Bush 50 Kerry 47 says ABC/WaPo
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 10:02:12 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  Bush 50 Kerry 47 says ABC/WaPo
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Bush 50 Kerry 47 says ABC/WaPo  (Read 1927 times)
kelpie
Rookie
**
Posts: 113


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 18, 2004, 04:03:30 PM »

Kerry +1 Nader -1 vs. yesterday.

Link.
Logged
emergingDmajority1
Rookie
**
Posts: 245


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2004, 04:15:01 PM »

so it's tightened a little bit, Kerry +1 here and tied in the latest Zogby/Rasmussen figures.

I still can't figure out the Gallup stuff, perhaps it's true they oversampled Republicans by 9%? Nothing happened to warrant such a dramatic shift.
Logged
Reds4
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 789


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2004, 04:18:00 PM »

This could be a normal weekend tightening or a small shift to  Kerry. It will be interesting to see where the polls are Thursday compared to today.
Logged
kelpie
Rookie
**
Posts: 113


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2004, 04:20:52 PM »

As long as Bush keeps his re-elect number at 50+ (or 49+ at a push) the Kerry vote can harden, soften or trade votes with Nader all it wants.

It won't matter.
Logged
emergingDmajority1
Rookie
**
Posts: 245


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 18, 2004, 04:22:02 PM »
« Edited: October 18, 2004, 04:24:15 PM by emergingDmajority1 »

but what exactly caused the solid shift to Bush? It couldn't be all Mary Cheney? What was it?

Usually the Dem base is late coming together, right now you're seeing the first trickle of the flock coming home. Gore was mired at 42-44% for so long, then in the final week he shot up.

You here Dick Morris (asswipe) talk about this sometimes, the Dems are always underpolled and they tend to "grow" by 2-3 points on election day.

once again we don't know the internals, registered Dems still outnumber repubs something like 34-30, and these polls regularly oversample republicans.
Logged
Reds4
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 789


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 18, 2004, 04:26:12 PM »

Vorlon, any feel on what the daily numbers are on this one? Much appreciated!
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 18, 2004, 04:26:32 PM »

Democrats weren't very underpolled in 2002. Ask Senators Cleland, Shaheen, and Mondale.

I think Kerry ignited the Dem base in the first debate, and that is why he went up so convincingly in the polls. The 2nd and 3rd debates eroded and then eliminated Kerry's momentum.

6 months ago, I said the most Kerry would get was 47% of the popular vote. I stand by that. He is a weak candidate propped up only by a weak incumbent.

I cannot think of a challenger as weak as Kerry that has won in the last 120 years at least; 1912 is debatable but I think you have to go with extenuating circumstances in that case.
Logged
emergingDmajority1
Rookie
**
Posts: 245


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 18, 2004, 04:33:39 PM »

scientific polls showed Kerry won both the 2nd and 3rd debate, not overwhelmingly, but he still won.

This could be similar to 1976, final polls had Carter 48 Ford 50, Ford chipped away at a 25-30 point lead until he took the late lead, it ended up 50-48 Carter.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 18, 2004, 04:38:35 PM »

Link to the ABC version of this poll:

More internals given there.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/News/story?id=175712
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 18, 2004, 04:46:17 PM »

scientific polls showed Kerry won both the 2nd and 3rd debate, not overwhelmingly, but he still won.

This could be similar to 1976, final polls had Carter 48 Ford 50, Ford chipped away at a 25-30 point lead until he took the late lead, it ended up 50-48 Carter.

The question isn't who "won" the debates, it's who has shifted more support.  Ford's numbers improved during the Fall, even though Carter, arguably, won the debates.  These wins might have dampened Ford's momentum, but it didn't stop it.
Logged
Fmr. Gov. NickG
NickG
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,186


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -3.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 18, 2004, 05:28:00 PM »

Democrats weren't very underpolled in 2002. Ask Senators Cleland, Shaheen, and Mondale.

I think Kerry ignited the Dem base in the first debate, and that is why he went up so convincingly in the polls. The 2nd and 3rd debates eroded and then eliminated Kerry's momentum.

6 months ago, I said the most Kerry would get was 47% of the popular vote. I stand by that. He is a weak candidate propped up only by a weak incumbent.

I cannot think of a challenger as weak as Kerry that has won in the last 120 years at least; 1912 is debatable but I think you have to go with extenuating circumstances in that case.

1912?  But the challenger won in 1912!

I'm not sure how you are definiting weak.  Kerry is certainly a better nominee in terms of electability than Goldwater was.
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 18, 2004, 05:30:52 PM »

I know I know, I'm talking about challengers that WON.

Wilson won but it was because of the Republican split.

Kerry would be the weakest challenger to win AT LEAST since Reconstruction.
Logged
ThePrezMex
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 730
Mexico


Political Matrix
E: 5.25, S: -1.69

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 18, 2004, 06:02:57 PM »

Does anybody has the 1976 Gallup tracking poll results?

Logged
ATFFL
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,754
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 18, 2004, 06:04:09 PM »

Does anybody has the 1976 Gallup tracking poll results?





Not a tracking poll.  They did not do them until 1996, and stopped after 2000.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 18, 2004, 06:41:26 PM »

What's his job approval?
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 18, 2004, 06:43:50 PM »

53%
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 14 queries.