Home 2012 Election Results Election Info Weblog Wiki Search Email Site Info Store

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 19, 2013, 03:25:39 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2010 Elections (Moderator: Joe Republic)
| | |-+  PPP Poll Choice This Week		 « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Author Topic: PPP Poll Choice This Week  (Read 3009 times)
Senator Ben
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29900
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: 2.61

View Profile
« Reply #25 on: January 02, 2010, 04:35:53 pm »
Ignore
Uh uh, yeah, we'll see.  No closer than 56-44.
Logged
Quote from: The Mikado on March 18, 2011, 11:12:39 pm
Obama High's debate team:

"Now let me be clear...I...I...um...uh...now let me be clear.  I strongly condemn the affirmative in the strongest possible terms, and I am closely monitoring their arguments.  Let me be clear on this."
Big DaddyTX
AndrewCT
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6855


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: January 02, 2010, 05:04:24 pm »
Ignore
Quote from: Mideast Assemblyman Ben on January 02, 2010, 04:35:53 pm
Uh uh, yeah, we'll see.  No closer than 56-44.


I agree, the race will be close, and thats by MA standards. For everyone else, it will be a close and easy win for the dems.
Logged
Quote from: Obama lean Bushie on August 28, 2012, 12:27:23 pm
Stop trying to get me on small technicalities.
Quote from: I'm gonna sink your battleship!! on October 30, 2012, 07:23:57 pm
My parents are pretty good about smelling a rat. 
JohnnyLongtorso
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6854


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: January 02, 2010, 06:01:35 pm »
Ignore
Quote from: redcommander on January 02, 2010, 04:23:53 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California's_10th_congressional_district_special_election,_2009

Perfect example of Dems thinking Garamendi would win in a landslide and didn't.



Who was predicting that, exactly? Everyone who entered a prediction in this thread put Garamendi in the mid-50s, and he won 53%, so they were off by a couple points. Put down the Kool-aid, buddy.
Logged
A-Bob
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5888
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 1.13

View Profile
« Reply #28 on: January 02, 2010, 06:35:24 pm »
Ignore
Voted MA, but I'd be fine to see Connecticut polling too
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3844
View Profile
« Reply #29 on: January 02, 2010, 07:18:07 pm »
Ignore
Quote from: JohnnyLongtorso on January 02, 2010, 06:01:35 pm
Quote from: redcommander on January 02, 2010, 04:23:53 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California's_10th_congressional_district_special_election,_2009

Perfect example of Dems thinking Garamendi would win in a landslide and didn't.



Who was predicting that, exactly? Everyone who entered a prediction in this thread put Garamendi in the mid-50s, and he won 53%, so they were off by a couple points. Put down the Kool-aid, buddy.

I meant the Democratic Party. Obviously people in this forum are more politically savy than many in the RNC or DNC, and I am saying that many in the Democratic Party didn't even think it would be a close race and it turned out to be. Coakley is basically already in victory mode, because she and the party leadership think she has it in the bag while Brown is reaching out online, using money bombs, and grassroots campaining.
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6854


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: January 02, 2010, 07:38:22 pm »
Ignore
Oh, I just figured out what happened with the poll -- the Paulites got to it, since the Ayn Rand acolyte Peter Schiff is running.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6701


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

View Profile
« Reply #31 on: January 02, 2010, 09:48:16 pm »
Ignore
Massachusetts is now back within 8. The Paulbots must have passed out from all of that voting.
Logged
Senator Ben
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29900
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: 2.61

View Profile
« Reply #32 on: January 02, 2010, 10:24:17 pm »
Ignore
Massachusetts has the lead!
Logged
Quote from: The Mikado on March 18, 2011, 11:12:39 pm
Obama High's debate team:

"Now let me be clear...I...I...um...uh...now let me be clear.  I strongly condemn the affirmative in the strongest possible terms, and I am closely monitoring their arguments.  Let me be clear on this."
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 28265
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -5.39

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #33 on: January 03, 2010, 12:58:51 am »
Ignore
Quote from: Mideast Assemblyman Ben on January 02, 2010, 10:24:17 pm
Massachusetts has the lead!

Fantastic news ! Smiley
Logged
Jbrase
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5112
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.32, S: -6.09

View Profile
« Reply #34 on: January 03, 2010, 03:48:00 pm »
Ignore
Connecticut is leading again
Logged
Fmr. Emperor PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21575
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: -4.35

View Profile
« Reply #35 on: January 03, 2010, 03:58:08 pm »
Ignore
     I voted for Connecticut. Smiley
Logged
Farewell to a legend:



r(x,y) != <-y,x>

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=103836.0
ex-Senator X
jdb
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6138
United States


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: January 03, 2010, 06:40:22 pm »
Ignore
Quote from: PiT (The Physicist) on January 03, 2010, 03:58:08 pm
     I voted for Connecticut. Smiley

Just canceled out your vote, Massachusetts must be polled (if for no other reason than to shut up all the Republicans who have been saying its a close race).
Logged
Cool Grin Tongue Smiley Sad Huh Angry Wink Roll Eyes Undecided Cheesy
Shocked Lips sealed

Fmr. Emperor PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21575
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.35, S: -4.35

View Profile
« Reply #37 on: January 03, 2010, 06:45:17 pm »
Ignore
Quote from: xyz on January 03, 2010, 06:40:22 pm
Quote from: PiT (The Physicist) on January 03, 2010, 03:58:08 pm
     I voted for Connecticut. Smiley

Just canceled out your vote, Massachusetts must be polled (if for no other reason than to shut up all the Republicans who have been saying its a close race).

     Is it that important, though? I just ignore them.
Logged
Farewell to a legend:



r(x,y) != <-y,x>

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=103836.0
Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21445
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: 3.22

View Profile
« Reply #38 on: January 03, 2010, 06:55:39 pm »
Ignore
Massachusetts simply because its only two weeks away.
Logged
He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again! Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!
Rowan
RowanBrandon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6701


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

View Profile
« Reply #39 on: January 03, 2010, 07:26:07 pm »
Ignore
We've already had plenty of polls on CT. We have had ZERO on Massachusetts(yes I know there was a Suffolk one before the primary, but I mean legitimate polls).
Logged
Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21445
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: 3.22

View Profile
« Reply #40 on: January 03, 2010, 07:38:50 pm »
Ignore
You want CT, I will give you the CT result. Dodd sucks, Simmons is the strongest opponent, and Simmons leads in the primary. The End.


Now lets have a Massachusetts poll already. Roll Eyes
Logged
He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again! Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!
Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory