Republican Primary - Keystone Phil versus Alexander Hamilton

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Post maps if you wish.

[Rowan]

Phil and it wouldn't even be close.

[Jayhawker]

Phil would easily win the Republican primary, based off politics, mainly.

[MasterJedi]

Phil/Phil, Hamilton wouldn't even come close.

[Alexander Hamilton]

I would pull it out in the end.

[Senator Kalwejt]

I would pull it out in the end.

Like Deeds?

[Alexander Hamilton]

Blue- Hamilton
Red- Phil

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Blue- Hamilton
Red- Phil

You wouldn't win Texas. There aren't enough Republican Hispanics to control the GOP Primary and the rest would all be Keystone's type of voter.

[Alexander Hamilton]

Blue- Hamilton
Red- Phil

You wouldn't win Texas. There aren't enough Republican Hispanics to control the GOP Primary and the rest would all be Keystone's type of voter.

Texas Republicans would support the anti-illegal immigrant candidate and the sane candidate. Though I think Texas would be close, nothing west of it would even be contested by Phil.

[Jayhawker]

Trying to follow primary schedule...

[Senator Kalwejt]

Keystone would have an appeal to the GOP base unlike a dude, who during last months was once a progressive, a conservative, a libertarian... take your pick.

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Also you wouldn't win Utah, Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, the plains states, Minnestota has a caucus system that would make it easy for a conservative win see Romney winning it in 2008. Wisconsin would vote the same as MN and MI. The GOP state parties in both Washington and Arizona are hella Conservative. You would not win North Carolina, or any other outer or inner Souther State except Florida, and you might get close in VA.

[Alexander Hamilton]

Also you wouldn't win Utah, Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, the plains states, Minnestota has a caucus system that would make it easy for a conservative win see Romney winning it in 2008. Wisconsin would vote the same as MN and MI. The GOP state parties in both Washington and Arizona are hella Conservative. You would not win North Carolina, or any other outer or inner Souther State except Florida, and you might get close in VA.

If Pat McCrory could get nominated by the NC GOP, I'm sure I could. The NC GOP is getting less conservative. A lot of the conservatives are actually registered Democrats there.

I would easily win Idaho and Utah and Wyoming and Montana. Not as sure on the Dakotas.

WA and AZ are already in the bag for me, and I would win Minnesota fairly easily as well.

Phil would only win in the radical and racist states mostly located in the Deep South. He would certainly win the populist vote, but I would win among urban and suburban Republicans, middle class, upper-middle class, and wealthy Republicans, business owners, as well as rural libertarian-esque Republicans in the Midwest. I would easily raise more money, I would easily win the votes from moderates and libertarian Republicans, and Independents in states like New Hampshire. My campaign's organization would be stronger, allowing me to do better in caucues (the real reason Romney won, not his "conservatism").

[RIP Robert H Bork]

Also you wouldn't win Utah, Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, the plains states, Minnestota has a caucus system that would make it easy for a conservative win see Romney winning it in 2008. Wisconsin would vote the same as MN and MI. The GOP state parties in both Washington and Arizona are hella Conservative. You would not win North Carolina, or any other outer or inner Souther State except Florida, and you might get close in VA.

Romney is no conservative.

[Alexander Hamilton]

Also you wouldn't win Utah, Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, the plains states, Minnestota has a caucus system that would make it easy for a conservative win see Romney winning it in 2008. Wisconsin would vote the same as MN and MI. The GOP state parties in both Washington and Arizona are hella Conservative. You would not win North Carolina, or any other outer or inner Souther State except Florida, and you might get close in VA.

Romney is no conservative.

You're no conservative.

[RIP Robert H Bork]

Also you wouldn't win Utah, Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, the plains states, Minnestota has a caucus system that would make it easy for a conservative win see Romney winning it in 2008. Wisconsin would vote the same as MN and MI. The GOP state parties in both Washington and Arizona are hella Conservative. You would not win North Carolina, or any other outer or inner Souther State except Florida, and you might get close in VA.

Romney is no conservative.

You're no conservative.

How so?

[Alexander Hamilton]

Also you wouldn't win Utah, Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, the plains states, Minnestota has a caucus system that would make it easy for a conservative win see Romney winning it in 2008. Wisconsin would vote the same as MN and MI. The GOP state parties in both Washington and Arizona are hella Conservative. You would not win North Carolina, or any other outer or inner Souther State except Florida, and you might get close in VA.

Romney is no conservative.

You're no conservative.

How so?

You love war and intervention.

Bob Taft turns in his grave due to your display name.

[RIP Robert H Bork]

Also you wouldn't win Utah, Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, the plains states, Minnestota has a caucus system that would make it easy for a conservative win see Romney winning it in 2008. Wisconsin would vote the same as MN and MI. The GOP state parties in both Washington and Arizona are hella Conservative. You would not win North Carolina, or any other outer or inner Souther State except Florida, and you might get close in VA.

Romney is no conservative.

You're no conservative.

How so?

You love war and intervention.

Bob Taft turns in his grave due to your display name.

*facepalm*

Nobody "loves war".

Returning to my original point, I'm not aware that Romney is an isolationist. It wouldn't surprise me if he were one, but that would not make him a conservative. Further, conservatism != isolationism.

[Alexander Hamilton]

Also you wouldn't win Utah, Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, the plains states, Minnestota has a caucus system that would make it easy for a conservative win see Romney winning it in 2008. Wisconsin would vote the same as MN and MI. The GOP state parties in both Washington and Arizona are hella Conservative. You would not win North Carolina, or any other outer or inner Souther State except Florida, and you might get close in VA.

Romney is no conservative.

You're no conservative.

How so?

You love war and intervention.

Bob Taft turns in his grave due to your display name.

*facepalm*

Nobody "loves war".

Returning to my original point, I'm not aware that Romney is an isolationist. It wouldn't surprise me if he were one, but that would not make him a conservative. Further, conservatism != isolationism.

Incorrect. Isolationism is a pillar of conservative thought.

[RIP Robert H Bork]

Also you wouldn't win Utah, Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, the plains states, Minnestota has a caucus system that would make it easy for a conservative win see Romney winning it in 2008. Wisconsin would vote the same as MN and MI. The GOP state parties in both Washington and Arizona are hella Conservative. You would not win North Carolina, or any other outer or inner Souther State except Florida, and you might get close in VA.

Romney is no conservative.

You're no conservative.

How so?

You love war and intervention.

Bob Taft turns in his grave due to your display name.

*facepalm*

Nobody "loves war".

Returning to my original point, I'm not aware that Romney is an isolationist. It wouldn't surprise me if he were one, but that would not make him a conservative. Further, conservatism != isolationism.

Incorrect. Isolationism is a pillar of conservative thought.

No, and even assuming for now that it is, that hardly makes Romney a conservative overall. In other words, conservatism still is not the same thing as isolationism; isolationism is at best only a part of conservative thought.

[Alexander Hamilton]

Also you wouldn't win Utah, Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, the plains states, Minnestota has a caucus system that would make it easy for a conservative win see Romney winning it in 2008. Wisconsin would vote the same as MN and MI. The GOP state parties in both Washington and Arizona are hella Conservative. You would not win North Carolina, or any other outer or inner Souther State except Florida, and you might get close in VA.

Romney is no conservative.

You're no conservative.

How so?

You love war and intervention.

Bob Taft turns in his grave due to your display name.

*facepalm*

Nobody "loves war".

Returning to my original point, I'm not aware that Romney is an isolationist. It wouldn't surprise me if he were one, but that would not make him a conservative. Further, conservatism != isolationism.

Incorrect. Isolationism is a pillar of conservative thought.

No, and even assuming for now that it is, that hardly makes Romney a conservative overall.

Who cares whether Romney is a cosnervative?

I would crush Phil in a primary battle.

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Hamilton trying to wear his faux coat of Libertarianism has now made him a less effective spokesman for Romney.

[Alexander Hamilton]

Hamilton trying to wear his faux coat of Libertarianism has now made him a less effective spokesman for Romney.

When have I ever claimed to be a libertarian? Not once have I associated myself with such an ideology.

[Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Also you wouldn't win Utah, Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, the plains states, Minnestota has a caucus system that would make it easy for a conservative win see Romney winning it in 2008. Wisconsin would vote the same as MN and MI. The GOP state parties in both Washington and Arizona are hella Conservative. You would not win North Carolina, or any other outer or inner Souther State except Florida, and you might get close in VA.

Romney is no conservative.

You're no conservative.

How so?

You love war and intervention.

Bob Taft turns in his grave due to your display name.

*facepalm*

Nobody "loves war".

Returning to my original point, I'm not aware that Romney is an isolationist. It wouldn't surprise me if he were one, but that would not make him a conservative. Further, conservatism != isolationism.

Incorrect. Isolationism is a pillar of conservative thought.

No, and even assuming for now that it is, that hardly makes Romney a conservative overall.

Who cares whether Romney is a cosnervative?

I would crush Phil in a primary battle.

lol. In a party dominated by Southerners which you have stated are ignorant and stupid, you think you would do well enough to get close.

ROTFLOL.


Admit it, Phil would wipe your ass of the floor.

Hamilton trying to wear his faux coat of Libertarianism has now made him a less effective spokesman for Romney.

When have I ever claimed to be a libertarian? Not once have I associated myself with such an ideology.

I never associated myself with any particular ideology except conservatism in its most general forms yet that doesn't stop you from calling me a populist unfairly.

[MasterJedi]

I would pull it out in the end.

That's what she said.