39 PM »

Wow, last I looked at this race (winter of last year admittedly), Strickland was thought to win easily IIRC.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,795
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 11, 2009, 07:03:35 PM »

Wow, last I looked at this race (winter of last year admittedly), Strickland was thought to win easily IIRC.

Well, in the meantime he caught, like most governors, a severe case of recessionitis. 
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2009, 07:09:00 PM »

It really is amazing though how the winds have shifted though. In Q's first poll in February, Strickland was up by 30 points over Kasich. And now it is tied, without much shift in Kasich's name recognition.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,316
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 12, 2009, 08:35:27 PM »

Yep, as long as Bush's recession holds out for another year, the Republicans might be able to score some wins.
Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: November 13, 2009, 05:54:19 AM »

Yep, as long as Bush's recession holds out for another year, the Republicans might be able to score some wins.

Portman also seems to be a fairly talented candidate while Fisher seems to be a bit of an old fart.
If Portman wins in 2010, I would place him among the five most likely senators to be president someday.

And I dislike the guy and whatnot, but he's in the top 1% of well connected types and seems more polished than most first time state-wide campaigners.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,795
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: November 13, 2009, 06:25:22 AM »

Yep, as long as Bush's recession holds out for another year, the Republicans might be able to score some wins.

Portman also seems to be a fairly talented candidate while Fisher seems to be a bit of an old fart.
If Portman wins in 2010, I would place him among the five most likely senators to be president someday.

And I dislike the guy and whatnot, but he's in the top 1% of well connected types and seems more polished than most first time state-wide campaigners.

Yeah, I always wondered why the handiccapers like Cillizza thought that the Democrats had the advantage here. Probably they assumed that Portman's ties to Bush's administration would overwhelm his other advantages.
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: November 14, 2009, 01:31:15 AM »

OUCH!  WTF?
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: November 14, 2009, 07:02:47 AM »

If Portman wins in 2010, I would place him among the five most likely senators to be president someday.

...and the most likely senator to be the 2012 GOP VP nominee (IMHO).
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: November 14, 2009, 08:17:50 AM »

If Portman wins in 2010, I would place him among the five most likely senators to be president someday.

...and the most likely senator to be the 2012 GOP VP nominee (IMHO).


Not if the nominee doesn't have foreign policy experience (which is likely at this point, considering the likely spread of candidates).
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: November 14, 2009, 05:19:12 PM »

If Portman wins in 2010, I would place him among the five most likely senators to be president someday.

...and the most likely senator to be the 2012 GOP VP nominee (IMHO).


Not if the nominee doesn't have foreign policy experience (which is likely at this point, considering the likely spread of candidates).

How do you define "foreign policy experience"?  Portman will have served in both houses of Congress and served as US trade rep.  Is that less "foreign policy experience" than any other senator who's likely to be considered for VP in 2012?  Are you expecting Romney to pick John McCain or Richard Lugar as his running mate?
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: November 14, 2009, 05:40:27 PM »

If Portman wins in 2010, I would place him among the five most likely senators to be president someday.

...and the most likely senator to be the 2012 GOP VP nominee (IMHO).


Not if the nominee doesn't have foreign policy experience (which is likely at this point, considering the likely spread of candidates).

How do you define "foreign policy experience"?  Portman will have served in both houses of Congress and served as US trade rep.  Is that less "foreign policy experience" than any other senator who's likely to be considered for VP in 2012?  Are you expecting Romney to pick John McCain or Richard Lugar as his running mate?


He was trade representative for about a year, and when he was in the House he was on the Ways and Means and Budget committees. That's a pretty thin foreign policy resume.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: November 14, 2009, 05:57:52 PM »

He was trade representative for about a year, and when he was in the House he was on the Ways and Means and Budget committees. That's a pretty thin foreign policy resume.

So what senator do you think is more likely to be the Republicans' 2012 VP nominee?
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: November 14, 2009, 06:20:19 PM »

He was trade representative for about a year, and when he was in the House he was on the Ways and Means and Budget committees. That's a pretty thin foreign policy resume.

So what senator do you think is more likely to be the Republicans' 2012 VP nominee?


Thune or one of the generic conservatives on the Foreign Relations committee. Maybe DeMint if they're feeling saucy.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 12 queries.