Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 02, 2014, 03:38:43 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Atlas Fantasy Elections
| |-+  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Gustaf, MasterJedi)
| | |-+  Fiscal Responsibility Bill [On President's Desk]
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 Print
Author Topic: Fiscal Responsibility Bill [On President's Desk]  (Read 6489 times)
Marokai Besieged
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16699
United States


View Profile
« Reply #75 on: November 30, 2009, 11:11:25 pm »
Ignore

Vepres made a valid point, education cost is making than it is harder for lower classes to climb the social ladder.

But his solution, my God, it sounds like.. like.. So-, Soc-, Socialism. Cry
Logged

Vepres
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8103
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.26, S: -7.39

View Profile
« Reply #76 on: November 30, 2009, 11:39:58 pm »
Ignore

Vepres made a valid point, education cost is making than it is harder for lower classes to climb the social ladder.

But his solution, my God, it sounds like.. like.. So-, Soc-, Socialism. Cry

I'm not as Republican as you think I am Wink

Marokai, let's agree to disagree so you can get on to your usual multi-page argument with NCYankee Tongue
Logged

LOL, Failure

Alright, if Republicans gain less than 75 seats, I'll prominently display my failure in my signature.
afleitch
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21781


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -8.17

View Profile
« Reply #77 on: December 01, 2009, 05:55:46 am »
Ignore

Okay. Well that was 5 pages of fun wasn't it Tongue

Lets pull back a bit and remember this is Atlasia. For example the whole argument about education costs being prohibitive (while valid in reality) is not particularly relevant as education in Atlasia has been made subsidised and affordable in a previous bill (partly thanks to a small tax increase)

This system is designed to play to the strengths and weaknesses in Atlasia and in its current tax system. The GM reports it would raise revenue - check. It maintains 0% taxation for the poorest that we have had for 2 years - check. It allows us to balance the costs of our extended welfare system and hopefully pay down some debt - check. I can't oppose this bill because it adresses what Atlasia needs (and Atlasia is a vastly different place from America)

It has my support.
Logged

Marokai Besieged
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16699
United States


View Profile
« Reply #78 on: December 01, 2009, 06:00:58 am »
Ignore

Okay. Well that was 5 pages of fun wasn't it Tongue

Lets pull back a bit and remember this is Atlasia. For example the whole argument about education costs being prohibitive (while valid in reality) is not particularly relevant as education in Atlasia has been made subsidised and affordable in a previous bill (partly thanks to a small tax increase)

This system is designed to play to the strengths and weaknesses in Atlasia and in its current tax system. The GM reports it would raise revenue - check. It maintains 0% taxation for the poorest that we have had for 2 years - check. It allows us to balance the costs of our extended welfare system and hopefully pay down some debt - check. I can't oppose this bill because it adresses what Atlasia needs (and Atlasia is a vastly different place from America)

It has my support.

I tried very hard to address you and Franzl's concerns, and was hoping I could have both of your backing, and I'm very happy that this bill has that. Thank you both very much.
Logged

Јas
Jas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9797
Malawi


View Profile
« Reply #79 on: December 01, 2009, 06:36:25 am »
Ignore

I'm interested in the separate provisions for tax rates for marrieds.

I'm not greatly inclined towards having tax incentives for marriage anyway but I raise the point particularly because, so far as I thought, Atlasia doesn't recognise marriage.
Logged

Funny 'cause it's true:
Very few people seriously allow facts to affect their opinions.

Franzl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21990
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #80 on: December 01, 2009, 06:57:12 am »
Ignore

I'm interested in the separate provisions for tax rates for marrieds.

I'm not greatly inclined towards having tax incentives for marriage anyway but I raise the point particularly because, so far as I thought, Atlasia doesn't recognise marriage.

I believe Atlasia issues civil unions to any two adults, right?

I suppose we could change the wording Smiley
Logged
Јas
Jas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9797
Malawi


View Profile
« Reply #81 on: December 01, 2009, 07:03:40 am »
Ignore

I'm interested in the separate provisions for tax rates for marrieds.

I'm not greatly inclined towards having tax incentives for marriage anyway but I raise the point particularly because, so far as I thought, Atlasia doesn't recognise marriage.

I believe Atlasia issues civil unions to any two adults, right?

Yeah, pretty much - subject to exceptions for incest, bigamy, etc...

I suppose we could change the wording Smiley

Yeah, but nonetheless I'd be grateful if Senators could discuss a bit why civil unions should be tax incentivised.
Logged

Funny 'cause it's true:
Very few people seriously allow facts to affect their opinions.

Franzl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21990
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #82 on: December 01, 2009, 07:08:22 am »
Ignore

Yeah, but nonetheless I'd be grateful if Senators could discuss a bit why civil unions should be tax incentivised.

Respectfully, I don't feel that they are. All it does is allow both members of a civil union to earn the same amount as if they were single. If that weren't allowed, I would feel that we would be punishing civil unions.

Logged
PASOK Leader Hashemite
Hashemite
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31340
South Africa



View Profile WWW
« Reply #83 on: December 01, 2009, 07:54:39 am »
Ignore

I was waiting on the GM's professional opinion to comment more on this bill since I'm not too well read in tax policy or economics, but I'm happy with the GM's analysis and I think this bill does offer a fine solution to the deficit.

Full support.
Logged

Vepres
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8103
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.26, S: -7.39

View Profile
« Reply #84 on: December 01, 2009, 02:46:57 pm »
Ignore

Okay. Well that was 5 pages of fun wasn't it Tongue

Lets pull back a bit and remember this is Atlasia. For example the whole argument about education costs being prohibitive (while valid in reality) is not particularly relevant as education in Atlasia has been made subsidised and affordable in a previous bill (partly thanks to a small tax increase)

This system is designed to play to the strengths and weaknesses in Atlasia and in its current tax system. The GM reports it would raise revenue - check. It maintains 0% taxation for the poorest that we have had for 2 years - check. It allows us to balance the costs of our extended welfare system and hopefully pay down some debt - check. I can't oppose this bill because it adresses what Atlasia needs (and Atlasia is a vastly different place from America)

It has my support.

I was waiting on the GM's professional opinion to comment more on this bill since I'm not too well read in tax policy or economics, but I'm happy with the GM's analysis and I think this bill does offer a fine solution to the deficit.

Full support.

*Rips hair out* Gahhh! All that debating for nothing Cry
Logged

LOL, Failure

Alright, if Republicans gain less than 75 seats, I'll prominently display my failure in my signature.
Vepres
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8103
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.26, S: -7.39

View Profile
« Reply #85 on: December 01, 2009, 02:52:01 pm »
Ignore

Quote
For example the whole argument about education costs being prohibitive (while valid in reality) is not particularly relevant as education in Atlasia has been made subsidised and affordable in a previous bill (partly thanks to a small tax increase)

Link please, I couldn't find anything subsidizing higher education on the wiki Smiley
Logged

LOL, Failure

Alright, if Republicans gain less than 75 seats, I'll prominently display my failure in my signature.
Franzl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21990
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #86 on: December 01, 2009, 02:53:23 pm »
Ignore

Quote
For example the whole argument about education costs being prohibitive (while valid in reality) is not particularly relevant as education in Atlasia has been made subsidised and affordable in a previous bill (partly thanks to a small tax increase)

Link please, I couldn't find anything subsidizing higher education on the wiki Smiley

The "Help Atlasia Study Act" that I proposed did provide subsidies for higher education.
Logged
Vepres
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8103
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.26, S: -7.39

View Profile
« Reply #87 on: December 01, 2009, 02:59:45 pm »
Ignore

Quote
For example the whole argument about education costs being prohibitive (while valid in reality) is not particularly relevant as education in Atlasia has been made subsidised and affordable in a previous bill (partly thanks to a small tax increase)

Link please, I couldn't find anything subsidizing higher education on the wiki Smiley

The "Help Atlasia Study Act" that I proposed did provide subsidies for higher education.

Ah, I was searching "education" and "scholarships". Thanks Smiley
Logged

LOL, Failure

Alright, if Republicans gain less than 75 seats, I'll prominently display my failure in my signature.
Alexander Hamilton
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9331
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13

View Profile
« Reply #88 on: December 01, 2009, 04:29:01 pm »
Ignore

I'm interested in the separate provisions for tax rates for marrieds.

I'm not greatly inclined towards having tax incentives for marriage anyway but I raise the point particularly because, so far as I thought, Atlasia doesn't recognise marriage.

I believe Atlasia issues civil unions to any two adults, right?


Why only two?

Someone needs to change this.
Logged

people suck
Marokai Besieged
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16699
United States


View Profile
« Reply #89 on: December 01, 2009, 04:30:33 pm »
Ignore

I believe I can change the wording without a formal amendment as PPT, so that's not a problem.
Logged

Marokai Besieged
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16699
United States


View Profile
« Reply #90 on: December 01, 2009, 05:53:43 pm »
Ignore

I think it's time for the final vote, we've gone as far in debate as we're going to do, I think.

I hereby open up a final vote on the following bill. Please vote Aye, Nay, or Abstain.

Quote
Fiscal Responsibility Act

Realizing that our rising budget deficit can not be left unattended indefinitely, the fundamental unfairness of our outdated income tax rates, and that we must make efforts to become more fiscally responsible, the Senate hereby authorizes the following comprehensive changes to our income tax system:

1. The following income tax brackets shall replace existing brackets for income gained in 2010 and thereafter, increasing as normal with inflation:

Single Individual

0%$0 - $8,025
14%$8,026 - $32,550
25%$32,551 - $78,850
28%$78,851 - $164,550
35%$164,551 - $367,700
41%$367,701 - $1,000,000
50%$1,000,001 - $2,500,000
60%$2,500,001+

Civil Partners Filing Jointly

0%$0 - $16,050
14%$16,051 - $65,100
25%$65,101 - $131,450
28%$131,451 - $300,300
35%$300,301 - $600,000
41%$600,001 - $1,500,000
50%$1,500,001 - $3,000,000
60%$3,000,001+

Civil Partners Filing Separately

0%$0 - $8,025
14%$8,026 - $32,550
25%$32,551 - $65,725
28%$65,726 - $150,150
35%$150,151 - $300,000
41%$300,001 - $750,000
50%$740,001 - $1,500,000
60%$1,500,001+

Head of Household

0%$0 - $11,450
14%$11,451 - $43,650
25%$43,651 - $112,650
28%$112,651 - $182,400
35%$182,401 - $367,700
41%$367,701 - $1,000,000
50%$1,000,001 - $2,500,000
60%$2,500,001+

2. The standard income tax deduction shall be raised from $5,700 to $7,000, to better care for lower income individuals and the working class of Atlasia.


One of the strongest AYEs I've ever cast in this body.
Logged

Franzl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21990
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #91 on: December 01, 2009, 05:56:29 pm »
Ignore

AYE, and this isn't hard to support for a true fiscal conservative.
Logged
afleitch
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21781


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -8.17

View Profile
« Reply #92 on: December 01, 2009, 06:05:27 pm »
Ignore

Aye.

And may I remind the Senate if this passes there is no mandate to go on a spending spree Wink Otherwise fear my diminishing wrath Tongue
Logged

PASOK Leader Hashemite
Hashemite
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31340
South Africa



View Profile WWW
« Reply #93 on: December 01, 2009, 06:11:20 pm »
Ignore

AYE
Logged

Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29251
United States


View Profile
« Reply #94 on: December 01, 2009, 07:02:06 pm »
Ignore

NAY
Logged

He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again! Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!



RG Fritz
JLD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5440
United States


View Profile
« Reply #95 on: December 01, 2009, 07:16:07 pm »
Ignore

Aye
Logged

Rowan
RowanBrandon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6714


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

View Profile
« Reply #96 on: December 01, 2009, 07:48:53 pm »
Ignore

Nay
Logged
MaxQue
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8652
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #97 on: December 02, 2009, 02:24:20 am »
Ignore

Aye
Logged
Marokai Besieged
Marokai Blue
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16699
United States


View Profile
« Reply #98 on: December 02, 2009, 02:45:11 am »
Ignore

This bill is now passing. 24 hours to change votes.
Logged

tmthforu94
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18284
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #99 on: December 02, 2009, 09:11:07 am »
Ignore

Nay
Logged


"A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives."
-Jackie Robinson
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines