Yes, because you know, going from a 50-50 district in 2004 to a 56-43 district in 2008 certainly spells doom for the Democrats.
This is a D+2 district. The DCCC put some money here in 2008. The Democratic candidate spent a million dollars. Obama won the district in a "break Democratic" year.
And Charlie Dent still won by 17.
That's what spells doom for Democrats.
Though I'll be very interested in hearing where you think those 18 points of Democratic performance are going to come from!
Sam Bennett was a bad candidate, from what I remember. I never considered PA-15 to be vulnerable in 2008. You can pour as much money as you want into a race, but if your candidate sucks, you won't win regardless.