"Opnion of" threads

[Joe Republic]

He's not bad poster - just need to realize he's posting extremely too much.

Which makes him a spammer.

No, spam is generally non-substantive, or at least non-contributive in some way.

[Joe Republic]

It's spam and annoying, but no reason he should be banned before Hamilton or J. J.

No, as we apparently keep needing to reiterate, it's flooding.  Very different from spam.

He's no more guilty of spamming the forum than you, Mr. 47,831.

[Joe Republic]

It's spam and annoying, but no reason he should be banned before Hamilton or J. J.

No, as we apparently keep needing to reiterate, it's flooding.  Very different from spam.

He's no more guilty of spamming the forum than you, Mr. 47,831.

I have 21.743 posts per day. Rochambeau has over 100.

Even so, you pollute the forum with incessant polls about whatever garbage just blocked itself in your stream of consciousness at that moment.  Rochambeau's incessant polls at least have some kind of politically relevant theme.