Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 20, 2013, 01:24:41 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Election What-ifs?
| | |-+  International What-ifs (Moderator: Bacon King)
| | | |-+  How would you have voted? UK
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Print
Author Topic: How would you have voted? UK  (Read 9785 times)
dialectical fetishist
Winston Disraeli
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12157
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


View Profile
« on: January 15, 2010, 06:59:56 am »
Ignore

Reviving this one with a new thread rather than bumping the old one.

1832: Whig
1835: Conservative
1837: Conservative
1841: Conservative
1847: Chartist
1852: Chartist
1857: Whig
1859: Whig
1865: Liberal
1868: Liberal
1874: Liberal
1880: Liberal
1885: Liberal
1886: Liberal
1892: Liberal
1895: Liberal
1900: Liberal
1906: Conservative
1910 (Jan): Labour
1910 (Dec): Labour
1918: Co-operative
1922: Labour
1923: Labour
1924: Labour
1929: Liberal
1931: Labour
1935: Conservative
1945: Common Wealth
1950: Conservative
1951: Conservative
1955: Labour
1959: Labour
1964: Labour
1966: Labour
1970: Labour
1974 (Feb): Labour
1974 (Oct): Labour
1979: Liberal
1983: Conservative
1987: Labour
1992: Labour
1997: Referendum
2001: Green
2005: Green
2010: Labour
Logged

Formerly Californian Tony
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 25190
France


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -4.87

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2010, 12:48:26 pm »
Ignore

1929-2005 Labour. Liberal before
2010 probably Liberal as a protest
Logged



Thank you so much, USF.



"A good portion of this country has created an alternate universe. I call this place were these folks live Bullsh*t Mountain. The denizens of Bullsh*t Mountain believe many things: they believe that a Kenyan Muslim President has fundamentally changed the relationship between government and the people of this country."

Jon Stewart
dialectical fetishist
Winston Disraeli
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12157
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2010, 06:57:39 pm »
Ignore

1929-2005 Labour. Liberal before
2010 probably Liberal as a protest

Woah, no. You don't want to do that. You vote Liberal and you're helping Slimeball Cameron.
Logged

N.i.K.
Psychic Octopus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9223
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: 0.70

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2010, 07:03:47 pm »
Ignore

Ewww.... How can you vote for Labour, Winston?
Logged

dialectical fetishist
Winston Disraeli
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12157
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2010, 07:06:14 pm »
Ignore

Ewww.... How can you vote for Labour, Winston?

Lesser of two evils.
Logged

N.i.K.
Psychic Octopus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9223
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: 0.70

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 15, 2010, 07:07:40 pm »
Ignore

Ewww.... How can you vote for Labour, Winston?

Lesser of two evils.

But they're both pretty evil, right?
Logged

Kuu ülevaade olulisematest
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 37014
Bangladesh


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 15, 2010, 11:27:47 pm »
Ignore

Ewww.... How can you vote for Labour, Winston?

Why not?
Logged

I'm not sure if this new tendency to appeal to the apparent inherent evil of Xahar in all things even remotely related to forum policing or this damn game is especially helpful.
N.i.K.
Psychic Octopus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9223
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: 0.70

View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 16, 2010, 01:34:06 am »
Ignore

Ewww.... How can you vote for Labour, Winston?

Why not?

In 2010? UK Libertarians are a better option for someone of his ideals, in my opinion. But, it's his choice.
Logged

Kuu ülevaade olulisematest
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 37014
Bangladesh


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: January 16, 2010, 02:03:42 am »
Ignore

Ewww.... How can you vote for Labour, Winston?

Why not?

In 2010? UK Libertarians are a better option for someone of his ideals, in my opinion. But, it's his choice.

Libertarians=joke party
Logged

I'm not sure if this new tendency to appeal to the apparent inherent evil of Xahar in all things even remotely related to forum policing or this damn game is especially helpful.
N.i.K.
Psychic Octopus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9223
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: 0.70

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: January 16, 2010, 02:13:42 am »
Ignore

Ewww.... How can you vote for Labour, Winston?

Why not?

In 2010? UK Libertarians are a better option for someone of his ideals, in my opinion. But, it's his choice.

Libertarians=joke party

Eh, yes, but I just don't think Labour is a good option for the country in 2010. I'd rather see the Lib Dems take over the spirit of progressivism in the country, reducing Labour to a third party.
Logged

Kuu ülevaade olulisematest
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 37014
Bangladesh


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: January 16, 2010, 02:37:21 am »
Ignore

Ewww.... How can you vote for Labour, Winston?

Why not?

In 2010? UK Libertarians are a better option for someone of his ideals, in my opinion. But, it's his choice.

Libertarians=joke party

Eh, yes, but I just don't think Labour is a good option for the country in 2010. I'd rather see the Lib Dems take over the spirit of progressivism in the country, reducing Labour to a third party.

wtf?
Logged

I'm not sure if this new tendency to appeal to the apparent inherent evil of Xahar in all things even remotely related to forum policing or this damn game is especially helpful.
N.i.K.
Psychic Octopus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9223
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: 0.70

View Profile
« Reply #11 on: January 16, 2010, 02:40:14 am »
Ignore

Ewww.... How can you vote for Labour, Winston?

Why not?

In 2010? UK Libertarians are a better option for someone of his ideals, in my opinion. But, it's his choice.

Libertarians=joke party

Eh, yes, but I just don't think Labour is a good option for the country in 2010. I'd rather see the Lib Dems take over the spirit of progressivism in the country, reducing Labour to a third party.

wtf?

?
Logged

Formerly Californian Tony
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 25190
France


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -4.87

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: January 16, 2010, 06:26:48 am »
Ignore

1929-2005 Labour. Liberal before
2010 probably Liberal as a protest

Woah, no. You don't want to do that. You vote Liberal and you're helping Slimeball Cameron.

True. 2010 would be a really tough year for me...
Logged



Thank you so much, USF.



"A good portion of this country has created an alternate universe. I call this place were these folks live Bullsh*t Mountain. The denizens of Bullsh*t Mountain believe many things: they believe that a Kenyan Muslim President has fundamentally changed the relationship between government and the people of this country."

Jon Stewart
PASOK Leader Hashemite
Hashemite
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30341
South Africa


View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: January 16, 2010, 09:06:07 am »
Ignore

2010 probably Liberal as a protest

Beware! The Liberals are a Eurosceptic fringe party, the LibDems are those you're talking about Smiley

I already answered this question. Where's the old thread?
Logged





Vote Xahar/Hashemite
For Mustafinism-Komovism
Against Misogyny
dialectical fetishist
Winston Disraeli
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12157
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: January 16, 2010, 09:53:17 am »
Ignore

Would have been registered as:

Whig/Liberal: 1832-1906
Labour: 1906-1997
Green: 1997-
Logged

You kip if you want to...
change08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8085
United Kingdom


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: January 16, 2010, 10:24:30 am »
Ignore

1900: Labour
1906: Labour
1910 (Jan): Liberal
1910 (Dec): Liberal
1918: Liberal
1922: Liberal
1923: Labour
1924: Labour
1929: Labour
1931: Abstain
1935: Labour
1945: Labour
1950: Labour
1951: Labour
1955: Labour
1959: Labour
1964: Labour
1966: Labour
1970: Labour
1974 (Feb): Labour
1974 (Oct): Labour
1979: Labour
1983: SDP-Liberal Alliance
1987: Labour
1992: Labour
1997: Labour
2001: Labour
2005: Labour
2010: Labour
Logged


Kuu ülevaade olulisematest
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 37014
Bangladesh


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: January 17, 2010, 03:19:54 am »
Ignore

1929-2005 Labour. Liberal before
2010 probably Liberal as a protest

Woah, no. You don't want to do that. You vote Liberal and you're helping Slimeball Cameron.

True. 2010 would be a really tough year for me...

Why?
Logged

I'm not sure if this new tendency to appeal to the apparent inherent evil of Xahar in all things even remotely related to forum policing or this damn game is especially helpful.
Formerly Californian Tony
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 25190
France


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -4.87

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #17 on: January 17, 2010, 03:47:16 am »
Ignore

1929-2005 Labour. Liberal before
2010 probably Liberal as a protest

Woah, no. You don't want to do that. You vote Liberal and you're helping Slimeball Cameron.

True. 2010 would be a really tough year for me...

Why?

Is it so hard to understand ? Conservatives are awful, labour government is being an epic fail, libs have no chance to get in power.
Logged



Thank you so much, USF.



"A good portion of this country has created an alternate universe. I call this place were these folks live Bullsh*t Mountain. The denizens of Bullsh*t Mountain believe many things: they believe that a Kenyan Muslim President has fundamentally changed the relationship between government and the people of this country."

Jon Stewart
Kuu ülevaade olulisematest
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 37014
Bangladesh


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: January 17, 2010, 05:46:53 am »
Ignore

1929-2005 Labour. Liberal before
2010 probably Liberal as a protest

Woah, no. You don't want to do that. You vote Liberal and you're helping Slimeball Cameron.

True. 2010 would be a really tough year for me...

Why?

Is it so hard to understand ? Conservatives are awful, labour government is being an epic fail, libs have no chance to get in power.

I see no reason not to support Labour.
Logged

I'm not sure if this new tendency to appeal to the apparent inherent evil of Xahar in all things even remotely related to forum policing or this damn game is especially helpful.
Formerly Californian Tony
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 25190
France


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -4.87

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #19 on: January 17, 2010, 06:15:01 am »
Ignore

1929-2005 Labour. Liberal before
2010 probably Liberal as a protest

Woah, no. You don't want to do that. You vote Liberal and you're helping Slimeball Cameron.

True. 2010 would be a really tough year for me...

Why?

Is it so hard to understand ? Conservatives are awful, labour government is being an epic fail, libs have no chance to get in power.

I see no reason not to support Labour.

Brown's term wasn't exactly a success. But anyways yes, I guess I'd vote labour actually.
Logged



Thank you so much, USF.



"A good portion of this country has created an alternate universe. I call this place were these folks live Bullsh*t Mountain. The denizens of Bullsh*t Mountain believe many things: they believe that a Kenyan Muslim President has fundamentally changed the relationship between government and the people of this country."

Jon Stewart
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 53153
Saint Helena


View Profile WWW
« Reply #20 on: January 17, 2010, 12:41:52 pm »
Ignore

If I'm remembering the absurdly complicated rules on the franchise between the Second and Third Reform Acts and universal male suffrage, then I wouldn't have been able to vote until 1918. Labour in all elections since (and including) then because I am a very boring person.
Logged

Senator Ben
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29902
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: 2.61

View Profile
« Reply #21 on: February 09, 2010, 11:52:33 pm »
Ignore

1832: Whig
1835: Whig
1837: Conservative
1841: Chartist
1847: Chartist
1852: Chartist
1857: Chartist
1859: Chartist
1865: Conservative
1868: Conservative
1874: Conservative
1880: Conservative
1885: Conservative
1886: Conservative
1892: Independent Labour Party
1895: Independent Labour Party
1900: Labour
1906: Labour
1910 (January): Labour
1910 (December): Labour
1918: Labour
1922: Labour
1923: Labour
1924: Labour
1929: Labour
1931: Labour
1935: Labour
1945: Conservative (personal vote for Churchill)
1950: Conservative (personal vote for Churchill)
1951: Conservative (personal vote for Churchill)
1955: Labour
1959: Labour
1964: Labour
1966: Labour
1970: Labour
1974 (February): Labour
1974 (October): Labour
1979: Liberal
1983: Labour
1987: Labour
1992: Labour
1997: Labour
2001: Labour
2005: Labour
Logged

Obama High's debate team:

"Now let me be clear...I...I...um...uh...now let me be clear.  I strongly condemn the affirmative in the strongest possible terms, and I am closely monitoring their arguments.  Let me be clear on this."
Kuu ülevaade olulisematest
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 37014
Bangladesh


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: February 11, 2010, 04:15:32 am »
Ignore

1945: Conservative (personal vote for Churchill)
1950: Conservative (personal vote for Churchill)
1951: Conservative (personal vote for Churchill)

Yuck.
Logged

I'm not sure if this new tendency to appeal to the apparent inherent evil of Xahar in all things even remotely related to forum policing or this damn game is especially helpful.
dialectical fetishist
Winston Disraeli
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12157
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: February 11, 2010, 04:34:44 am »
Ignore

1983: Labour

Srsly?
Logged

Senator Ben
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29902
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: 2.61

View Profile
« Reply #24 on: February 11, 2010, 10:58:41 am »
Ignore

1945: Conservative (personal vote for Churchill)
1950: Conservative (personal vote for Churchill)
1951: Conservative (personal vote for Churchill)

Yuck.

Yep Tongue


I don't really see any better alternative.
Logged

Obama High's debate team:

"Now let me be clear...I...I...um...uh...now let me be clear.  I strongly condemn the affirmative in the strongest possible terms, and I am closely monitoring their arguments.  Let me be clear on this."
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory