Republican Primary - Keystone Phil versus Alexander Hamilton
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 18, 2024, 09:38:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community
  Forum Community Election Match-ups (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Republican Primary - Keystone Phil versus Alexander Hamilton
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: Well who would you vote for and who would win?
#1
Keystone Phil/Keystone Phil
 
#2
Keystone Phil/Alexander Hamilton
 
#3
Alexander Hamilton/Keystone Phil
 
#4
Alexander Hamilton/Alexander Hamilton
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 25

Author Topic: Republican Primary - Keystone Phil versus Alexander Hamilton  (Read 4926 times)
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,368
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: December 23, 2009, 08:21:31 PM »

Hamilton
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: December 23, 2009, 08:42:12 PM »

Hamilton/Hamilton
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: December 23, 2009, 09:03:23 PM »

Hamilton/Phil
Logged
Vepres
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,032
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: December 23, 2009, 10:09:11 PM »

Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: December 23, 2009, 10:35:13 PM »



Alexander Hamilton
Keystone Phil
Logged
Mint
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,566
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: December 23, 2009, 11:04:09 PM »
« Edited: December 24, 2009, 01:22:57 AM by KRAMPUS™ »

Hamilton's people imply Phil is homosexual through robocalls, he wins the primaries and the election.
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,167
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: December 24, 2009, 01:16:49 AM »

Yankee, the South is irrelevant to winning the primary. Ask Huckabee.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: December 24, 2009, 02:01:03 PM »

Yankee, the South is irrelevant to winning the primary. Ask Huckabee.

Ask McCain who won South Carolina in 2008 and become the front runner, and who lost SC in 2000 and couldn't recover his momentum.
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: December 24, 2009, 02:04:06 PM »

Phil/Phil.

Hamilton, the base would never warm to you with your current politics. You would be Dead on Arrival.

Logged
Rob
Bob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,277
United States
Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -9.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: December 24, 2009, 02:14:54 PM »

Phil's a pimp. I dedicate this song to him.
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,167
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: December 24, 2009, 04:36:15 PM »

Yankee, the South is irrelevant to winning the primary. Ask Huckabee.

Ask McCain who won South Carolina in 2008 and become the front runner, and who lost SC in 2000 and couldn't recover his momentum.

I could win SC in an OPEN PRIMARY, dumbass.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: December 24, 2009, 04:37:58 PM »

Yankee, the South is irrelevant to winning the primary. Ask Huckabee.

Ask McCain who won South Carolina in 2008 and become the front runner, and who lost SC in 2000 and couldn't recover his momentum.

I could win SC in an OPEN PRIMARY, dumbass.

Yes, you fit perfectly: a guy who in few months claimed to be progressive, conservative or libertarian, when only needed to win a support.
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,167
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: December 24, 2009, 04:38:31 PM »

Yankee, the South is irrelevant to winning the primary. Ask Huckabee.

Ask McCain who won South Carolina in 2008 and become the front runner, and who lost SC in 2000 and couldn't recover his momentum.

I could win SC in an OPEN PRIMARY, dumbass.

Yes, you fit perfectly: a guy who in few months claimed to be progressive, conservative or libertarian, when only needed to win a support.

When did I claim to be a libertarian?

And progressivsm and conservatism are compatible.
Logged
Mint
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,566
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: December 24, 2009, 04:40:40 PM »

In the traditional sense of those terms yes. People are just ignorant.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: December 24, 2009, 07:04:35 PM »

In the traditional sense of those terms yes. People are just ignorant.

Remember we are talking about South Carolina Primary voters. Ignorant or not, it doesn't change the fact that shammy would need to win here and he wouldn't come close to doing so. Even McCain was a Military Veteran and had some things going for him which Hamilton has none of. He would lose the Evans and the Military vets. That leaves the Urban/surburban fiscally conservative social moderates(Duke type people), though growing they still can't command enough voting power to win a primary.


Yankee, the South is irrelevant to winning the primary. Ask Huckabee.

Ask McCain who won South Carolina in 2008 and become the front runner, and who lost SC in 2000 and couldn't recover his momentum.

I could win SC in an OPEN PRIMARY, dumbass.

Independents make up a small amount of the electorate. Far below 50% and I will gurrantee that a large portion of them are born again evangelicals and they would want nothing to do with you considering you are atheist and Phil is Roman Catholic. That would make all the difference.

Nice Try.
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,167
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: December 24, 2009, 07:14:51 PM »

I'm Catholic, idiot.
Logged
Psychic Octopus
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,948
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: December 24, 2009, 08:01:17 PM »


According to my guessing, you are a lapsed one and an atheist.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: December 24, 2009, 10:12:22 PM »
« Edited: December 24, 2009, 10:14:04 PM by Senator North Carolina Yankee, PPT »



Thats not what you told Straha when you were trying so hard not to get your head handed to you. lol
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: December 24, 2009, 11:32:59 PM »

In the traditional sense of those terms yes. People are just ignorant.

Remember we are talking about South Carolina Primary voters. Ignorant or not, it doesn't change the fact that shammy would need to win here and he wouldn't come close to doing so. Even McCain was a Military Veteran and had some things going for him which Hamilton has none of. He would lose the Evans and the Military vets. That leaves the Urban/surburban fiscally conservative social moderates(Duke type people), though growing they still can't command enough voting power to win a primary.


Yankee, the South is irrelevant to winning the primary. Ask Huckabee.

Ask McCain who won South Carolina in 2008 and become the front runner, and who lost SC in 2000 and couldn't recover his momentum.

I could win SC in an OPEN PRIMARY, dumbass.

Independents make up a small amount of the electorate. Far below 50% and I will gurrantee that a large portion of them are born again evangelicals and they would want nothing to do with you considering you are atheist and Phil is Roman Catholic. That would make all the difference.

Nice Try.

South Carolina was won in 2008 by John McCain, who was hardly the evangelicals' top choice for the nomination. An infinitely more appealing candidate like Alexander Hamilton could just as easily swing independent voters and even some Dems to deliver victory in SC.


And I'm at least one Catholic who would have no problem voting for Hamilton.
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,167
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: December 25, 2009, 12:10:55 AM »



Thats not what you told Straha when you were trying so hard not to get your head handed to you. lol

I'm a cultural Catholic and identify as one on all my official records.
Logged
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: December 25, 2009, 12:19:30 AM »

i'm a non-denominational, though strongly spiritual christian who'd vote for an Atheist if he shared my political convictions.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: December 25, 2009, 11:37:41 AM »

Calling yourself a progressive will get you NOWHERE in a Republican primary.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: December 25, 2009, 11:38:46 AM »

Calling yourself a progressive will get you NOWHERE in a Republican primary.
Open primaries + any primaries/caucuses in the Northeast/ West Coast would not have such a problem with that.
Logged
Alexander Hamilton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,167
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: December 25, 2009, 11:39:11 AM »

Calling yourself a progressive will get you NOWHERE in a Republican primary.

Against a gay? Most Repulicans would avoid the gay and vote for the progressive.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 14 queries.