how would you have voted on this amendment?

[© tweed]

http://action.aclu.org/site/VoteCenter?page=voteInfo&voteId=9428


On June 4, 2009, the House passed an amendment offered by Representatives Chaffetz (R-UT) and Shea-Porter (D-NH) to the Transportation Security Administration Authorization Act (H.R. 2200) by a vote of 310-118. The Chaffetz-Shea-Porter Amendment prohibits the use of whole-body imaging technology, which produces graphic and detailed images of aircraft passengers' bodies, as the sole or primary method of screening. Rather, it permits such imaging only when metal detection or other methods of screening demonstrate cause. The ACLU supported this amendment because of the Fourth Amendment and other privacy protections it affords aircraft passengers.

[Scam of God]

Aye.

[k-onmmunist]

Aye.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Aye.

The perverts at the TSA must be quite unhappy.

[Phony Moderate]

Aye.

[Marokai Backbeat]

Aye.

[Hash]

Aye.

[Scam of God]

Who voted "Nay"?

[k-onmmunist]

It would appear this is an issue that transcends partisan boundaries.

[Kaine for Senate '18]

Nay.

[Scam of God]

Nay.

Why?

[Kaine for Senate '18]

Nay.

Why?

This can provide definitive answers that may not be afforded by metal detectors, and is, to me, no real violation of privacy.

[Scam of God]

Nay.

Why?

This can provide definitive answers that may not be afforded by metal detectors, and is, to me, no real violation of privacy.

I doubt very seriously that warrantless wiretapping is a real violation of privacy to you.

[Kaine for Senate '18]

I doubt very seriously that warrantless wiretapping is a real violation of privacy to you.

Of course it is.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Nay.

Why?

This can provide definitive answers that may not be afforded by metal detectors, and is, to me, no real violation of privacy.

Definitive answers? What are the questions? TSA idiots debating who has the biggest breasts? (Or 'package' for those TSAers who roll that way)