Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
February 12, 2016, 03:31:31 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Election 2016 predictions are now open!.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Election What-ifs?
| | |-+  International What-ifs (Moderator: Apocrypha)
| | | |-+  How would you have voted? UK
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 Print
Author Topic: How would you have voted? UK  (Read 25504 times)
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11966
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


View Profile
« on: January 15, 2010, 06:59:56 am »
Ignore

Reviving this one with a new thread rather than bumping the old one.

1832: Whig
1835: Conservative
1837: Conservative
1841: Conservative
1847: Chartist
1852: Chartist
1857: Whig
1859: Whig
1865: Liberal
1868: Liberal
1874: Liberal
1880: Liberal
1885: Liberal
1886: Liberal
1892: Liberal
1895: Liberal
1900: Liberal
1906: Conservative
1910 (Jan): Labour
1910 (Dec): Labour
1918: Co-operative
1922: Labour
1923: Labour
1924: Labour
1929: Liberal
1931: Labour
1935: Conservative
1945: Common Wealth
1950: Conservative
1951: Conservative
1955: Labour
1959: Labour
1964: Labour
1966: Labour
1970: Labour
1974 (Feb): Labour
1974 (Oct): Labour
1979: Liberal
1983: Conservative
1987: Labour
1992: Labour
1997: Referendum
2001: Green
2005: Green
2010: Labour
Logged
Californian Tony Returns
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36198
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -4.87


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2010, 12:48:26 pm »
Ignore

1929-2005 Labour. Liberal before
2010 probably Liberal as a protest
Logged


"Never before in all our history have these forces [of organized money] been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me—and I welcome their hatred."

-- Franklin D. Roosevelt
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11966
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2010, 06:57:39 pm »
Ignore

1929-2005 Labour. Liberal before
2010 probably Liberal as a protest

Woah, no. You don't want to do that. You vote Liberal and you're helping Slimeball Cameron.
Logged
Psychic Octopus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9076
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2010, 07:03:47 pm »
Ignore

Ewww.... How can you vote for Labour, Winston?
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11966
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2010, 07:06:14 pm »
Ignore

Ewww.... How can you vote for Labour, Winston?

Lesser of two evils.
Logged
Psychic Octopus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9076
United States


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 15, 2010, 07:07:40 pm »
Ignore

Ewww.... How can you vote for Labour, Winston?

Lesser of two evils.

But they're both pretty evil, right?
Logged
Хahar
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39171
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: 0.43


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 15, 2010, 11:27:47 pm »
Ignore

Ewww.... How can you vote for Labour, Winston?

Why not?
Logged

Update reading list

The idea of parodying the preceding Atlasian's postings is laughable, of course, but not for reasons one might expect.
Psychic Octopus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9076
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 16, 2010, 01:34:06 am »
Ignore

Ewww.... How can you vote for Labour, Winston?

Why not?

In 2010? UK Libertarians are a better option for someone of his ideals, in my opinion. But, it's his choice.
Logged
Хahar
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39171
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: 0.43


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: January 16, 2010, 02:03:42 am »
Ignore

Ewww.... How can you vote for Labour, Winston?

Why not?

In 2010? UK Libertarians are a better option for someone of his ideals, in my opinion. But, it's his choice.

Libertarians=joke party
Logged

Update reading list

The idea of parodying the preceding Atlasian's postings is laughable, of course, but not for reasons one might expect.
Psychic Octopus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9076
United States


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: January 16, 2010, 02:13:42 am »
Ignore

Ewww.... How can you vote for Labour, Winston?

Why not?

In 2010? UK Libertarians are a better option for someone of his ideals, in my opinion. But, it's his choice.

Libertarians=joke party

Eh, yes, but I just don't think Labour is a good option for the country in 2010. I'd rather see the Lib Dems take over the spirit of progressivism in the country, reducing Labour to a third party.
Logged
Хahar
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39171
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: 0.43


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: January 16, 2010, 02:37:21 am »
Ignore

Ewww.... How can you vote for Labour, Winston?

Why not?

In 2010? UK Libertarians are a better option for someone of his ideals, in my opinion. But, it's his choice.

Libertarians=joke party

Eh, yes, but I just don't think Labour is a good option for the country in 2010. I'd rather see the Lib Dems take over the spirit of progressivism in the country, reducing Labour to a third party.

wtf?
Logged

Update reading list

The idea of parodying the preceding Atlasian's postings is laughable, of course, but not for reasons one might expect.
Psychic Octopus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9076
United States


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: January 16, 2010, 02:40:14 am »
Ignore

Ewww.... How can you vote for Labour, Winston?

Why not?

In 2010? UK Libertarians are a better option for someone of his ideals, in my opinion. But, it's his choice.

Libertarians=joke party

Eh, yes, but I just don't think Labour is a good option for the country in 2010. I'd rather see the Lib Dems take over the spirit of progressivism in the country, reducing Labour to a third party.

wtf?

?
Logged
Californian Tony Returns
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36198
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -4.87


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: January 16, 2010, 06:26:48 am »
Ignore

1929-2005 Labour. Liberal before
2010 probably Liberal as a protest

Woah, no. You don't want to do that. You vote Liberal and you're helping Slimeball Cameron.

True. 2010 would be a really tough year for me...
Logged


"Never before in all our history have these forces [of organized money] been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me—and I welcome their hatred."

-- Franklin D. Roosevelt
Hash
Hashemite
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31776
Mexico


View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: January 16, 2010, 09:06:07 am »
Ignore

2010 probably Liberal as a protest

Beware! The Liberals are a Eurosceptic fringe party, the LibDems are those you're talking about Smiley

I already answered this question. Where's the old thread?
Logged



17:40   oakvale   the people are bad and shouldn't be allowed vote whenever possible
17:40   oakvale   The average voter wants to end austerity, bring back hanging and put all immigrants in death
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11966
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: January 16, 2010, 09:53:17 am »
Ignore

Would have been registered as:

Whig/Liberal: 1832-1906
Labour: 1906-1997
Green: 1997-
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9021
United Kingdom


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: January 16, 2010, 10:24:30 am »
Ignore

1900: Labour
1906: Labour
1910 (Jan): Liberal
1910 (Dec): Liberal
1918: Liberal
1922: Liberal
1923: Labour
1924: Labour
1929: Labour
1931: Abstain
1935: Labour
1945: Labour
1950: Labour
1951: Labour
1955: Labour
1959: Labour
1964: Labour
1966: Labour
1970: Labour
1974 (Feb): Labour
1974 (Oct): Labour
1979: Labour
1983: SDP-Liberal Alliance
1987: Labour
1992: Labour
1997: Labour
2001: Labour
2005: Labour
2010: Labour
Logged

Хahar
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39171
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: 0.43


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: January 17, 2010, 03:19:54 am »
Ignore

1929-2005 Labour. Liberal before
2010 probably Liberal as a protest

Woah, no. You don't want to do that. You vote Liberal and you're helping Slimeball Cameron.

True. 2010 would be a really tough year for me...

Why?
Logged

Update reading list

The idea of parodying the preceding Atlasian's postings is laughable, of course, but not for reasons one might expect.
Californian Tony Returns
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36198
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -4.87


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: January 17, 2010, 03:47:16 am »
Ignore

1929-2005 Labour. Liberal before
2010 probably Liberal as a protest

Woah, no. You don't want to do that. You vote Liberal and you're helping Slimeball Cameron.

True. 2010 would be a really tough year for me...

Why?

Is it so hard to understand ? Conservatives are awful, labour government is being an epic fail, libs have no chance to get in power.
Logged


"Never before in all our history have these forces [of organized money] been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me—and I welcome their hatred."

-- Franklin D. Roosevelt
Хahar
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39171
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: 0.43


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: January 17, 2010, 05:46:53 am »
Ignore

1929-2005 Labour. Liberal before
2010 probably Liberal as a protest

Woah, no. You don't want to do that. You vote Liberal and you're helping Slimeball Cameron.

True. 2010 would be a really tough year for me...

Why?

Is it so hard to understand ? Conservatives are awful, labour government is being an epic fail, libs have no chance to get in power.

I see no reason not to support Labour.
Logged

Update reading list

The idea of parodying the preceding Atlasian's postings is laughable, of course, but not for reasons one might expect.
Californian Tony Returns
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36198
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -4.87


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: January 17, 2010, 06:15:01 am »
Ignore

1929-2005 Labour. Liberal before
2010 probably Liberal as a protest

Woah, no. You don't want to do that. You vote Liberal and you're helping Slimeball Cameron.

True. 2010 would be a really tough year for me...

Why?

Is it so hard to understand ? Conservatives are awful, labour government is being an epic fail, libs have no chance to get in power.

I see no reason not to support Labour.

Brown's term wasn't exactly a success. But anyways yes, I guess I'd vote labour actually.
Logged


"Never before in all our history have these forces [of organized money] been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me—and I welcome their hatred."

-- Franklin D. Roosevelt
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 59698
United Kingdom


View Profile WWW
« Reply #20 on: January 17, 2010, 12:41:52 pm »
Ignore

If I'm remembering the absurdly complicated rules on the franchise between the Second and Third Reform Acts and universal male suffrage, then I wouldn't have been able to vote until 1918. Labour in all elections since (and including) then because I am a very boring person.
Logged



"It is the essence of a true democracy that people should be respected individually, not simply collectively. It is also of the essence of a democracy that differences and distinctions are recognised and, where relevant, honoured. A democracy should be above all a thoughtful type of society, in these and other respects."

Richard Hoggart
Warner for President '16
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30409
United States



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: February 09, 2010, 11:52:33 pm »
Ignore

1832: Whig
1835: Whig
1837: Conservative
1841: Chartist
1847: Chartist
1852: Chartist
1857: Chartist
1859: Chartist
1865: Conservative
1868: Conservative
1874: Conservative
1880: Conservative
1885: Conservative
1886: Conservative
1892: Independent Labour Party
1895: Independent Labour Party
1900: Labour
1906: Labour
1910 (January): Labour
1910 (December): Labour
1918: Labour
1922: Labour
1923: Labour
1924: Labour
1929: Labour
1931: Labour
1935: Labour
1945: Conservative (personal vote for Churchill)
1950: Conservative (personal vote for Churchill)
1951: Conservative (personal vote for Churchill)
1955: Labour
1959: Labour
1964: Labour
1966: Labour
1970: Labour
1974 (February): Labour
1974 (October): Labour
1979: Liberal
1983: Labour
1987: Labour
1992: Labour
1997: Labour
2001: Labour
2005: Labour
Logged

Obama High's debate team:

"Now let me be clear...I...I...um...uh...now let me be clear.  I strongly condemn the affirmative in the strongest possible terms, and I am closely monitoring their arguments.  Let me be clear on this."
Хahar
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39171
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: 0.43


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: February 11, 2010, 04:15:32 am »
Ignore

1945: Conservative (personal vote for Churchill)
1950: Conservative (personal vote for Churchill)
1951: Conservative (personal vote for Churchill)

Yuck.
Logged

Update reading list

The idea of parodying the preceding Atlasian's postings is laughable, of course, but not for reasons one might expect.
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11966
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: February 11, 2010, 04:34:44 am »
Ignore

1983: Labour

Srsly?
Logged
Warner for President '16
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30409
United States



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: February 11, 2010, 10:58:41 am »
Ignore

1945: Conservative (personal vote for Churchill)
1950: Conservative (personal vote for Churchill)
1951: Conservative (personal vote for Churchill)

Yuck.

Yep Tongue


I don't really see any better alternative.
Logged

Obama High's debate team:

"Now let me be clear...I...I...um...uh...now let me be clear.  I strongly condemn the affirmative in the strongest possible terms, and I am closely monitoring their arguments.  Let me be clear on this."
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines